Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Xray Test Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $10.00 10 Jira users Per Month
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementXray Test Management
Star Rating
(15)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $10.00 10 Jira users Per Month
Learn more about Xray Test ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and requirements. In contrast, Xray Test Management, while still strong at 9.4, is noted for its seamless integration with Jira, making it a preferred choice for teams already using that platform.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a robust Bug Reporting feature, particularly highlighting its Tester Reports & Feedback scoring 9.1, which provides detailed insights into testing outcomes. Xray Test Management, however, offers a more user-friendly interface for Bug Monitoring, with analytics scoring 8.9, making it easier for teams to track and manage bugs effectively.
- G2 users indicate that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are superior, with a score of 8.9, allowing for detailed and customizable reports that cater to enterprise needs. Conversely, Xray Test Management's reporting is rated lower at 7.8, which some users feel lacks depth in customization options.
- Users on G2 highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center's version control feature is robust, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for teams needing to manage multiple versions of test cases. Xray Test Management, with a score of 7.6, has been noted to have limitations in this area, leading to challenges in maintaining test case integrity over time.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its organization capabilities, scoring an impressive 9.7, which helps teams maintain a structured approach to test management. In contrast, Xray Test Management, while scoring well, does not provide the same level of thoroughness, with a score of 9.0, which some users feel could be improved.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's product direction is perceived as less favorable, with a score of 6.8, indicating concerns about future updates and features. In comparison, Xray Test Management has a much higher score of 8.8, suggesting that users feel more confident in the ongoing development and support of the product.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableXray Test Management
Xray Test Management
Starting at $10.00
10 Jira users Per Month
Xray is a Jira native test management solution that supports manual and automated testing. Scales with your teams and integrates seamlessly into your DevOps toolchain.
- Native integration with Jira
- Manual, Cucumber and Automated testing in one place
- AI assisted Test Case Generation
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableXray Test Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.3
13
Ease of Use
7.9
118
7.9
14
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.3
6
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.5
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.1
12
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
9.1
11
8.2
10
8.3
11
9.2
10
8.5
11
Management
8.8
10
7.6
11
8.8
10
7.4
9
8.8
10
8.3
8
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Xray Test Management are categorized as Test Management and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Xray Test Management is categorized as Project Management Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Xray Test Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Computer Software
26.7%
Manufacturing
6.7%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
What is the use of Xray in Jira?
1 Comment
SS
we can use all the test cases data in Jira and after testing all the test cases we can represent data in dashboard form that can show how many test cases...Read more
Xray Test Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
