Compare Microsoft SQL Server and Neo4j Graph Database 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Microsoft SQL Server
Star Rating
(2,261)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft SQL ServerNeo4j Graph Database
Star Rating
(133)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about Neo4j Graph DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Microsoft SQL Server excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to Neo4j. Users appreciate features like the 'Always On' functionality, which enhances database durability and performance by effectively managing read and write operations.
- Users say that Microsoft SQL Server is particularly user-friendly, even for beginners. The straightforward interface in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) and clear setup steps make it easy to implement, which is a common highlight among recent reviews.
- Reviewers mention that Neo4j shines in modeling complex relationships, making it ideal for applications that require interconnected data. Users find the graph database's ability to represent entities and their relationships intuitively beneficial for their specific use cases.
- According to verified reviews, while Neo4j has a strong ease of setup score, Microsoft SQL Server is noted for its robust performance and reliability. Users often highlight its powerful features for data management and analysis, which contribute to a more comprehensive database experience.
- G2 reviewers note that both products have their strengths in support quality, but Neo4j edges out slightly with higher ratings. Users appreciate the quality of support from Neo4j, which is reflected in their positive feedback about the assistance they receive during implementation and troubleshooting.
- Users report that while Neo4j's Cypher syntax is praised for its beginner-friendly nature, Microsoft SQL Server's integration with other Microsoft tools provides a seamless experience for users already within that ecosystem, enhancing overall productivity and workflow efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft SQL Server
No pricing availableNeo4j Graph Database
AuraDB Free
Free
A fully-managed graph database for free; no commitment required.
- console.neo4j.io
Free Trial
Microsoft SQL Server
No trial information availableNeo4j Graph Database
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
1,854
8.5
73
Ease of Use
8.6
1,870
8.2
75
Ease of Setup
8.1
992
8.7
31
Ease of Admin
8.3
950
8.0
28
Quality of Support
8.3
1,649
8.5
64
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
900
8.8
24
Product Direction (% positive)
8.4
1,825
9.0
68
Features by Category
Management
8.9
153
Not enough data
8.8
153
Not enough data
9.2
158
Not enough data
8.9
153
Not enough data
8.9
156
Not enough data
Maintenance
8.9
154
Not enough data
9.0
159
Not enough data
9.0
154
Not enough data
Security
8.9
153
Not enough data
9.1
155
Not enough data
Management
9.0
149
Not enough data
9.2
151
Not enough data
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.8
142
Not enough data
Support
8.6
145
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.6
144
Not enough data
8.4
151
Not enough data
Security
8.8
148
Not enough data
9.0
148
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
Performance
8.7
144
Not enough data
8.8
141
Not enough data
8.7
147
Not enough data
8.6
145
Not enough data
8.8
146
Not enough data
Database Features
8.9
1287
Not enough data
9.0
1291
Not enough data
8.9
1299
Not enough data
8.7
1266
Not enough data
8.8
1267
Not enough data
8.8
1271
Not enough data
9.1
1291
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.2
21
Availability
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
6.9
13
Performance
Not enough data
7.4
19
Security
Not enough data
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
7.6
15
Not enough data
7.1
14
Support
Not enough data
7.2
15
Not enough data
6.2
15
Not enough data
7.7
17
Configuration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
8.5
56
Not enough data
8.8
57
Not enough data
8.4
54
Not enough data
Integrations
7.8
45
Not enough data
8.2
45
Not enough data
Platform
8.2
50
Not enough data
8.5
53
Not enough data
8.2
45
Not enough data
Processing
8.5
52
Not enough data
8.5
55
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft SQL Server and Neo4j Graph Database are categorized as Database Management Systems (DBMS)
Unique Categories
Microsoft SQL Server is categorized as Relational Databases, Big Data Processing and Distribution, and On-Premise Data Integration
Neo4j Graph Database is categorized as Graph Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft SQL Server
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Neo4j Graph Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Computer Software
13.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
4.3%
Higher Education
2.9%
Other
49.6%
Computer Software
25.2%
Information Technology and Services
16.8%
Internet
5.3%
Telecommunications
4.6%
Hospital & Health Care
3.1%
Other
45.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How could I make much easier the experience with the order of my database?
4 Comments
AF
You can create different tables with your employee information eg employee table, employee roles etc. Then you can create a single view that will pull data...Read more
What is the best way to save your queries?
4 Comments
CA
I recommend that you use the saved querys in plain text or .sql or txt format you can use the same sql server query creator or a notepad +++ tool, they are...Read more
How can I work on the same query if the connection is lost (timeout) and then I reconnect?
4 Comments
JE
When this happens to me in SQL Server Management Studio, I just have to type USE {your database name here} and then select only that statement and execute...Read more
What is neo4j good for?
2 Comments
MR
For the simple friends of friends query, Neo4j is 60% faster than MySQL. For friends of friends of friends, Neo is 180 times faster. And for the depth four...Read more
Is neo4j enterprise free?
2 Comments
JJ
If you are a student aiming to be acquire new-age data science skills; enroll for an academic course and you can use it for free for certification purposes. Read more
What are some of the benefits provided by the neo4j DBMS?
1 Comment
SS
Very easy to grow database schema over timeRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
