Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Raygun 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $40.00
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementRaygun
Star Rating
(122)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $40.00
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Raygun's test management features, while solid, do not match this level of depth, leading some users to feel it lacks in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Raygun shines in Real-Time Monitoring, achieving a score of 9.3, which provides immediate insights into application performance. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while effective, does not offer the same level of real-time capabilities, which can be a drawback for teams needing instant feedback.
- G2 users highlight Raygun's superior Ease of Setup with a score of 9.1, making it more accessible for small businesses and teams with limited resources. OpenText ALM Quality Center, on the other hand, has a lower score of 7.2, indicating a steeper learning curve and setup process that may deter some users.
- Users on G2 report that Raygun's Crash Monitoring features, including Constant Monitoring and Timely Alerts, are particularly effective, scoring 8.5 each. OpenText ALM Quality Center's crash monitoring capabilities are less robust, leading to some frustration among users who require more proactive alerting.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center provides strong Reporting capabilities with a score of 8.9, which is crucial for enterprise-level users needing detailed insights. Raygun, while offering analytics, scores slightly lower at 8.6, which some users feel limits their ability to generate comprehensive reports.
- Users say that Raygun's Bug Reporting features are user-friendly and efficient, contributing to its higher overall satisfaction ratings. In comparison, OpenText ALM Quality Center's bug monitoring features, while functional, do not receive the same level of praise, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableRaygun
Crash Reporting
Starting at $40.00
Detect, diagnose and resolve errors affecting your customers.
- Basic subscription starts with 100,000 reserved errors
- Team subscription starts with 200,000 reserved errors
- Business subscription starts with 100,000,000 reserved errors
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRaygun
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.9
89
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.8
89
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
9.1
32
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.7
34
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.5
66
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.6
30
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.6
81
Features by Category
Experience
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
7
Agentic AI - Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Performance
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Feature Not Available
9.2
12
Feature Not Available
8.5
12
Feature Not Available
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
8.6
26
9.2
12
8.4
37
8.6
11
8.5
31
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Crash Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Crash Data
Not enough data
7.8
12
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
12
Metrics
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
9
Response
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
9.0
8
Functionality
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Metrics
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Raygun are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Raygun is categorized as Mobile Crash Reporting, Application Performance Monitoring (APM), and Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Raygun
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Computer Software
28.1%
Information Technology and Services
16.5%
Financial Services
6.6%
Internet
5.8%
Insurance
5.8%
Other
37.2%
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Is there any way to further customize grouping?
1 Comment
AV
Hi there Hugo,
Thanks for reaching out! We do have options for further customizing error groups. You can set up your own custom error group hasher by...Read more
Raygun has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
