Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and TestingWhiz 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (52.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementTestingWhiz
Star Rating
(28)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (52.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestingWhizSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and documentation. In contrast, TestingWhiz, while offering solid features, does not provide the same level of depth in this area.
- Reviewers mention that TestingWhiz shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.8, making it more accessible for teams new to testing software. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.8, is perceived as more complex, which may require additional training for effective utilization.
- G2 users highlight the superior Quality of Support for TestingWhiz, which received an 8.3 rating, compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 7.7. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of TestingWhiz's support team, which can be crucial for teams needing quick resolutions.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has robust Reporting capabilities, scoring 8.9, which allows for detailed insights into testing progress and outcomes. However, TestingWhiz also performs well in this area, but some users feel it lacks the same level of customization in reporting.
- Reviewers mention that TestingWhiz's Automation features are particularly user-friendly, making it easier for teams to implement automated testing processes. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering automation, is noted for being less intuitive, which can slow down adoption.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Bug Monitoring features, particularly its Bug History scoring 9.1, provide excellent tracking and management of defects, which is crucial for maintaining software quality. TestingWhiz, while effective, does not match this level of detail in bug tracking.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableTestingWhiz
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableTestingWhiz
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.3
22
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.8
24
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
7.5
6
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.9
6
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.3
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
9.2
6
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
9.0
24
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and TestingWhiz are categorized as Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, and AWS Marketplace
TestingWhiz has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TestingWhiz
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
16.0%
Real Estate
8.0%
Higher Education
8.0%
Utilities
4.0%
Other
32.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
TestingWhiz has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
