# Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Vulnerability Management Comparison

---
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is the difference between Tenable Vulnerability... vs Microsoft Defender...?

Tenable Vulnerability Management stands out for its higher G2 rating, stronger reporting, and enterprise focus, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is more prevalent in small-business environments and scores higher on support.

| [Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews) | [Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-defender-vulnerability-management/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (126 reviews) | 4.4/5 (34 reviews) |
| Enterprise | Small-Business |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| 8.0 | 8.7 |
| Reporting Features | Integration with Microsoft ecosystem |



### How do the pricing models of Tenable Vulnerability... and Microsoft Defender... compare?

Reviewers consider Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management the stronger value, as reflected in its higher satisfaction with price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** In recent reviews, several reviewers cite the product as expensive, with recurring mentions of high costs and pricing issues.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers highlight that it is often included with existing Microsoft licensing, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations already using Microsoft products.



### What are the best alternatives to Tenable Vulnerability... and Microsoft Defender...?

The best alternatives to Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management are Qualys VMDR, InsightVM (Nexpose), and Wiz.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Tenable Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-vulnerability-management/reviews) | 4.5/5 (126 reviews) | Enterprise | Expensive, high cost cited in reviews | Reporting Features |
| [Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-defender-vulnerability-management/reviews) | 4.4/5 (34 reviews) | Small-Business | Often included with Microsoft licensing | Integration with Microsoft ecosystem |
| [Qualys VMDR](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews) | 4.4/5 (168 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive vulnerability management |
| [InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://www.g2.com/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews) | 4.4/5 (79 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Asset visibility and risk prioritization |
| [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) | 4.7/5 (844 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Cloud security and risk assessment |



### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management features should I prioritize when comparing Tenable Vulnerability... and Microsoft Defender...?

Buyers should prioritize reporting, integration capabilities, ease of use, asset management, and risk-based prioritization when comparing Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.

- **Reporting:** Tenable Vulnerability Management has 4 all-time mentions for reporting features; Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is frequently cited for integration with Microsoft reporting tools.
- **Integration Capabilities:** Tenable Vulnerability Management has 3 all-time mentions for integration capabilities; Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is highlighted for integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.
- **Ease of Use:** Tenable Vulnerability Management scores 8.9; Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management scores 8.7.
- **Asset Management:** Tenable Vulnerability Management has 4 all-time mentions for asset management; Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is cited for asset visibility in recent reviews.
- **Risk-Based Prioritization:** Tenable Vulnerability Management is noted for its Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) in recent reviews; Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is cited for risk scores and prioritization in recent reviews.



### What are the pros and cons of Tenable Vulnerability... vs Microsoft Defender...?

Tenable Vulnerability Management's headline strength is robust reporting and scanning efficiency, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management excels in integration with the Microsoft ecosystem and cost-effectiveness.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management strengths:** Reporting features (4 all-time mentions), scanning efficiency (8 all-time mentions), ease of use (8 all-time mentions), asset management (4 all-time mentions), automated scanning (5 all-time mentions), and integration capabilities (3 all-time mentions).
- **Tenable Vulnerability Management trade-offs:** Expensive (4 all-time mentions), inadequate or limited reporting (4 all-time mentions), complexity (3 all-time mentions), and pricing issues (4 all-time mentions).
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management strengths:** Integration with Microsoft ecosystem, cost-effectiveness for organizations with Microsoft licensing, ease of use, and asset visibility cited in recent reviews.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management trade-offs:** Limited third-party integrations, reporting customization limitations, and platform coverage primarily focused on Microsoft environments as cited in recent reviews.



### Is Tenable Vulnerability... or Microsoft Defender... better for small businesses?

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is the better fit for small businesses, as it is most prevalent in the small-business segment and praised for its cost-effectiveness and ease of use.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers in smaller organizations cite high cost as a barrier.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers highlight its inclusion with Microsoft licensing and straightforward setup as advantages for small teams.



### Which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management platform has better integrations?

Reviewers favor Tenable Vulnerability Management for broader integration capabilities, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is praised for its integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Integration with ServiceNow, Active Directory, AWS, and Azure is cited in recent reviews, with 3 all-time mentions for integration capabilities.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Integration with Microsoft Intune and other Microsoft security tools is highlighted in recent reviews.



### How do Tenable Vulnerability... and Microsoft Defender... compare on customer support?

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management scores higher on Quality of Support, with a 0.7-point advantage over Tenable Vulnerability Management.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive but note occasional slow responses and room for improvement, with a Quality of Support score of 8.0.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers consistently praise support, citing comprehensive documentation, online resources, and dedicated customer support, with a Quality of Support score of 8.7.



### Which is easier to implement, Tenable Vulnerability... or Microsoft Defender...?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is easier to implement, with a 0.6-point higher Ease of Setup score than Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers frequently mention simple and intuitive implementation, with several citing setup completed in one day and an Ease of Setup score of 8.7.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers note straightforward onboarding, especially for organizations already using Microsoft products, but some mention challenges with device configuration and a lower Ease of Setup score of 8.1.



### Which product has better Reporting?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is favored for reporting, with more frequent reviewer mentions and a higher focus on reporting features.

- **Tenable Vulnerability Management:** Reporting features have 4 all-time mentions, and reviewers highlight robust, informative, and customizable reports.
- **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management:** Reviewers note reporting capabilities but cite limitations in customization and exporting large datasets.



| | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.4 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 34 | 137 | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

**Not enough data**

### Tenable Vulnerability Management

Pros:
- Ease of Use (8 reviews)
- Scanning Efficiency (8 reviews)

Cons:
- Expensive (4 reviews)
- Inadequate Reporting (4 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.5 (31 reviews) | 8.9 (92 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 8.7 (31 reviews) | 8.9 (95 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.1 (15 reviews) | 8.8 (79 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.9 (14 reviews) | 8.7 (73 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.7 (30 reviews) | 8.2 (89 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.6 (15 reviews) | 8.7 (73 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 8.9 (33 reviews) | 9.0 (93 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

No information available

### Tenable Vulnerability Management

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Vulnerability Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tenable Vulnerability Management** | N/A | N/A |

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Search/Filter** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Risk Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Certificate Assessment** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Incident Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automated Containment** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Scanning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Policy Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Asset Discovery** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Penetration Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Runtime Container Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Security Auditing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Threat Intelligence** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Patch Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Endpoint Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Goal Setting/Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Assessment** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Asset Tagging** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Assessment Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Risk Assessment** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **SQL Injections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Vulnerability Scanner

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tenable Vulnerability Management** | 8.3/10 | 58 |

#### Performance

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Issue Tracking** | Not enough data | 8.5 (48 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **Detection Rate** | Not enough data | 9.0 (51 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **False Positives** | Not enough data | 7.3 (52 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **Automated Scans** | Not enough data | 9.2 (54 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **Anomaly/Malware Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Network

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Compliance Testing** | Not enough data | 8.4 (47 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **Perimeter Scanning** | Not enough data | 8.7 (45 reviews) | 
| **Configuration Monitoring** | Not enough data | 8.8 (43 reviews) ✓ Verified | 
| **Vulnerability Scanning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Source-Code Scanning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Web Scanning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Application

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Manual Application Testing** | Not enough data | Feature Not Available | 
| **Static Code Analysis** | Not enough data | 7.5 (34 reviews) | 
| **Black Box Testing** | Not enough data | Feature Not Available | 
| **Risk Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | 7.8 (6 reviews) | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | 7.8 (6 reviews) | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **SSL Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **HIPAA Compliant** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Threat Response** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Endpoint Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Maintenance Scheduling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Security Auditing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Application Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Encryption** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Network Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Authentication** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Financial Data Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Anti Virus** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Secure Data Storage** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Virus Definition Update** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **VPN** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Audit Trail** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Anti Spam** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Escalation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Runtime Container Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Asset Discovery** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Threat Intelligence** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability/Threat Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **SQL Injections** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Threat Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Web-Application Security** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Password Protection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Website Crawling** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Vulnerability Assessment** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management** | 8.7/10 | 27 |
| **Tenable Vulnerability Management** | 8.5/10 | 77 |

#### Risk Analysis

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Risk Scoring** | 8.9 (25 reviews) | 9.0 (61 reviews) | 
| **Reporting** | 8.7 (25 reviews) | 8.1 (63 reviews) | 
| **Risk-Prioritization** | 8.8 (24 reviews) | 8.9 (63 reviews) | 

#### Vulnerability Assesment

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Vulnerability Scanning** | 8.7 (25 reviews) | 9.4 (66 reviews) | 
| **Vulnerability Intelligence** | 8.8 (24 reviews) | 9.1 (60 reviews) | 
| **Contextual Data** | 8.7 (23 reviews) | 8.8 (56 reviews) | 
| **Dashboards** | 8.8 (24 reviews) | 8.3 (60 reviews) | 

#### Automation

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Automated Remediation** | 8.5 (23 reviews) | 7.7 (51 reviews) | 
| **Workflow Automation** | 8.6 (22 reviews) | 7.9 (49 reviews) | 
| **Security Testing** | 8.6 (24 reviews) | 8.1 (52 reviews) | 
| **Test Automation** | 8.8 (20 reviews) | 8.1 (54 reviews) | 

### ServiceNow Store Apps

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tenable Vulnerability Management** | 8.5/10 | 8 |

#### ServiceNow Apps

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **ServiceNow Integration** | Not enough data | 8.3 (7 reviews) | 
| **Value** | Not enough data | 8.3 (7 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps

| Feature | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multi-step Planning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Cross-system Integration** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [Vulnerability Scanner Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner), [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management)


**Unique to Tenable Vulnerability Management (1):** [ServiceNow Marketplace Apps](https://www.g2.com/categories/servicenow-store-apps)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Tenable Vulnerability Management | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 41.2% | 12.9% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 23.5% | 33.1% | 
| **Enterprise** | 35.3% | 54.0% | 

### By Industry

#### Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

- **Computer & Network Security:** 14.7%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 11.8%
- **Higher Education:** 8.8%
- **Retail:** 5.9%
- **Computer Software:** 5.9%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 5.9%
- **Accounting:** 2.9%
- **Banking:** 2.9%
- **Biotechnology:** 2.9%
- **Entertainment:** 2.9%
- **Other:** 35.3%

#### Tenable Vulnerability Management

- **Financial Services:** 14.9%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 14.0%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 9.1%
- **Banking:** 6.6%
- **Computer Software:** 5.8%
- **Government Administration:** 4.1%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 4.1%
- **Telecommunications:** 2.5%
- **Security and Investigations:** 2.5%
- **Pharmaceuticals:** 2.5%
- **Other:** 33.9%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

- [Qualys VMDR](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (168 reviews)
- [Qualys VM](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vm/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (23 reviews)
- [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (311 reviews)
- [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (845 reviews)
- [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (621 reviews)
- [Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management](https://www.g2.com/products/ivanti-autonomous-endpoint-management/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (411 reviews)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (377 reviews)
- [Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/products/orca-security/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (314 reviews)
- [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (333 reviews)
- [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (309 reviews)

### Alternatives to Tenable Vulnerability Management

- [InsightVM (Nexpose)](https://www.g2.com/products/insightvm-nexpose/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (81 reviews)
- [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (845 reviews)
- [Qualys VMDR](https://www.g2.com/products/qualys-vmdr/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (168 reviews)
- [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (220 reviews)
- [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (217 reviews)
- [SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint](https://www.g2.com/products/sentinelone-singularity-endpoint/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (212 reviews)
- [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (129 reviews)
- [Fortra VM](https://www.g2.com/products/fortra-vm/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (71 reviews)
- [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (105 reviews)
- [OpenVAS](https://www.g2.com/products/openvas/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (32 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

No discussions available for this product.

### Tenable Vulnerability Management

- Title: [What is your primary use case for Tenable Vulnerability Management, and how has it impacted your security posture?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-your-primary-use-case-for-tenable-vulnerability-management-and-how-has-it-impacted-your-security-posture) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Hello, good morning!
Well, our first impression was of the completely vulnerable and exposed environment. This was a view we didn't have before Tenable VM...."
- Title: [What is Tenable.io used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-tenable-io-used-for) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "vulnerability and security management."
- Title: [What is tenable io?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-tenable-io) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Tenable.io is user-friendly front end for Nessus scanners that provides a digestible view of all of the data the scanner is picking up. It allows you to..."
- Title: [Please advice on best practices for utilizing API to tie to visualization dashboards such as Power BI, Qlick, or Tableau](https://www.g2.com/discussions/34558-please-advice-on-best-practices-for-utilizing-api-to-tie-to-visualization-dashboards-such-as-power-bi-qlick-or-tableau) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Table"

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-defender-vulnerability-management-vs-tenable-vulnerability-management)