Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Qase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$0.00
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementQase
Star Rating
(269)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Qase, while still strong with a score of 9.4, is noted for its user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation and test management.
- Reviewers mention that Qase shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.3, making it particularly appealing for small businesses. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 7.8, is perceived as more complex, which may require additional training for new users.
- G2 users highlight the superior Quality of Support for Qase, rated at 9.6, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. OpenText ALM Quality Center, rated at 7.7, has received mixed feedback regarding support, with some users expressing frustration over response times.
- Users on G2 report that Qase's Test Feedback feature, scoring 8.9, allows for efficient collaboration among team members, enhancing communication and feedback loops. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while scoring 8.3, lacks some of the intuitive collaboration tools that Qase offers.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Reporting capabilities, with a score of 8.9, provide detailed insights and analytics, which are crucial for enterprise-level projects. However, Qase's reporting, rated at 8.6, is noted for being more straightforward and easier to generate, appealing to smaller teams.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's version control feature, scoring 8.9, is robust and essential for managing changes in large projects. In comparison, Qase's version control, rated at 8.3, is functional but lacks some advanced features that larger enterprises might require.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableQase
Free
$0.00
For students, small projects, and non-profits.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
Free Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableQase
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.9
242
Ease of Use
7.9
118
9.3
246
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
9.3
176
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
9.3
110
Quality of Support
7.7
106
9.6
224
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
9.2
96
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
9.5
243
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
9.4
178
8.2
10
8.3
164
9.2
10
9.1
172
Management
8.8
10
8.7
173
8.8
10
8.3
163
8.8
10
8.7
163
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
8.9
82
8.7
5
8.9
83
7.7
5
8.5
82
9.0
5
8.9
82
Automation
9.7
5
8.9
80
8.7
5
Feature Not Available
9.0
5
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.3
11
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Qase are categorized as Test Management, Software Testing, and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, and AWS Marketplace
Qase has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Computer Software
33.7%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Financial Services
6.1%
Program Development
3.8%
Hospital & Health Care
3.0%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Qase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
