Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Software Delivery Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Visure Requirements
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementOpenText Software Delivery Management
Star Rating
(10)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Software Delivery ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows teams to efficiently manage and organize their test cases. In contrast, OpenText ALM Octane, while still effective, does not match this level of performance.
- Reviewers mention that the integration capabilities of OpenText ALM Quality Center, rated at 8.1, provide a seamless experience with various tools, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking for compatibility. OpenText ALM Octane, however, has received mixed feedback on its integration options, which some users find limiting.
- G2 users highlight the Test Diversity feature in OpenText ALM Quality Center, which scored an impressive 9.3, allowing for a wide range of testing types and methodologies. Users on G2 have noted that OpenText ALM Octane, while versatile, does not offer the same breadth of testing options.
- Reviewers say that the Reporting functionality in OpenText ALM Quality Center, with a score of 8.9, provides comprehensive insights that help teams track progress and identify issues effectively. In comparison, OpenText ALM Octane's reporting features are seen as less robust, leading to some frustration among users seeking detailed analytics.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its Bug Monitoring capabilities, particularly with Bug History scoring 9.1, which allows teams to trace and manage bugs efficiently. OpenText ALM Octane, while functional, does not provide the same level of detail in bug tracking, which can hinder troubleshooting efforts.
- Reviewers mention that the organization and thoroughness of OpenText ALM Quality Center, scoring 9.7 and 9.0 respectively, create a structured environment for managing testing processes. In contrast, OpenText ALM Octane has been noted for its less organized approach, which can lead to confusion among team members.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableOpenText Software Delivery Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableOpenText Software Delivery Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
Not enough data
Ease of Use
7.9
118
Not enough data
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.7
106
Not enough data
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
Not enough data
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Software Delivery Management are categorized as ALM Software
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
OpenText Software Delivery Management has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Software Delivery Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Information Technology and Services
75.0%
Computer Software
25.0%
‐
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
What is a feature in ALM octane?
1 Comment
PP
ALM Octane is a web-based application lifecycle management platform that enables teams to collaborate easily, manage the product delivery pipeline, and...Read more
OpenText Software Delivery Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
