Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Sentry 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (59.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSentry
Star Rating
(183)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Sentry excels in providing detailed error reports, which significantly aid developers in identifying and fixing bugs. Users appreciate its ability to automatically capture errors with rich context, including stack traces and user actions, making it easier to understand the root cause of issues.
- Users say that OpenText Application Quality Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing the entire software development life cycle. Reviewers highlight its effectiveness in requirements gathering, defect logging, and tracking various life cycle processes, which can streamline project management.
- According to verified reviews, Sentry's ease of use is a standout feature, with many users noting that it provides a user-friendly interface that simplifies monitoring and logging tasks. This is particularly beneficial for teams looking to quickly implement a bug tracking solution without extensive training.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText Application Quality Management, while robust, can sometimes feel complex due to its extensive feature set. Users have pointed out that while it covers everything from requirements to test closure, the learning curve may be steeper for new users compared to Sentry.
- Users appreciate Sentry's strong support and community engagement, with many noting that the platform's documentation and resources are helpful for troubleshooting and maximizing the tool's capabilities. This level of support contributes to a more positive user experience overall.
- G2 reviewers highlight that OpenText Application Quality Management is particularly well-suited for enterprise-level projects, as it effectively manages complex workflows. However, some users feel that it may not be as accessible for small businesses, which could benefit from Sentry's more straightforward approach and free entry-level pricing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableSentry
Developer
Free
For solo devs working on small projects
- 5k events/month
- 1 user
- 30 day history
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableSentry
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
9.0
128
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.7
132
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
8.7
81
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.7
41
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.6
99
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.9
34
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
9.3
129
Features by Category
User Behavior
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
A/B Testing
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visitor Information
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Agentic AI - Session Replay
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Website Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Experience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
7.7
38
9.2
12
7.5
36
8.5
12
8.2
43
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
9.1
61
9.2
12
9.0
52
8.6
11
8.3
42
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Crash Monitoring
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
7.4
11
Crash Data
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Metrics
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Visibility
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
18
Monitoring and Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Agentic AI - Log Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Preparation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Log Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
9.1
35
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
8.7
24
Response
Not enough data
8.4
26
Not enough data
8.1
35
Not enough data
8.6
29
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
7.7
17
Functionality
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.0
15
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Telemetry Collection & Ingestion - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Observability Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization & Dashboards - Observability
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Correlation & Root Cause Analysis - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability & Ecosystem Integration - Observability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Features - Observability
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Metrics
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Sentry are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sentry
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Computer Software
29.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.1%
Internet
7.4%
Financial Services
3.4%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
2.7%
Other
38.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
What is your primary use case for Sentry in application monitoring, and how has it impacted your development process?
1 Comment
JD
You can intergrate senty with your application to get the errors on your email or simply getting notified when your system fails or give you any kind of...Read more
Does Sentry support distributed tracing?
1 Comment
Official Response from Sentry
Yes, and the OpenTelemetry question is probably the more useful one to answer first: No, you don't need to re-instrument. Sentry supports OTLP, so you can...Read more
Sentry has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
