Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GateKeeper Proximity Authentication
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Hire2Retire
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$3 Per User Per Month
Microsoft Entra ID
Star Rating
(793)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansPing Identity
Star Rating
(106)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$3 Per User Per Month
Learn more about Ping IdentitySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Microsoft Entra ID excels in its "Multi-Factor Authentication" feature, scoring 9.5, which reviewers say provides a seamless and secure user experience. In contrast, Ping Identity's multi-factor authentication scored 8.3, with users mentioning that it could benefit from more intuitive options.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Entra ID's "Single Sign-On" functionality is highly rated at 9.2, making it easy for users to access multiple applications without repeated logins. On the other hand, Ping Identity's single sign-on scored 8.8, with some users expressing a desire for improved integration with third-party applications.
- G2 users highlight the "Role Management" capabilities of Microsoft Entra ID, which scored 9.1, as being particularly robust, allowing for effective user access control. Conversely, Ping Identity's role management received a lower score of 8.7, with reviewers noting that it lacks some advanced features found in Entra ID.
- Users on G2 report that Microsoft Entra ID's "Self-Service Password Reset" feature is rated 9.1, making it easy for users to manage their passwords independently. In comparison, Ping Identity's self-service password administration scored 8.1, with reviewers mentioning that it could be more user-friendly.
- Reviewers say that Microsoft Entra ID's "Automated Provisioning" feature, rated at 9.0, streamlines user onboarding processes effectively. In contrast, Ping Identity's automated provisioning scored 7.5, with users reporting that it can be cumbersome and less efficient.
- Users report that Microsoft Entra ID's "Cloud Directory" feature is rated 9.2, providing a comprehensive solution for managing user identities in the cloud. Meanwhile, Ping Identity's cloud solution scored 8.1, with reviewers mentioning that it lacks some of the flexibility and ease of use found in Entra ID.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Entra ID
Azure Active Directory Free
Free
The free edition of Azure AD is included with a subscription of a commercial online service such as Azure, Dynamics 365, Intune, Power Platform, and others.
- Partially Included: Authentication, single sign-on and multifactor authentication (MFA)
- Partially Included: Applications Access
- Partially Included: Authorization and Conditional Access
Ping Identity
Cloud MFA & SSO
$3
Per User Per Month
Ping Identity's IDaaS for IT Departments
- Unlimited multi-factor authentication
- Unlimited single sign-on
- Included contextual capabilities to balance security with convenience
Free Trial
Microsoft Entra ID
Free Trial is available
Ping Identity
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
628
9.0
72
Ease of Use
8.8
632
8.7
74
Ease of Setup
8.6
355
8.3
49
Ease of Admin
8.8
342
8.3
50
Quality of Support
8.7
572
8.4
66
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
331
8.6
48
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
609
8.4
72
Features by Category
Authentication Options
9.0
209
9.1
35
8.9
200
9.1
32
9.3
201
8.9
31
8.8
202
9.1
33
8.7
170
9.0
31
8.8
160
9.4
27
Access Control Types
8.9
191
8.6
22
8.9
190
8.9
28
8.9
190
8.7
25
8.8
168
8.5
17
8.7
167
9.0
17
Administration
8.9
189
8.9
29
9.0
198
8.7
21
8.9
199
8.2
28
8.7
203
8.5
31
8.9
193
8.1
15
Platform
8.7
172
9.4
27
8.9
170
8.8
25
9.0
186
8.8
31
8.8
164
8.6
25
8.9
180
7.3
22
8.8
176
8.1
27
8.6
161
8.8
23
User on/off Boarding
8.9
71
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
73
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
79
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
77
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
78
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
69
|
Verified
Not enough data
User Maintenance
9.0
74
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
72
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
72
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.9
77
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
72
|
Verified
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
78
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
66
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
80
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
72
|
Verified
Not enough data
Authentication type
8.1
158
8.5
8
|
Verified
7.3
139
8.0
5
|
Verified
8.4
150
8.9
12
|
Verified
7.8
137
8.1
7
|
Verified
8.8
159
9.1
13
|
Verified
8.6
159
7.9
8
|
Verified
8.9
166
8.7
14
|
Verified
8.5
146
8.3
8
|
Verified
Functionality
8.9
168
7.7
10
8.6
164
Not enough data
Implementation
8.9
181
7.8
16
|
Verified
8.2
144
7.2
10
|
Verified
8.1
132
7.9
11
Access Control
9.0
170
Not enough data
8.7
164
Not enough data
8.8
155
Not enough data
8.6
151
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
156
Not enough data
8.7
168
Not enough data
8.7
154
Not enough data
8.7
161
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
168
Not enough data
9.1
172
Not enough data
9.0
160
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
89
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
9.0
86
Not enough data
8.6
84
Not enough data
9.4
88
Not enough data
9.1
87
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
87
Not enough data
9.4
87
Not enough data
9.1
76
Not enough data
8.9
82
Not enough data
9.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
88
Not enough data
9.0
85
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
81
Not enough data
9.2
81
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.2
87
Not enough data
9.2
87
Not enough data
9.0
83
Not enough data
Reporting
9.1
85
Not enough data
9.2
83
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
7
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Authentication Risk Management - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Biometric & Behavioral Analysis - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Context-Aware Security Controls - Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
85
Not enough data
8.8
91
Not enough data
9.1
111
Not enough data
7.6
100
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
226
7.5
10
8.7
193
8.3
8
9.2
223
8.8
14
8.9
216
8.2
15
9.3
223
8.8
17
9.2
222
8.3
16
Type
8.5
198
9.1
11
9.3
218
8.1
16
Reporting
8.8
203
8.3
12
8.8
212
7.4
14
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Authentication & Authorization - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
9.7
6
Not enough data
Administration & Governance - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Generative AI - Identity and Access Management (IAM)
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity are categorized as Passwordless Authentication, Privileged Access Management (PAM), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Single Sign-On (SSO)
Unique Categories
Microsoft Entra ID is categorized as Cloud Directory Services and User Provisioning and Governance Tools
Ping Identity is categorized as Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and Risk-Based Authentication (RBA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Entra ID
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Ping Identity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.3%
Computer Software
9.7%
Computer & Network Security
6.7%
Financial Services
4.7%
Hospital & Health Care
2.8%
Other
49.9%
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Insurance
8.0%
Hospital & Health Care
8.0%
Financial Services
6.0%
Other
53.0%
Discussions
Which is better Google Authenticator or Microsoft authenticator?
3 Comments
SP
MS authenticator Read more
How good is Microsoft authenticator app?
4 Comments
AW
Easy to add accounts and hassle free for every authentication promptRead more
Is Azure Active Directory SaaS or PaaS?
2 Comments
SG
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) is primarily a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) offering provided by Microsoft as a cloud-based identity and access management...Read more
Ping Identity has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
