OpenText Application Quality Management vs ReadyAPI
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found ReadyAPI easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with ReadyAPI overall.
Reviewers felt that ReadyAPI meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Application Quality Management.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that ReadyAPI is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ReadyAPI over OpenText Application Quality Management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing available
ReadyAPI
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information available
ReadyAPI
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.9
56
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.5
55
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
9.0
16
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.5
14
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.3
53
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.