Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Tuskr

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
Tuskr
Tuskr
Star Rating
(458)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (49.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 user per month
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, achieving a high score of 9.1, which allows for effective management of test cases and results. In contrast, Tuskr also scores 9.1 in this area, but users mention that its user-friendly interface makes it easier to navigate and manage test cases.
  • Reviewers mention that Tuskr outshines OpenText ALM Quality Center in terms of Ease of Use, with a score of 9.3 compared to OpenText's 7.8. Users appreciate Tuskr's intuitive design, which simplifies the onboarding process for new team members.
  • G2 users highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center has robust reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, which is on par with Tuskr. However, users on G2 note that Tuskr's reporting features are more customizable, allowing teams to tailor reports to their specific needs.
  • Reviewers say that while both products offer solid integration capabilities, Tuskr scores higher at 8.7 compared to OpenText's 8.1. Users report that Tuskr's seamless integration with popular tools enhances their workflow efficiency.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a strong focus on test diversity, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for teams working on complex projects. However, reviewers mention that Tuskr's flexibility in test variety, scoring 9.0, allows for easier adaptation to different testing scenarios.
  • Users on G2 highlight that Tuskr's quality of support is notably higher, with a score of 9.1 compared to OpenText's 7.7. Reviewers mention that Tuskr's support team is responsive and helpful, which significantly enhances the user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
Tuskr
Free
$0.00
1 user per month
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
Tuskr
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.9
393
Ease of Use
7.9
118
9.3
401
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
9.4
273
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
9.3
109
Quality of Support
7.7
106
9.1
359
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
9.1
97
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
9.4
386
Features by Category
8.8
11
8.9
328
Functionality
9.2
10
9.1
299
8.2
10
8.8
281
9.2
10
9.0
291
Management
8.8
10
8.9
296
8.8
10
8.6
282
8.8
10
8.8
285
8.8
13
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
6
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
28
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
8.4
28
Not enough data
8.9
28
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Tuskr
Tuskr
OpenText Application Quality Management and Tuskr are categorized as Test Management and Software Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Tuskr
Tuskr has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
Tuskr
Tuskr
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
49.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
37.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
13.8%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Tuskr
Tuskr
Computer Software
25.7%
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Marketing and Advertising
3.4%
Financial Services
2.9%
Retail
2.7%
Other
41.5%
Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
Tuskr
Tuskr Alternatives
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Qase
Qase
Add Qase
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
PractiTest
PractiTest
Add PractiTest
Discussions
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Tuskr
Tuskr Discussions
What is Tuskr used for?
3 Comments
Vijay P.
VP
Test Case management system that allows QA engineers to write test cases, create test plans and execute tests. It is also available to report bugsRead more
Tuskr can be integrated with other tools?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tuskr
Hi Gayathri, Tuskr can seamlessly integrate with over 400 applications through Zapier and Integromat. You can visit https://tuskr.app/integrations for more...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Tuskr has no more discussions with answers