Link copied to clipboard # Nutrient Workflow vs ProcessMaker Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/nutrient-workflow/processmaker/export.csv) Nutrient WorkflowProcessMaker[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Nutrient Workflow** Free Trial No pricing available **ProcessMaker** Free Trial **Contact Us** Per Year · Professional **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Nutrient Workflow** 3 monthsFaster Based on 11 responses **ProcessMaker** 4 months Based on 28 responses Return on Investment **Nutrient Workflow** 18 months4 months sooner Based on 8 responses **ProcessMaker** 22 months Based on 20 responses Perceived Cost **Nutrient Workflow** $$$$$ **ProcessMaker** $$$$$ Average Discount **Nutrient Workflow** Not enough reviews yet **ProcessMaker** 11% **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Nutrient Workflow** [ Ease of Use (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1385011&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Customer Support (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1384929&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Coding Difficulty (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2479135&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Complex Features (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1384496&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **ProcessMaker** [ Ease of Use (7) ](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1567667&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Automation (3) ](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1568229&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Functionality Limitations (3) ](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1567271&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (3) ](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1565695&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **Nutrient Workflow** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_dbc216204b9197e5c0a1b6ac81e9b7e1/azure-devops-server.png "Product Avatar Image") Azure DevOps Server ](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/integrations) **ProcessMaker** Not enough data Screenshots **Nutrient Workflow** ![Nutrient Workflow screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/109027/comments.png) **ProcessMaker** ![ProcessMaker screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1342199/Screenshot-2026-02-26-at-9.46.55-AM.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Nutrient Workflow** 8.8 8.834 **ProcessMaker** 8.6 8.6246 Ease of Use **Nutrient Workflow** 9.2 9.234 **ProcessMaker** 8.6 8.6251 Ease of Setup **Nutrient Workflow** 8.6 8.621 **ProcessMaker** 7.8 7.8180 Ease of Admin **Nutrient Workflow** 8.7 8.723 **ProcessMaker** 8.1 8.1174 Quality of Support **Nutrient Workflow** 9.5 9.532 **ProcessMaker** 8.2 8.2226 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Nutrient Workflow** 9.3 9.323 **ProcessMaker** 8.3 8.3166 Product Direction (% positive) **Nutrient Workflow** 8.0 8.035 **ProcessMaker** 8.2 8.2244 **Features** ratings from reviews Business Process Management 8.6 21 8.1 206 Workflow Management 8.3 20 8.2 76 Mobile Forms Automation Not enough data 8.0 19 Digital Process Automation (DPA) Not enough data 8.4 33 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 52.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.8% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 19.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 52.8% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 27.8% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 24.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 40.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 34.5% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 24.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 40.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 34.5% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Nutrient Workflow](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d7bea5dc8294b5827909703d5ce88de6/nutrient-workflow.svg "Nutrient Workflow")](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews) Nutrient Workflow Construction 8.3% Information Technology and Services 8.3% Automotive 5.6% Consulting 5.6% Gambling & Casinos 5.6% Other 66.7% [![ProcessMaker](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e19512efec4f75f57e7ee052012eff0d/processmaker.png "ProcessMaker")](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews) ProcessMaker Information Technology and Services 9.5% Financial Services 8.4% Banking 7.6% Telecommunications 5.8% Higher Education 4.7% Other 64.0% FAQs ## Nutrient Workflow vs ProcessMaker FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between ProcessMaker vs Nutrient Workflow? Nutrient Workflow stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction on ease of use, setup, and support, while ProcessMaker is noted for its automation capabilities and document generation features. | | [ProcessMaker](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews) | [Nutrient Workflow](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews) | | --- | --- | --- | | G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.3/5 (305 reviews) | 4.5/5 (40 reviews) | | Largest Segment | Mid-Market | Mid-Market | | Ease of Setup score | 7.8 | 8.6 | | Quality of Support score | 8.2 | 9.5 | | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | Automation (3 all-time mentions) | Ease of Use (2 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow compare? Nutrient Workflow is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing and overall value proposition. - **ProcessMaker:** Reviewers frequently mention that the cost is considerable, especially for small and medium-sized organizations, but many feel the investment is justified by the platform's capabilities. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Recent reviews highlight satisfaction with the value provided, with minimal mention of pricing as a drawback and positive sentiment toward its flexibility and support. ### What are the best alternatives to ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow? The top three alternatives to ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow are Kissflow, Nintex, and Pega Platform. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [ProcessMaker](https://www.g2.com/products/processmaker/reviews) | 4.3/5 (305 reviews) | Mid-Market | Cost is considerable but justified by automation capabilities | Automation (3 all-time mentions) | | [Nutrient Workflow](https://www.g2.com/products/nutrient-workflow/reviews) | 4.5/5 (40 reviews) | Mid-Market | Positive value sentiment, minimal pricing concerns | Ease of Use (2 all-time mentions) | | [Kissflow](https://www.g2.com/products/kissflow/reviews) | 4.3/5 (591 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — | | [Nintex](https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews) | 4.3/5 (1322 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — | | [Pega Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/pega-platform/reviews) | 4.2/5 (278 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — | ### Which Business Process Management features should I prioritize when comparing ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow? Buyers should prioritize ease of use, automation capabilities, integration, quality of support, and document generation when comparing ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow. - **Ease of Use:** ProcessMaker 8.6, Nutrient Workflow 9.2 - **Automation:** ProcessMaker (3 all-time mentions), Nutrient Workflow (recent reviews highlight automation and process standardization) - **Integration:** ProcessMaker (2 all-time mentions), Nutrient Workflow (recent reviews cite integration with ERP and business systems) - **Quality of Support:** ProcessMaker 8.2, Nutrient Workflow 9.5 - **Document Generation:** ProcessMaker offers document generation, Nutrient Workflow does not list this feature ### What are the pros and cons of ProcessMaker vs Nutrient Workflow? ProcessMaker's headline strength is automation, while Nutrient Workflow excels in ease of use and support. - **ProcessMaker strengths:** Automation (3 all-time mentions), efficiency (3), customer support (2), ease of learning (2), easy integrations (2), process simplification (2), training (2), AI technology (1), API integration (1) - **ProcessMaker trade-offs:** Functionality limitations (3), missing features (3), bugs (2), limited features (2), performance issues (2), access issues (1), app issues (1) - **Nutrient Workflow strengths:** Ease of use (2), customer support (1), customizability (1), customization (1), ease of learning (1), flexibility (1), intuitive (1) - **Nutrient Workflow trade-offs:** Coding difficulty (1), complex features (1), complexity (1), debugging issues (1), integration issues (1), learning curve (1), missing features (1), not user-friendly (1), performance issues (1), poor customer support (1), technical expertise required (1), time-consuming (1) ### Is ProcessMaker or Nutrient Workflow better for small businesses? Nutrient Workflow is the better fit for small businesses, with higher ease of use and support scores and positive small-business reviewer sentiment. - **ProcessMaker:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers note the cost can be considerable for small and medium-sized organizations, though automation benefits are recognized. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; recent reviews from smaller organizations highlight ease of use, customization, and strong support as key benefits. ### Which Business Process Management platform has better integrations? ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow are rated comparably for integrations, with both products receiving positive reviewer feedback on integration capabilities. - **ProcessMaker:** Integrations and easy integrations are cited in 2 all-time mentions; reviewers highlight API integration and custom integrations with ERP and business systems. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Recent reviews mention integration with ERP solutions and business systems, with positive sentiment toward integration flexibility and ease. ### How do ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow compare on customer support? Nutrient Workflow leads ProcessMaker in Quality of Support by 1.3 points, a material difference favoring Nutrient Workflow. - **ProcessMaker:** Reviewers describe support as generally helpful, though some note slow response times and a need for more up-to-date documentation. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Reviewers consistently praise the support team for responsiveness, proactive check-ins, and effective problem resolution. ### Which is easier to implement, ProcessMaker or Nutrient Workflow? Nutrient Workflow is easier to implement, with a higher Ease of Setup score by 0.8 points over ProcessMaker. - **ProcessMaker:** Reviewers note that setup is straightforward for basic workflows but can require technical knowledge for complex processes; some mention a learning curve and time investment for advanced features. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Reviewers highlight intuitive setup, drag-and-drop workflow building, and ease of onboarding for both technical and non-technical users. ### Which product has better Integration? ProcessMaker and Nutrient Workflow are rated comparably for Integration, with both products receiving positive reviewer feedback on integration capabilities. - **ProcessMaker:** Integration is cited in 2 all-time mentions; reviewers highlight API integration and custom integrations with ERP and business systems. - **Nutrient Workflow:** Recent reviews mention integration with ERP solutions and business systems, with positive sentiment toward integration flexibility and ease. Alternatives **Nutrient Workflow Alternatives** ![Kissflow](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/556f5fda4738c6cc6194f324db366caa/kissflow.svg "Kissflow") [ Kissflow ](/products/kissflow/reviews) ![Nintex](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6d05d223727de012d13b1eb6341b2deb/nintex-nintex.svg "Nintex") [ Nintex ](/products/nintex-nintex/reviews) ![Appian](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/bd72b36193132a308f5957cf548d1fd7/appian.svg "Appian") [ Appian ](/products/appian/reviews) ![Laserfiche](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1549935323/laserfiche.svg "Laserfiche") [ Laserfiche ](/products/laserfiche/reviews) **ProcessMaker Alternatives** ![Nintex](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6d05d223727de012d13b1eb6341b2deb/nintex-nintex.svg "Nintex") [ Nintex ](/products/nintex-nintex/reviews) ![Kissflow](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/556f5fda4738c6cc6194f324db366caa/kissflow.svg "Kissflow") [ Kissflow ](/products/kissflow/reviews) ![Pega Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e069cb407f8ebbf6ba84052b46de7843/pega-platform.svg "Pega Platform") [ Pega Platform ](/products/pega-platform/reviews) ![Process Street](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1553722504/process-street.png "Process Street") [ Process Street ](/products/process-street/reviews) ## Nutrient Workflow vs ProcessMaker When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Nutrient Workflow easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Nutrient Workflow overall. - Reviewers felt that Nutrient Workflow meets the needs of their business better than ProcessMaker. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Nutrient Workflow is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ProcessMaker over Nutrient Workflow.