Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and Phabricator 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementPhabricator
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhabricatorSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results. In contrast, Phabricator, while strong in other areas, does not have a dedicated test repository feature, which some users find limiting.
- Reviewers mention that Phabricator shines in its ease of use, with a score of 8.4, making it more accessible for teams new to software development tools. OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a lower ease of use score of 7.8, can be more complex to navigate, especially for new users.
- G2 users highlight the superior integration capabilities of OpenText ALM Quality Center, scoring 8.1, which allows seamless connectivity with various enterprise tools. Phabricator, while offering integrations, does not match the breadth and depth of OpenText's offerings, leading to some user frustration.
- Users on G2 report that Phabricator's bug reporting features are particularly robust, with a focus on user feedback and team collaboration, scoring 9.1 in Tester Reports & Feedback. OpenText ALM Quality Center, while effective, does not provide the same level of collaborative feedback mechanisms, which can hinder team communication.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's reporting capabilities are highly rated at 8.9, providing detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes. In comparison, Phabricator's reporting features, while functional, do not offer the same level of depth, which some users find lacking for comprehensive project tracking.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's automation features are particularly strong, allowing for streamlined processes and workflows, which is crucial for large enterprises. Phabricator, while it has automation capabilities, does not match the thoroughness and reliability of OpenText's automation tools, leading to some inefficiencies in larger projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availablePhabricator
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availablePhabricator
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.5
27
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.4
27
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
6.3
15
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
8.2
14
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.1
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.7
27
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and Phabricator are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Phabricator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Internet
18.5%
Retail
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.5%
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Phabricator has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
