Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Neo4j Graph Database and Tigergraph 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Neo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseTigergraph
Star Rating
(11)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TigergraphSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in ease of setup with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick deployment, while Tigergraph, with a score of 7.2, is noted for its more complex setup process.
- Reviewers mention that Tigergraph shines in query language capabilities, scoring 8.9 compared to Neo4j's 8.2, indicating that users find Tigergraph's query optimization and performance analysis features more robust for handling complex queries.
- G2 users highlight that Neo4j has a strong community and support system, reflected in its quality of support score of 8.5, while Tigergraph, with a score of 8.7, is praised for its dedicated support team, particularly for enterprise-level users.
- Users on G2 report that Tigergraph offers superior data modeling capabilities, scoring 9.3, which is beneficial for enterprises needing advanced data analytics, whereas Neo4j's score of 7.7 suggests it may not meet the same level of complexity required by larger organizations.
- Reviewers mention that Tigergraph's security features, particularly data encryption with a score of 9.1, are highly regarded, making it a strong choice for organizations prioritizing data protection, while Neo4j's encryption score of 7.2 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Users say that Neo4j's built-in search functionality, scoring 8.0, is user-friendly and effective for small-scale applications, while Tigergraph's score of 8.3 suggests it provides a more comprehensive search capability suitable for larger datasets.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Neo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Tigergraph
No pricing availableFree Trial
Neo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Tigergraph
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
73
8.5
9
Ease of Use
8.2
75
7.4
9
Ease of Setup
8.7
31
7.2
6
Ease of Admin
8.0
28
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
64
8.7
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
24
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
68
8.7
9
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
7.7
22
9.3
9
8.3
20
8.5
9
8.0
20
8.3
9
7.5
14
8.1
9
8.2
21
8.9
9
Availability
7.1
12
8.0
9
6.9
13
7.9
8
Performance
7.4
19
8.3
9
Security
7.9
15
8.5
9
8.0
16
8.8
8
7.6
15
8.3
9
7.1
14
9.1
9
Support
7.2
15
8.3
9
6.2
15
7.9
8
7.7
17
8.9
9
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Neo4j Graph Database and Tigergraph are categorized as Graph Databases
Unique Categories
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS) and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Tigergraph has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tigergraph
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Computer Software
18.2%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Hospital & Health Care
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What companies use neo4j?
1 Comment
Official Response from Neo4j Graph Database
Great question. This page https://neo4j.com/customers/ has a shortlist of referenceable customers. Comcast, eBay, Adobe, and Microsoft, to name a few. Read more
Tigergraph has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
