OpenText Application Quality Management vs SonarQube
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SonarQube easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with SonarQube overall.
Reviewers felt that SonarQube meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Application Quality Management.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SonarQube is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SonarQube over OpenText Application Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
SonarQube
Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.