Link copied to clipboard

# Miro vs iObeya Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/miro/iobeya/export.csv)

MiroiObeya[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**Miro**
Free Trial

**$10.00** per\_user Per Month · Starter

**$20.00** per\_user Per Month · Business

**Contact Vendor for Pricing** · Enterprise

**$15.00** per\_user Per Month · Consultant plan

Show more

**iObeya**
Free Trial

**$4,200.00** other Per Year · Team+

**Contact us** other Per Year · Enterprise

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**Miro**
$$$$$

**iObeya**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Miro**
11%

**iObeya**
18%7% more

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**Miro** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**iObeya** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**Miro** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**iObeya** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**Miro**
[
Ease of Use (4144)
](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1311255&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Team Collaboration (3192)
](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1312504&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Missing Features (1419)
](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1310908&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Board Management (1015)
](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1313058&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**iObeya**
[
Ease of Use (16)
](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1676792&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Team Collaboration (13)
](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1982112&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Board Management (7)
](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1676505&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Poor Usability (6)
](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1676601&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Integrations

**Miro**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3b9a49dfdc49ebd54d82cd969118f88/adobe-creative-suite.png "Product Avatar Image")

Adobe

](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-creative-suite/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_aa578cab3c21b2b0c545c8192e037138/adobe-xd.png "Product Avatar Image")

Adobe XD

](https://www.g2.com/products/adobe-xd/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d8d487b67574b56a5ad57a2f0f159a30/airtable.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Airtable

](https://www.g2.com/products/airtable/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2a3c6c39bf8b8eb277cfcd42d9bbca1e/asana.png "Product Avatar Image")

Asana

](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/integrations)

**iObeya**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2a3c6c39bf8b8eb277cfcd42d9bbca1e/asana.png "Product Avatar Image")

Asana

](https://www.g2.com/products/asana/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_50fc9d80837f26ff97cd6f3b7497832c/cimag-mes.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

CIMAG MES

](https://www.g2.com/products/cimag-mes/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2a9a43b2d4b9db5bdb0ced67c5e23b61/confluence.png "Product Avatar Image")

Confluence

](https://www.g2.com/products/confluence/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_793034d14bb0f3fa12d97cf3cc0032c4/jira.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Jira

](https://www.g2.com/products/jira/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/integrations)

Screenshots

**Miro**
 ![Miro screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1529804/Roadmapping-Miro-AI.png)

**iObeya**
 ![iObeya screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/120045/DSC-5155.jpg)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**Miro**

**9.0** /10

Based on 10,347 responses

**iObeya**

**8.3** /10

Based on 102 responses

Ease of Use

**Miro**

**9.0** /10

Based on 10,526 responses

**iObeya**

**9.0** /10

Based on 108 responses

Ease of Setup

**Miro**

**9.0** /10

Based on 6,870 responses

**iObeya**

**8.6** /10

Based on 88 responses

Ease of Admin

**Miro**

**8.6** /10

Based on 2,582 responses

**iObeya**

**8.4** /10

Based on 66 responses

Quality of Support

**Miro**

**8.7** /10

Based on 6,014 responses

**iObeya**

**8.8** /10

Based on 97 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Miro**

**9.0** /10

Based on 2,322 responses

**iObeya**

**9.0** /10

Based on 61 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**Miro**

**9.2** /10

Based on 9,893 responses

**iObeya**

**9.0** /10

Based on 96 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Collaborative Whiteboard

**8.8** /10

Based on 7,348 responses

**8.2** /10

Based on 51 responses

Visual Collaboration Platforms

**8.6** /10

Based on 6,473 responses

**8.8** /10

Based on 62 responses

Strategy and Innovation Roadmapping Tools

**9.0** /10

Based on 2,755 responses

Not enough data

Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience.

See it for free

Org Chart

**8.2** /10

Based on 102 responses

Not enough data

Mind Mapping

**8.5** /10

Based on 4,994 responses

Not enough data

Strategic Planning and Execution

Not enough data

**7.8** /10

Based on 14 responses

Objectives and Key Results (OKR)

Not enough data

**7.8** /10

Based on 15 responses

Kanban Project Management

Not enough data

**9.0** /10

Based on 34 responses

Customer Journey Mapping

**8.5** /10

Based on 2,220 responses

Not enough data

Prototyping

**7.7** /10

Based on 586 responses

Not enough data

Wireframing

**8.2** /10

Based on 1,312 responses

Not enough data

Product Management

**8.9** /10

Based on 2,115 responses

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
42.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
25.5%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
42.8%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
25.5%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.9%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
50.0%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
19.9%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
50.0%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![Miro](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/f43d71a5c7b1abb1b7d3dfc8d3668f9b/miro.svg "Miro")](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews)
Miro

Computer Software
12.9%

Information Technology and Services
12.6%

Design
5.8%

Marketing and Advertising
4.6%

Financial Services
4.1%

Other
60.1%

[![iObeya](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8f8f958b39b64a3b1c5125390830174/iobeya.svg "iObeya")](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews)
iObeya

Pharmaceuticals
10.3%

Aviation & Aerospace
8.9%

Oil & Energy
7.5%

Banking
7.5%

Management Consulting
6.8%

Other
58.9%

Alternatives

**Miro Alternatives**

 ![Mural](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/cd5feac1eada8186ed09d1aa7aed7d8e/mural.svg "Mural")

[
Mural
](/products/mural/reviews)

 ![Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e02e4d0701c1bc00190c146b8d01e31b/lucid-software-inc-lucid-visual-collaboration-suite.svg "Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite")

[
Lucid Visual Collaboration...
](/products/lucid-software-inc-lucid-visual-collaboration-suite/reviews)

 ![Visio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/7a8d999cab3a98ccc85f15dc3423d763/visio.svg "Visio")

[
Visio
](/products/visio/reviews)

 ![Creately](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a5cbf0fe4b6a6b5bbd8a2214959c8ba9/creately.svg "Creately")

[
Creately
](/products/creately/reviews)

**iObeya Alternatives**

 ![Mural](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/cd5feac1eada8186ed09d1aa7aed7d8e/mural.svg "Mural")

[
Mural
](/products/mural/reviews)

 ![Klaxoon](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/dd1ad65c99dafa7d0c27a40bcddf77c7/klaxoon.svg "Klaxoon")

[
Klaxoon
](/products/klaxoon/reviews)

 ![Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/e02e4d0701c1bc00190c146b8d01e31b/lucid-software-inc-lucid-visual-collaboration-suite.svg "Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite")

[
Lucid Visual Collaboration...
](/products/lucid-software-inc-lucid-visual-collaboration-suite/reviews)

 ![monday AI Work Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0ecee4762e51bfed79001cde447b63a5/monday-com.svg "monday AI Work Platform")

[
monday AI Work Platform
](/products/monday-com/reviews)

## Miro vs iObeya FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between iObeya vs Miro?

Miro stands out for its broader feature set and higher G2 rating, while iObeya is favored for structured program management and enterprise use.

| [iObeya](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews) | [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (150 reviews) | 4.6/5 (13,505 reviews) |
| Enterprise | Small-Business |
| 8.6 | 9.0 |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Program management and structured collaboration | Flexible visual collaboration and creative brainstorming |

### How do the pricing models of iObeya and Miro compare?

Miro is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its pricing compared to iObeya.

- **iObeya:** In recent reviews, several buyers cite unclear pricing and a perception of higher cost, especially for small teams, with the need to contact sales for quotes.
- **Miro:** Reviewers describe Miro as offering good value, with a free trial and pricing that is considered reasonable for the features provided, though some note that advanced features require paid plans.
- **Switching reasons:** Recent iObeya reviewers mention switching due to cost concerns and a preference for more transparent or flexible pricing models.

### What are the best alternatives to iObeya and Miro?

The top three alternatives to iObeya and Miro are Mural, Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite, and Klaxoon.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [iObeya](https://www.g2.com/products/iobeya/reviews) | 4.5/5 (150) | Enterprise | Pricing perceived as high for small teams; requires sales contact | Program management and structured collaboration |
| [Miro](https://www.g2.com/products/miro/reviews) | 4.6/5 (13,505) | Small-Business | Free trial available; pricing considered reasonable for features | Flexible visual collaboration and creative brainstorming |
| [Mural](https://www.g2.com/products/mural/reviews) | 4.6/5 (1,472) | Enterprise | — | Collaborative whiteboarding and workshop facilitation |
| [Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/lucid-software-inc-lucid-visual-collaboration-suite/reviews) | 4.5/5 (8,825) | Small-Business | — | Diagramming and process mapping |
| [Klaxoon](https://www.g2.com/products/klaxoon/reviews) | 4.6/5 (316) | Enterprise | — | Interactive workshops and meeting engagement |

### Which Visual Collaboration Platforms features should I prioritize when comparing iObeya and Miro?

Buyers comparing iObeya and Miro should prioritize Collaboration, Integrations, Ease of Setup, Customization, and Board Management.

- **Collaboration:** iObeya (13 all-time mentions for team collaboration, 8 for real-time collaboration); Miro (reviewers consistently highlight real-time and flexible collaboration).
- **Integrations:** iObeya (Jira: 16 all-time mentions, Microsoft Teams: 3); Miro (Jira: 572, Box: 409, Asana: 40 all-time mentions).
- **Ease of Setup:** iObeya (8.6), Miro (9.0).
- **Customization:** Miro offers more templates and flexible board structures, while iObeya is noted for structured, business-oriented templates.
- **Board Management:** iObeya (6 all-time mentions for board management challenges); Miro reviewers note board scalability and navigation as key considerations.

### What are the pros and cons of iObeya vs Miro?

Miro's headline strength is flexible visual collaboration, while iObeya excels in structured program management and enterprise coordination.

- **iObeya strengths:** Team collaboration (13 all-time mentions), ease of use (12), structured program and project management, integration with Jira and Microsoft Teams, and centralized information sharing.
- **iObeya trade-offs:** Board management challenges (6 all-time mentions), slower performance with large boards (5), less intuitive for creative tasks, higher perceived cost for small teams, and limited support channels (primarily email, slower response).
- **Miro strengths:** Flexible, creative visual collaboration, extensive template library, strong integrations (Jira: 572, Box: 409, Asana: 40 all-time mentions), real-time editing, and high ease of use (9.0 score).
- **Miro trade-offs:** Large boards can become overwhelming or slow, advanced features require paid plans, and some reviewers note a learning curve for new users.

### Is iObeya or Miro better for small businesses?

Miro is the better fit for small businesses, as reflected by its largest reviewer segment and positive small-business sentiment.

- **iObeya:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers from smaller teams cite higher cost and complexity as barriers.
- **Miro:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers highlight ease of use, flexible pricing, and suitability for creative and collaborative work in small teams.

### Which Visual Collaboration Platforms platform has better integrations?

Miro is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing a broader range and higher mention counts for third-party tool connections.

- **iObeya:** Jira (16 all-time mentions), Microsoft Teams (3), Miro (3); integrations are valued but less frequently cited than for Miro.
- **Miro:** Jira (572 all-time mentions), Box (409), Asana (40); reviewers consistently highlight the depth and variety of integrations as a key strength.

### How do iObeya and Miro compare on customer support?

iObeya and Miro are rated at near-parity for Quality of Support, with iObeya at 8.8 and Miro at 8.7, so reviewers see little difference in support satisfaction.

- **iObeya:** Reviewers note prompt responses but cite slow support and limited channels (primarily email, no live chat or phone), with some delays in resolving integration issues.
- **Miro:** Reviewers describe support as helpful and responsive, with onboarding and resources rated positively, though a few mention occasional delays or unclear documentation.

### Which is easier to implement, iObeya or Miro?

Miro scores higher on Ease of Setup (9.0 vs. iObeya's 8.6), with reviewers describing a smoother and faster implementation experience.

- **iObeya:** Reviewers report that setup can be complex, especially for new users or teams with specialized workflows, and often requires additional internal training.
- **Miro:** Reviewers consistently highlight easy onboarding, intuitive initial setup, and minimal barriers to getting started, especially for small teams.

### Which product has better Collaboration?

Miro is the stronger choice for Collaboration, with higher reviewer scores and more frequent mention of collaborative features.

- **iObeya:** Collaboration (13 all-time mentions for team collaboration, 8 for real-time collaboration); Ease of Use score: 9.0.
- **Miro:** Collaboration is a core theme in recent reviews, with high scores for real-time editing and creative teamwork; Ease of Use score: 9.0; offers additional collaboration features such as commenting, screen sharing, and integrated communications.