Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Application Quality Management and codebeamer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality Managementcodebeamer
Star Rating
(141)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about codebeamerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which reviewers mention allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results, making it a strong choice for large enterprises.
- Reviewers mention that codebeamer shines in its Quality of Support, with a score of 8.3, highlighting that users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, which is crucial for mid-market companies needing quick resolutions.
- G2 users indicate that OpenText ALM Quality Center has a robust Bug Reporting feature, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, scoring 9.1, which reviewers say provides detailed insights into testing outcomes, enhancing the overall quality assurance process.
- Users on G2 report that codebeamer's Automation capabilities are impressive, particularly in the area of Automated Creation & Testing, where it scores 7.6, allowing teams to streamline their testing processes effectively, although some users wish for more advanced features.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's Traceability feature, scoring 8.7, is a standout, enabling teams to easily track requirements through to testing, which is essential for compliance-heavy industries.
- Users say that codebeamer's Test Variety, with a score of 9.0, is a significant advantage, as it supports a wide range of testing methodologies, which reviewers appreciate for its flexibility in adapting to different project needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availablecodebeamer
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availablecodebeamer
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.2
118
8.4
98
Ease of Use
7.9
118
8.0
99
Ease of Setup
7.2
61
7.7
72
Ease of Admin
7.2
59
7.9
67
Quality of Support
7.7
106
8.3
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
56
8.6
62
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
116
8.5
91
Features by Category
Functionality
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
Management
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Automation
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
46
Not enough data
8.8
45
Not enough data
8.7
46
Communication
Not enough data
7.8
43
Not enough data
8.5
41
Procedural
Not enough data
7.7
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management and codebeamer are categorized as Requirements Management and ALM Software
Unique Categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Bug Tracking, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
codebeamer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
codebeamer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Automotive
30.7%
Medical Devices
22.9%
Computer Software
5.7%
Aviation & Aerospace
4.3%
Industrial Automation
3.6%
Other
32.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
highlighting on same customer requirements
1 Comment
JD
Hello Dhilippan
Thanks for your request.
We have some similar feature requests from our customers. We are working on some AI capabilities and this is one...Read more
Reference business case for CSV/Medical device?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Ralf!
While we do not have a case study on this particular topic, we have many clients in the healthcare/pharmaceutical area and all of them have...Read more
codebeamer has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
