Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Nessus 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (39.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$3,390.00 1 License With One-Time Purchase
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementTenable Nessus
Star Rating
(297)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$3,390.00 1 License With One-Time Purchase
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tenable Nessus excels in automated scans, achieving a high score of 9.0, which reviewers mention significantly reduces the time spent on vulnerability assessments compared to Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which scored 8.7 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Tenable Nessus has a more robust detection rate, scoring 8.8, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's detection capabilities are perceived as slightly less effective, leading to a lower user satisfaction in identifying vulnerabilities.
- G2 users highlight that Tenable Nessus has a higher false positive rate of 6.7, which can lead to unnecessary alerts, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is noted for its better handling of false positives, contributing to a more streamlined user experience.
- Users on G2 appreciate the quality of support for Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, which scored 8.8, indicating a more favorable experience compared to Tenable Nessus, which received a score of 8.4, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance with Microsoft’s product.
- Reviewers mention that Tenable Nessus shines in compliance testing and perimeter scanning, both scoring 8.8, which is crucial for organizations needing to meet regulatory requirements, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management's scores in these areas are not as high, indicating potential gaps in compliance capabilities.
- Users say that Tenable Nessus offers superior risk scoring and prioritization features, with scores of 8.9 and 8.8 respectively, which reviewers believe helps organizations effectively manage their vulnerabilities, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, although competent, does not match this level of granularity in risk management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableTenable Nessus
Pro - 1 Year
$3,390.00
1 License With One-Time Purchase
1-year license of the industry-leading vulnerability assessment solution.
- Automate your vulnerability scanning process
Free Trial
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No trial information availableTenable Nessus
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
29
9.0
245
Ease of Use
8.7
29
8.9
247
Ease of Setup
8.2
13
8.8
169
Ease of Admin
9.0
13
8.9
160
Quality of Support
8.8
28
8.4
227
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
14
8.7
148
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
31
9.0
236
Features by Category
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
139
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.7
137
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
134
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
8.8
135
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
128
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
112
|
Verified
Application
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
85
Not enough data
7.8
104
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Risk Analysis
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.7
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Vulnerability Assesment
8.7
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Automation
8.4
22
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
API Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Asset Management
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
4.7
6
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Risk Management
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Nessus are categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Unique Categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Tenable Nessus is categorized as Attack Surface Management, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and API Security
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tenable Nessus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Retail
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Higher Education
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Information Technology and Services
26.0%
Computer & Network Security
16.7%
Financial Services
7.8%
Computer Software
6.4%
Banking
4.6%
Other
38.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has no discussions with answers
I'm a consultant; can I use Nessus Professional to conduct my client's vulnerability scanning?
2 Comments
AS
Yes, you can.Read more
Is Nessus professional the right product for me?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tenable Nessus
Nessus Professional has always been designed for the security professional. The typical Nessus user is a consultant or contractor who is very experienced...Read more
Can I use Nessus professional data in other applications?
2 Comments
Official Response from Tenable Nessus
Yes. Many third party applications can incorporate a Nessus file. This allows consultants to share the data with their clients’ other applications for the...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
