Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Neo4j Graph Database and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Neo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseScyllaDB
Star Rating
(356)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Neo4j Graph Database excels in data modeling with a score of 8.1, allowing for complex relationships and graph structures, while ScyllaDB, with a score of 7.7, is noted for its more traditional data model that may not support intricate relationships as effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's query language is highly intuitive, scoring 8.6, which facilitates easier data retrieval for graph-based queries. In contrast, ScyllaDB's query language, scoring 8.0, is more aligned with traditional SQL, which some users find less flexible for graph-oriented tasks.
- G2 users highlight Neo4j's built-in search capabilities, scoring 8.0, as a significant advantage for users needing to perform complex searches within graph data. ScyllaDB, while strong in performance, does not emphasize built-in search features to the same extent.
- Users on G2 report that ScyllaDB shines in scalability with a score of 9.2, making it ideal for applications requiring high throughput and low latency. In comparison, Neo4j's scalability is rated at 8.9, which may be sufficient for smaller applications but could face challenges under heavy loads.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j's ease of setup is rated at 8.8, making it user-friendly for new users, while ScyllaDB's ease of setup is slightly lower at 8.2, indicating a steeper learning curve for some users.
- Users say that ScyllaDB's performance analysis features, scoring 8.8, provide robust monitoring tools that help in maintaining optimal performance, whereas Neo4j's performance analysis is rated lower, suggesting it may not offer the same level of insight into system performance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Neo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
ScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Neo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
ScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
73
8.8
300
Ease of Use
8.2
75
8.6
309
Ease of Setup
8.7
31
8.3
218
Ease of Admin
8.0
28
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.5
64
8.5
280
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
24
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
68
9.2
292
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Maintenance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
148
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
141
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
139
Security
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
8.5
134
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
8.5
130
Support
Not enough data
8.5
128
Not enough data
8.4
135
Data Management
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Availability
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Not enough data
Performance
7.4
19
Not enough data
Security
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Not enough data
Support
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
8.4
66
Scalability
Not enough data
9.0
71
Not enough data
8.6
68
Security
Not enough data
8.1
63
Support
Not enough data
8.5
70
Not enough data
8.4
69
Not enough data
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Neo4j Graph Database and ScyllaDB are categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Unique Categories
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database Management Systems (DBMS)
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Wide Column Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Marketing and Advertising
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Computer Software
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
5.8%
Education Management
3.5%
Banking
3.5%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What are some of the benefits provided by the neo4j DBMS?
1 Comment
SS
Very easy to grow database schema over timeRead more
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
