Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and OpenVAS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (53.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementOpenVAS
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenVASSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenVAS excels in "Vulnerability Scanning" with a score of 8.7, highlighting its comprehensive scanning capabilities that help identify a wide range of vulnerabilities effectively. In contrast, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management also performs well but has a slightly lower score in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management shines in "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.7, making it more user-friendly for those who may not have extensive technical expertise. OpenVAS, while effective, has a lower score of 7.7, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight the "Quality of Support" as a significant differentiator, with Microsoft Defender scoring 8.8 compared to OpenVAS's 6.9. Reviewers appreciate the responsive support team of Microsoft Defender, which can be crucial for businesses needing quick resolutions.
- Users on G2 report that OpenVAS has a strong "Automated Scans" feature, scoring 8.3, which allows for regular and efficient vulnerability assessments. However, Microsoft Defender's overall automation capabilities, including "Automated Remediation" at 8.4, provide a more integrated approach to managing vulnerabilities.
- Reviewers mention that OpenVAS's "Risk Scoring" feature is highly regarded, with a score of 8.9, providing detailed insights into the severity of vulnerabilities. Microsoft Defender, while effective, has a slightly lower score in this area, indicating that OpenVAS may offer more nuanced risk assessments.
- Users say that Microsoft Defender's "Product Direction" is viewed positively at 9.2, suggesting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. In comparison, OpenVAS's score of 8.1 indicates a less aggressive roadmap, which may concern users looking for long-term support and innovation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableOpenVAS
No pricing availableFree Trial
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
No trial information availableOpenVAS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
29
8.5
21
Ease of Use
8.7
29
7.7
21
Ease of Setup
8.2
13
7.9
15
Ease of Admin
9.0
13
7.7
15
Quality of Support
8.8
28
6.9
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
14
7.5
10
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
31
8.1
18
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
6.6
15
Not enough data
8.3
13
Network
Not enough data
7.5
12
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.0
11
Application
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
5.7
9
Not enough data
7.8
13
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.7
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Vulnerability Assesment
8.7
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.7
23
Not enough data
Automation
8.4
22
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and OpenVAS are categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Unique Categories
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
OpenVAS has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenVAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
15.6%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Retail
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Higher Education
6.3%
Other
53.1%
Computer & Network Security
25.0%
Hospital & Health Care
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
10.7%
Computer Software
10.7%
Management Consulting
7.1%
Other
32.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management has no discussions with answers
OpenVAS has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
