Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Octoparse and PhantomBuster 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HasData
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (78.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (73.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
No pricing available
Octoparse
Star Rating
(52)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (78.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plansPhantomBuster
Star Rating
(121)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (73.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhantomBusterSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Octoparse excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, while PhantomBuster trails behind at 8.0. Reviewers mention that Octoparse's intuitive interface and user-friendly design make it accessible for beginners, whereas PhantomBuster's steeper learning curve can be challenging for new users.
- Reviewers say that Octoparse shines in data structuring with a score of 9.7, compared to PhantomBuster's 8.1. Users highlight Octoparse's ability to easily organize and format extracted data, making it more efficient for analysis, while PhantomBuster's data structuring features are seen as less robust.
- Users on G2 mention that Octoparse's quality of support is outstanding, scoring 9.5, while PhantomBuster's support is rated at 8.2. Reviewers appreciate Octoparse's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, whereas PhantomBuster users report slower response times and less comprehensive resources.
- Reviewers mention that Octoparse offers superior cloud extraction capabilities with a score of 9.4, compared to PhantomBuster's 8.0. Users say that Octoparse's cloud-based features allow for seamless data extraction without the need for local installations, which is a significant advantage for remote teams.
- G2 users report that Octoparse has a higher overall satisfaction rating with a star score of 4.8, while PhantomBuster has a score of 4.4. Reviewers express that Octoparse consistently meets their expectations and needs, while PhantomBuster users have noted some limitations in functionality.
- Users say that Octoparse's diverse extraction points score of 9.6 outshines PhantomBuster's 8.2. Reviewers highlight Octoparse's ability to extract data from a wider range of sources, including complex websites, which is a crucial feature for users needing comprehensive data scraping solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Octoparse
Free
Free
Per Month
For small, simple projects
- Octoparse Desktop App
- 10 tasks
- Run tasks on local devices only
PhantomBuster
No pricing availableFree Trial
Octoparse
Free Trial is available
PhantomBuster
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
47
8.5
104
Ease of Use
9.3
48
8.2
108
Ease of Setup
9.6
39
8.2
88
Ease of Admin
9.6
13
7.9
33
Quality of Support
9.6
46
8.2
84
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
13
8.0
32
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
43
8.5
104
Features by Category
Data Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Accuracy
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Sales Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Lead Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.6
38
8.0
90
9.7
38
8.1
92
9.7
38
8.2
90
9.5
38
7.5
87
9.5
38
7.9
87
9.5
38
7.4
86
Diverse Extraction Points
9.6
38
8.0
90
Lead Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Lead Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Lead Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Lead Capture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Capture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Lead Scoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Attribution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Discovery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Octoparse and PhantomBuster are categorized as Data Extraction
Unique Categories
Octoparse has no unique categories
PhantomBuster is categorized as Lead Capture, Lead Intelligence, Lead Scoring, and Sales Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Octoparse
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PhantomBuster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
17.6%
Information Technology and Services
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
7.8%
Research
5.9%
Internet
5.9%
Other
52.9%
Computer Software
22.2%
Marketing and Advertising
18.8%
Information Technology and Services
17.1%
Consulting
3.4%
Internet
3.4%
Other
35.0%
Discussions
How should I build the pagination inside a loop item?
1 Comment
ML
Pagination is a technique widely used in web design that divides content into several pages, presenting large data sets in a much easier way for internet...Read more
Octoparse has no more discussions with answers
What is PhantomBuster used for?
2 Comments
KG
For "scraping" or compiling data from multiple sources, such as LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Google maps, etc.Read more
Is the PhantomBuster good?
1 Comment
KG
This is the wrong word to use to describe PB. This platform is actually vital if you want to pull info from SalesNav. They offer 10 minutes of FREE usage a...Read more
PhantomBuster has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
