Link copied to clipboard # OnCore CTMS vs Rave CTMS Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/oncore-ctms/rave-ctms/export.csv) OnCore CTMSRave CTMS[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **OnCore CTMS** **Contact Us at 1.608.826.6002** · OnCore Licensing **Rave CTMS** No pricing available **Pros & Cons** from reviews **OnCore CTMS** Not enough data **Rave CTMS** Not enough data Integrations **OnCore CTMS** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_1d691480aa3fba0192c2518d27b928f0/epic.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") Epic ](https://www.g2.com/products/epic/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_f11882acb21be8765a2d8a35e643478e/oracle-peoplesoft.png "Product Avatar Image") Oracle PeopleSoft ](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-peoplesoft/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/oncore-ctms/integrations) **Rave CTMS** Not enough data **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **OnCore CTMS** **8.8** /10 Based on 10 responses **Rave CTMS** **8.9** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Use **OnCore CTMS** **8.0** /10 Based on 10 responses **Rave CTMS** **8.1** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Setup **OnCore CTMS** **7.4** /10 Based on 7 responses **Rave CTMS** **6.3** /10 Based on 5 responses Ease of Admin **OnCore CTMS** **8.9** /10 Based on 6 responses **Rave CTMS** **7.3** /10 Based on 5 responses Quality of Support **OnCore CTMS** **8.9** /10 Based on 9 responses **Rave CTMS** **8.0** /10 Based on 15 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **OnCore CTMS** **9.2** /10 Based on 6 responses **Rave CTMS** **8.3** /10 Based on 5 responses Product Direction (% positive) **OnCore CTMS** **8.7** /10 Based on 9 responses **Rave CTMS** **6.1** /10 Based on 15 responses **Features** ratings from reviews Clinical Trial Management Systems **8.9** /10 Based on 6 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 14.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 28.6% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 14.3% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 28.6% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 21.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 21.1% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 26.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 52.6% **Reviewers' Industry** [![OnCore CTMS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fdb1a0bcc056d0012e5af44146eadafb/oncore-ctms.svg "OnCore CTMS")](https://www.g2.com/products/oncore-ctms/reviews) OnCore CTMS Research 42.9% Higher Education 21.4% Hospital & Health Care 14.3% Medical Practice 7.1% Financial Services 7.1% Other 7.1% [![Rave CTMS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8a9290e0bd0e6490bace3aa2fc81c97e/medidata-ctms.jpg "Rave CTMS")](https://www.g2.com/products/rave-ctms/reviews) Rave CTMS Hospital & Health Care 31.6% Research 21.1% Pharmaceuticals 21.1% Information Technology and Services 10.5% Medical Devices 5.3% Other 10.5% Alternatives **OnCore CTMS Alternatives** ![Viedoc](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/10deb15544ce14a0f7747ee8ff8e0cdb/viedoc.svg "Viedoc") [ Viedoc ](/products/viedoc/reviews) ![Clinical Research Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e340cf2d8162c8c01e4f2d519c48c10b/clinical-research-suite.svg "Clinical Research Suite") [ Clinical Research Suite ](/products/clinical-research-suite/reviews) ![RealTime eClinical Solutions](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/06d064606c60a467b3089213a96e6e52/realtime-eclinical-solutions.svg "RealTime eClinical Solutions") [ RealTime eClinical Solutions ](/products/realtime-eclinical-solutions/reviews) ![Florence eBinders](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/aa72998ccb4d564c3bfc857170b8eacc/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders.svg "Florence eBinders") [ Florence eBinders ](/products/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders/reviews) **Rave CTMS Alternatives** ![Viedoc](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/10deb15544ce14a0f7747ee8ff8e0cdb/viedoc.svg "Viedoc") [ Viedoc ](/products/viedoc/reviews) ![Florence eBinders](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/aa72998ccb4d564c3bfc857170b8eacc/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders.svg "Florence eBinders") [ Florence eBinders ](/products/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders/reviews) ![Clinical Research Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e340cf2d8162c8c01e4f2d519c48c10b/clinical-research-suite.svg "Clinical Research Suite") [ Clinical Research Suite ](/products/clinical-research-suite/reviews) ![Clinical Conductor CTMS](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/fdb1a0bcc056d0012e5af44146eadafb/clinical-conductor-ctms.svg "Clinical Conductor CTMS") [ Clinical Conductor CTMS ](/products/clinical-conductor-ctms/reviews) ## OnCore CTMS vs Rave CTMS FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between Rave CTMS vs OnCore CTMS? OnCore CTMS stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction in support and administration, while Rave CTMS is noted for advanced features and user-friendliness. | [Rave CTMS](https://www.g2.com/products/rave-ctms/reviews) | [OnCore CTMS](https://www.g2.com/products/oncore-ctms/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.2/5 (23 reviews) | 4.4/5 (14 reviews) | | — | — | | 6.3 | 7.4 | | 8.0 | 8.9 | | Advanced features and user-friendly interface | Intuitive navigation, strong API/database integration, and institutional workflow support | ### How do the pricing models of Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS compare? OnCore CTMS is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing and cost structure. - **Rave CTMS:** In recent reviews, some users note satisfaction with advanced features but mention that known issues may require additional costs for fixes. - **OnCore CTMS:** Reviewers highlight strong value, especially for institutions needing robust reporting and integration capabilities, with no significant pricing concerns raised. ### What are the best alternatives to Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS? The top three alternatives to Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS are Viedoc, Florence eBinders, and —. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Rave CTMS](https://www.g2.com/products/rave-ctms/reviews) | 4.2/5 (23 reviews) | — | — | Advanced features and user-friendly interface | | [OnCore CTMS](https://www.g2.com/products/oncore-ctms/reviews) | 4.4/5 (14 reviews) | — | — | Intuitive navigation, strong API/database integration, and institutional workflow support | | [Viedoc](https://www.g2.com/products/viedoc/reviews) | 4.5/5 (274 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — | | [Florence eBinders](https://www.g2.com/products/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders/reviews) | 4.5/5 (109 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — | ### Which Clinical Trial Management Systems features should I prioritize when comparing Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS? Buyers comparing Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS should prioritize ease of setup, quality of support, integration capabilities, reporting features, and workflow customization. - **Ease of Setup:** Rave CTMS scores 6.3, OnCore CTMS scores 7.4. - **Quality of Support:** Rave CTMS scores 8.0, OnCore CTMS scores 8.9. - **Integration Capabilities:** OnCore CTMS is frequently praised for its API and database integration, enabling EMR and institutional system connectivity. - **Reporting Features:** OnCore CTMS is highlighted for robust reporting and metrics dashboards in recent reviews. - **Workflow Customization:** OnCore CTMS reviewers note some rigidity but appreciate standardized processes, while Rave CTMS is valued for advanced features and user-friendliness. ### What are the pros and cons of Rave CTMS vs OnCore CTMS? OnCore CTMS is strongest in support and institutional integration, while Rave CTMS is praised for advanced features and user-friendliness. - **Rave CTMS strengths:** Advanced features, user-friendly interface, rapid customer support response, and strong EDC-CTMS integration. - **Rave CTMS trade-offs:** Reviewers mention bugs, lagging issues, and a less modern interface; some note known issues may require additional costs for fixes. - **OnCore CTMS strengths:** Intuitive navigation, robust API/database integration, strong reporting and metrics, and high-quality support. - **OnCore CTMS trade-offs:** Some rigidity in customization, with limited flexibility for unique workflows; certain features may require additional contracts. ### Is Rave CTMS or OnCore CTMS better for small businesses? Rave CTMS is a better fit for small businesses based on reviewer sentiment and advanced feature usability. - **Rave CTMS:** Reviewers highlight user-friendliness and ease of setup, making it accessible for smaller organizations with limited resources. - **OnCore CTMS:** Reviewers emphasize institutional workflow support and integration, which may be more suited to larger organizations or research centers. ### Which Clinical Trial Management Systems platform has better integrations? OnCore CTMS is favored for integrations, with reviewers highlighting its API and database connectivity for institutional systems. - **Rave CTMS:** Reviewers mention integration with EDC systems and real-time data sync, especially for protocol deviation management. - **OnCore CTMS:** Recent reviews praise its well-documented API and database, enabling integration with EMR and other institutional systems. ### How do Rave CTMS and OnCore CTMS compare on customer support? OnCore CTMS leads in Quality of Support with a 0.9-point advantage over Rave CTMS (8.9 vs 8.0). - **Rave CTMS:** Reviewers note responsive customer support and quick resolution of issues, though some mention variability in support experiences. - **OnCore CTMS:** Reviewers consistently praise the support team’s responsiveness, open communication, and helpfulness, with high satisfaction across recent and older reviews. ### Which is easier to implement, Rave CTMS or OnCore CTMS? OnCore CTMS is easier to implement, with a 1.1-point higher Ease of Setup score (7.4 vs 6.3) and stronger Ease of Admin. - **Rave CTMS:** Reviewers describe the setup as generally straightforward but note occasional complexity and the need for training, especially for advanced features. - **OnCore CTMS:** Reviewers highlight intuitive navigation, clear setup processes, and effective onboarding, with multiple mentions of ease for new users and administrators. ## OnCore CTMS vs Rave CTMS When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Rave CTMS easier to use. However, OnCore CTMS is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with OnCore CTMS overall. - Reviewers felt that Rave CTMS meets the needs of their business better than OnCore CTMS. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OnCore CTMS is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OnCore CTMS over Rave CTMS.