Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and TestComplete

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Management
TestComplete
TestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestComplete
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases. In contrast, TestComplete, while strong, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in dedicated test case management.
  • Reviewers mention that TestComplete shines in Test Diversity, achieving a high score of 9.3, which reflects its ability to handle various testing types, including functional, regression, and performance testing. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while robust, does not provide a specific score for this aspect, suggesting it may not be as versatile in testing approaches.
  • G2 users highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a strong focus on Reporting, with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for tracking test progress and outcomes. TestComplete also scores well in this area, but users report that the reporting features are not as comprehensive, which may limit insights into testing effectiveness.
  • Users on G2 indicate that TestComplete offers superior Automation capabilities, particularly with its ability to create automated tests quickly and efficiently. This is a significant advantage for teams looking to enhance their testing speed and accuracy, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's automation features are perceived as less intuitive.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center provides excellent Traceability features, allowing teams to link requirements to test cases effectively, which is essential for compliance and quality assurance. TestComplete, while it has traceability features, does not match the depth and integration level found in OpenText ALM Quality Center.
  • Users report that the Quality of Support for TestComplete is rated higher at 8.1 compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 7.7, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using TestComplete, which can be a critical factor for teams needing assistance during implementation and ongoing use.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
TestComplete
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
TestComplete
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.5
82
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.0
82
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
7.8
36
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
7.5
35
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.1
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
7.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.3
82
Features by Category
8.8
11
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
6
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Requirements ManagementHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
TestComplete
TestComplete
OpenText Application Quality Management and TestComplete are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
TestComplete
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
12.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
21.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
66.4%
TestComplete
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.3%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
TestComplete
TestComplete
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Alternatives
Perforce ALM
Perforce ALM
Add Perforce ALM
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
TestComplete
TestComplete Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Add Sauce Labs
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
Petr K.
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
TestComplete
TestComplete Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
TestComplete has no discussions with answers