Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Tuleap 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at €13.00 10 Users Per Month
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementTuleap
Star Rating
(18)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at €13.00 10 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a high 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Tuleap, while offering a solid platform, does not provide the same level of depth in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Tuleap shines in Stakeholder Communication and Internal Communication Enablement, making it easier for teams to collaborate effectively. OpenText ALM Quality Center, however, has received lower scores in communication features, indicating potential gaps in team interaction.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Bug Reporting features, particularly in User Reports & Feedback and Tester Reports & Feedback, are robust, scoring 8.2 and 9.1 respectively. Tuleap, while functional, does not match this level of user satisfaction in bug reporting.
- Users on G2 report that Tuleap's Customization options are more flexible, allowing teams to tailor workflows and dashboards to their specific needs, scoring 7.7 compared to OpenText's lower customization capabilities. This flexibility is a significant advantage for smaller teams looking for adaptability.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, providing detailed insights into project progress and quality metrics. In contrast, Tuleap's reporting features, while adequate, do not offer the same level of detail or user satisfaction.
- Users say that Tuleap's Version Control and Analytics features are particularly strong, scoring 8.9, which is crucial for teams needing to track changes and analyze project data effectively. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while competent, does not provide the same level of analytics capabilities as Tuleap.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableTuleap
myTuleap
Starting at €13.00
10 Users Per Month
From 10 to 25 users.
- Tuleap Program Management(portfolio, SAFe®)
- Tuleap Agile (scrum, kanban)
- Tuleap Trackers (workflow, automation)
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableTuleap
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.8
14
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.1
14
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.1
8
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.5
8
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.9
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.5
8
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
10.0
14
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
7.0
5
9.2
12
7.0
5
8.5
12
7.3
5
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
6.7
5
9.2
12
7.3
5
8.6
11
9.3
5
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tasks
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Kanban Project Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Kanban Boards
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content & Documents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Controls
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Project Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Remote Collaboration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Project Collaboration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Planning
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Workflow Management
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Tuleap are categorized as ALM Software and Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Tuleap is categorized as Product Management, Kanban Project Management, Project Collaboration, and Project Management Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tuleap
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Warehousing
11.1%
Automotive
11.1%
Other
27.8%
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Tuleap has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
