2026 Best Software Awards are here!See the list
Compare Microsoft Entra ID and PingFederate 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (75.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Microsoft Entra ID
Star Rating
(892)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansPingFederate
Star Rating
(34)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PingFederateSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Microsoft Entra ID excels in user experience, particularly with its intuitive layout and easy-to-understand areas. Users appreciate how this design has significantly reduced training time for staff when making configuration changes, making it a strong choice for organizations looking for a user-friendly interface.
- Users say that Microsoft Entra ID's implementation process is straightforward, with many highlighting the ease of initial setup once the agent is installed. This contrasts with PingFederate, where some users have noted that while it is easy to configure connections, the overall onboarding experience can be less seamless.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Entra ID offers robust security features, including single sign-on and multi-factor authentication, which are crucial for organizations managing hybrid environments. This capability is often cited as a key advantage over PingFederate, which, while also secure, does not receive the same level of praise for its security features.
- According to verified reviews, PingFederate shines in its technical support and ease of configuring identity provider (IDP) and service provider (SP) connections. Users have expressed satisfaction with the support they receive for IAM-related issues, making it a reliable option for organizations that prioritize ongoing assistance.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Microsoft Entra ID has a significantly higher volume of recent reviews, indicating a more active user base and up-to-date feedback. This suggests that potential buyers can expect a more current perspective on the product's performance compared to PingFederate, which has fewer recent reviews.
- Users report that while both products have similar scores for ease of setup, Microsoft Entra ID's overall user satisfaction is higher, as reflected in its G2 Score. This suggests that users find it not only easy to set up but also more effective in meeting their needs in day-to-day operations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Entra ID
Azure Active Directory Free
Free
The free edition of Azure AD is included with a subscription of a commercial online service such as Azure, Dynamics 365, Intune, Power Platform, and others.
- Partially Included: Authentication, single sign-on and multifactor authentication (MFA)
- Partially Included: Applications Access
- Partially Included: Authorization and Conditional Access
PingFederate
No pricing availableFree Trial
Microsoft Entra ID
Free Trial is available
PingFederate
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
700
9.4
19
Ease of Use
8.8
705
8.6
19
Ease of Setup
8.6
427
8.6
16
Ease of Admin
8.8
391
8.2
14
Quality of Support
8.7
640
8.9
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
378
8.8
16
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
681
9.4
18
Features by Category
Authentication Options
9.1
236
8.9
17
8.9
207
8.8
16
9.3
225
9.1
17
8.8
210
9.2
17
8.8
178
9.1
16
8.9
165
9.2
16
Access Control Types
8.9
202
8.9
17
8.9
196
8.8
17
9.0
198
9.0
16
8.8
173
8.8
16
8.8
173
8.9
14
Administration
8.9
195
8.6
16
9.0
204
8.9
17
8.8
216
8.6
16
8.7
214
8.5
17
9.0
199
9.0
15
Platform
8.8
177
8.9
16
8.9
174
8.6
17
9.0
192
8.8
16
8.8
169
8.7
17
8.9
188
8.9
16
8.7
187
8.5
16
8.7
165
9.0
15
User on/off Boarding
8.9
72
|
Verified
8.6
7
8.7
75
|
Verified
8.6
7
9.1
82
|
Verified
9.2
8
9.2
82
|
Verified
8.8
8
9.0
80
|
Verified
9.0
7
8.9
71
|
Verified
8.8
7
User Maintenance
9.0
77
|
Verified
8.6
7
8.5
74
|
Verified
8.3
7
8.7
73
|
Verified
7.6
7
Governance
8.9
79
|
Verified
8.8
7
8.9
74
|
Verified
8.6
7
Administration
8.8
80
|
Verified
8.8
7
8.4
67
|
Verified
9.4
6
8.9
82
|
Verified
8.3
7
8.9
74
|
Verified
9.4
6
Authentication type
8.1
159
Not enough data
7.3
141
Not enough data
8.5
154
Not enough data
7.8
139
Not enough data
8.8
161
Not enough data
8.7
161
Not enough data
8.9
169
Not enough data
8.5
151
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
170
Not enough data
8.6
166
Not enough data
Implementation
8.8
191
Not enough data
8.2
144
Not enough data
8.1
132
Not enough data
Access Control
9.1
176
Not enough data
8.7
165
Not enough data
8.8
158
Not enough data
8.6
152
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
159
Not enough data
8.7
173
Not enough data
8.7
158
Not enough data
8.7
165
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
178
Not enough data
9.2
182
Not enough data
9.0
163
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
89
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
9.0
87
Not enough data
8.6
84
Not enough data
9.4
90
Not enough data
9.1
87
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
87
Not enough data
9.4
90
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
8.9
82
Not enough data
9.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
88
Not enough data
9.0
85
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
81
Not enough data
9.2
81
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.2
88
Not enough data
9.2
88
Not enough data
9.0
83
Not enough data
Reporting
9.1
85
Not enough data
9.2
83
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
86
Not enough data
8.8
92
Not enough data
9.1
112
Not enough data
7.6
100
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
245
Not enough data
8.7
199
Not enough data
9.3
265
Not enough data
8.9
258
Not enough data
9.3
254
Not enough data
9.3
257
Not enough data
Type
8.6
205
Not enough data
9.3
240
Not enough data
Reporting
8.8
211
Not enough data
8.8
219
Not enough data
9.7
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
Authentication & Authorization - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
9.5
25
Not enough data
Administration & Governance - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
Generative AI - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Entra ID and PingFederate are categorized as User Provisioning and Governance Tools and Single Sign-On (SSO)
Unique Categories
Microsoft Entra ID is categorized as Passwordless Authentication, Cloud Directory Services, Privileged Access Management (PAM), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and Identity and Access Management (IAM)
PingFederate has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Entra ID
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PingFederate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.2%
Computer Software
9.5%
Computer & Network Security
6.4%
Financial Services
4.5%
Hospital & Health Care
2.6%
Other
50.9%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Pharmaceuticals
10.7%
Computer Software
10.7%
Computer & Network Security
10.7%
Utilities
3.6%
Other
42.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which is better Google Authenticator or Microsoft authenticator?
3 Comments
SP
MS authenticator Read more
How good is Microsoft authenticator app?
4 Comments
AW
Easy to add accounts and hassle free for every authentication promptRead more
Can Microsoft authenticator app be hacked?
3 Comments
PS
Microsoft Authenticator is mostly second part in two factor authentication & then also code is also refreshed every 30 second or notification with limited...Read more
PingFederate has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
