Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and ReadyAPI 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Visure Requirements
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementReadyAPI
Star Rating
(72)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ReadyAPISummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, ReadyAPI, while strong in other areas, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating a potential gap in test case management capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that ReadyAPI shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.0, making it more user-friendly for new users compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center, which has a lower score of 7.2. This suggests that ReadyAPI may be a better choice for teams looking to quickly implement testing solutions.
- G2 users highlight that ReadyAPI offers superior Test Diversity with a score of 9.3, allowing for a broader range of testing types, including functional, performance, and security testing. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while robust, does not provide a specific score for this aspect, which may limit its appeal for teams needing diverse testing capabilities.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a strong focus on Reporting and Analytics, both scoring 8.9, which is crucial for teams needing detailed insights into testing processes. ReadyAPI, while it has good reporting features, does not match this level of detail, potentially leaving users wanting more in-depth analytics.
- Reviewers mention that ReadyAPI's Quality of Support is rated at 8.3, which is higher than OpenText ALM Quality Center's score of 7.7. This indicates that users may find ReadyAPI's support more responsive and helpful, which can be a significant factor for teams needing assistance during implementation and usage.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a strong emphasis on Traceability, which is essential for compliance and project management, but it lacks specific scores in areas like Test Coverage and Bug Monitoring. In contrast, ReadyAPI's focus on these areas, although not explicitly rated, suggests a more integrated approach to managing testing and bug tracking.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableReadyAPI
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableReadyAPI
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.8
55
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.5
54
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
9.0
15
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.5
14
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.3
52
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.6
15
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.9
53
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and ReadyAPI are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
ReadyAPI is categorized as Service Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ReadyAPI
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
29.0%
Computer Software
23.2%
Financial Services
8.7%
Insurance
5.8%
Telecommunications
2.9%
Other
30.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
ReadyAPI has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
