Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Octopus Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$5,000 per year
Octopus Deploy
Star Rating
(57)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansRed Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Star Rating
(373)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$5,000 per year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform excels in Configuration Management with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to manage complex environments efficiently. In contrast, Octopus Deploy, while still strong, scores 8.5, indicating it may not handle intricate configurations as seamlessly.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's Deployment Automation feature is highly rated at 9.3, with users appreciating its straightforward automation processes. Octopus Deploy, however, shines slightly brighter with a score of 9.6, indicating a more robust deployment pipeline that users find easier to navigate.
- G2 users highlight the Ease of Setup for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, scoring 8.3, which is generally favorable. However, Octopus Deploy falls behind with a score of 7.4, suggesting that users may face more challenges during initial setup.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms have strong Access Control features, but Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform scores 8.5 while Octopus Deploy slightly edges out with a score of 8.7, indicating a more user-friendly approach to managing permissions and roles.
- Users on G2 report that Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's Quality of Support is rated at 8.3, which is commendable, but Octopus Deploy is close behind at 8.2, suggesting that both platforms provide solid support, though Ansible may have a slight edge in responsiveness.
- Users say that the Product Direction for Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is rated highly at 9.4, indicating a strong commitment to future enhancements. In comparison, Octopus Deploy's score of 8.5 suggests that while it is also focused on improvement, users may perceive a slower pace in innovation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Basic Tower
$5,000
per year
Up to 100 nodes
- 30 Days of Support only
- No response time SLA
- Maintenance & Upgrades
Free Trial
Octopus Deploy
Free Trial is available
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
51
9.0
154
Ease of Use
8.6
51
8.7
318
Ease of Setup
7.6
32
8.2
246
Ease of Admin
8.2
28
8.8
90
Quality of Support
8.3
42
8.3
126
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
25
8.8
74
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
51
9.4
155
Features by Category
Administration
8.6
14
9.0
23
8.8
16
8.5
23
8.8
16
8.4
21
Functionality
9.6
16
9.3
24
8.6
12
8.6
20
8.6
14
8.3
21
9.0
15
8.6
24
6.9
6
8.2
19
Processes
8.9
15
8.6
22
8.8
16
8.7
22
8.4
15
8.3
20
Configuration
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Agentic AI - Network Automation Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Logistics
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Security - Network Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.9
29
Automation
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.0
31
IT Management
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.5
28
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
6
9.1
16
9.0
7
8.9
17
9.2
6
8.9
16
Management
9.2
6
9.1
15
8.1
6
8.2
16
8.3
6
9.6
16
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Preparation
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Visualization
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Log Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Processes
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
11
Functionality
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.3
5
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Management
10.0
5
|
Verified
8.3
5
9.7
5
|
Verified
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation Support - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Error Management - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Compliance and Reporting - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Runbook Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
5.6
13
Platform
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
12
Not enough data
6.9
12
Security
Not enough data
6.0
12
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
6.8
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.3
12
Agentic AI - Enterprise IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Octopus Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform are categorized as Runbook Automation, Continuous Delivery, Build Automation, Application Release Orchestration, Configuration Management, and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
Octopus Deploy has no unique categories
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Network Automation Tools, Patch Management, Vulnerability Scanner, Log Analysis, and Enterprise IT Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Octopus Deploy
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.2%
Information Technology and Services
24.5%
Internet
5.7%
Insurance
5.7%
Retail
3.8%
Other
30.2%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Financial Services
10.7%
Computer Software
9.0%
Telecommunications
8.2%
Banking
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Discussions
Is Octopus Deploy a CI tool?
1 Comment
MR
No, Octopus is meant for deploymentsRead more
Octopus Deploy has no more discussions with answers
What is Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform used for?
1 Comment
AJ
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform streamlines IT operations by automating configuration management, application deployment, and task automation. It excels...Read more
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
