When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SecurityScorecard easier to use and set up. However, Mitratech Prevalent is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Mitratech Prevalent overall.
Reviewers felt that SecurityScorecard meets the needs of their business better than Mitratech Prevalent.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Mitratech Prevalent is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Mitratech Prevalent over SecurityScorecard.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mitratech Prevalent
No pricing available
SecurityScorecard
No pricing available
Free Trial
Mitratech Prevalent
No trial information available
SecurityScorecard
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
11
8.7
76
Ease of Use
8.5
11
9.2
76
Ease of Setup
8.7
9
9.2
58
Ease of Admin
9.8
7
8.7
50
Quality of Support
9.7
11
8.8
74
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Apart from Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, How can we use other functionality of SS?
1 Comment
Official Response from SecurityScorecard
Hello Mohammed,
In addition to Third Party & Supplier Risk Management, SecurityScorecard can be used for several different use cases such as reputational...Read more
We use it for 3rd party risk assessments. It offers organizations valuable insights into the vulnerabilities that exist in their own environments and their...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.