Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Sentry 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UptimeRobot
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSentry
Star Rating
(123)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for efficient management and organization of test cases. In contrast, Sentry's test management features are less robust, leading to a lower user satisfaction in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Sentry shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.6, making it more accessible for small businesses and teams with less technical expertise. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while powerful, has a lower score of 7.8, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight Sentry's superior Quality of Support, with a score of 8.4, which is often praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's support, rated at 7.7, may not meet the same level of user expectations.
- Users on G2 report that Sentry's Product Direction is highly regarded, with a score of 9.3, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 6.8, may not inspire the same confidence in its future development.
- Reviewers say that Sentry's Multi-Channel Alerting feature, rated at 8.3, is particularly effective for real-time notifications across various platforms, enhancing user engagement. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while offering alerting capabilities, does not match the versatility of Sentry in this regard.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Test Diversity feature, scoring 9.3, allows for a wide range of testing scenarios, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications. Sentry, while effective, does not provide the same level of comprehensive testing options, leading to a less favorable comparison in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableSentry
Developer
Free
For solo devs working on small projects
- 5k events/month
- 1 user
- 30 day history
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableSentry
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
9.0
101
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.7
104
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.6
54
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.8
35
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.5
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.9
28
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
9.2
102
Features by Category
User Behavior
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
A/B Testing
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visitor Information
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Agentic AI - Session Replay
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
9
Agentic AI - Website Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
7.5
36
9.2
12
7.4
35
8.5
12
8.0
40
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
8.7
41
9.2
12
8.9
45
8.6
11
8.2
41
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Crash Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.4
11
Crash Data
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Visibility
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.7
14
Agentic AI - Log Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
6.9
16
Not enough data
8.5
19
Response
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.1
19
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
18
Not enough data
7.7
17
Functionality
Not enough data
7.3
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
5.5
13
Not enough data
6.8
14
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Alerting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Metrics
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
8
Not enough data
6.3
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Sentry are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sentry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Computer Software
29.8%
Information Technology and Services
19.0%
Internet
9.1%
Financial Services
4.1%
Logistics and Supply Chain
3.3%
Other
34.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
Sentry has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
