Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare NetApp AFF and Pure Storage FlashArray 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
NetApp AFF
Star Rating
(11)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about NetApp AFFPure Storage FlashArray
Star Rating
(10)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Pure Storage FlashArraySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Pure Storage Flash Arrays excels in ease of use, scoring higher than NetApp AFF, with reviewers mentioning its intuitive interface and streamlined management tools that simplify daily operations.
- Reviewers mention that Pure Storage Flash Arrays has a superior quality of support, with a score of 9.0 compared to NetApp AFF's 8.3. Users appreciate the responsiveness and expertise of Pure Storage's support team, often highlighting quick resolution times.
- G2 users indicate that Pure Storage Flash Arrays has a strong product direction, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while NetApp AFF scores 8.9. Reviewers express confidence in Pure Storage's commitment to innovation and future-proofing their technology.
- Users on G2 report that Pure Storage Flash Arrays meets requirements exceptionally well, with a score of 9.4, compared to NetApp AFF's 9.1. Reviewers highlight features like data reduction and deduplication as key strengths that enhance performance and efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that while both products serve different market segments, Pure Storage Flash Arrays is favored in the enterprise space (62.5% of reviews), indicating its robust capabilities for larger organizations, whereas NetApp AFF is more popular among small businesses (54.5% of reviews).
- Users say that the entry-level pricing for NetApp AFF is more accessible, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for cost-effective solutions, while Pure Storage Flash Arrays is often seen as a premium option with a higher initial investment.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
NetApp AFF
No pricing availablePure Storage FlashArray
No pricing availableFree Trial
NetApp AFF
No trial information availablePure Storage FlashArray
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
11
9.4
9
Ease of Use
8.7
9
Not enough data
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
10
9.0
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.7
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
11
10.0
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
NetApp AFF and Pure Storage FlashArray are categorized as All-Flash Arrays (AFA)
Unique Categories
NetApp AFF has no unique categories
Pure Storage FlashArray has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
NetApp AFF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Pure Storage FlashArray
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
18.2%
Manufacturing
9.1%
Consulting
9.1%
Retail
9.1%
Research
9.1%
Other
45.5%
Printing
12.5%
Marketing and Advertising
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Hospital & Health Care
12.5%
Higher Education
12.5%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
NetApp AFF has no discussions with answers
Pure Storage FlashArray has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
