Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Microsoft Computer Vision API and Roboflow 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (76.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Microsoft Computer Vision API
Star Rating
(48)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Computer Vision APIRoboflow
Star Rating
(108)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (76.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Microsoft Computer Vision API excels in Object Detection with a rating of 9.4, making it a strong choice for applications requiring precise identification of objects in images. In contrast, Roboflow also offers robust object detection capabilities but shines in Custom Image Detection with a rating of 9.4, allowing users to tailor models to specific needs.
- Reviewers mention that Roboflow's Ease of Setup is particularly impressive, scoring 9.5, which is significantly higher than Microsoft Computer Vision API's score of 8.2. This suggests that users find Roboflow more user-friendly when getting started.
- G2 users highlight the Quality of Support for Roboflow, which received a score of 9.4, indicating that users feel well-supported and valued. In comparison, Microsoft Computer Vision API's support quality, rated at 8.3, may not meet the same level of user satisfaction.
- Users on G2 report that Microsoft Computer Vision API has a strong capability in Facial Analysis with a score of 8.8, making it suitable for applications requiring detailed facial recognition. However, Roboflow does not specifically highlight facial recognition features, which may limit its appeal for users focused on this area.
- Reviewers mention that Microsoft Computer Vision API's Emotion Detection feature, rated at 8.3, is beneficial for applications in marketing and user engagement. Roboflow, while strong in other areas, does not emphasize emotion detection, which could be a deciding factor for some users.
- Users say that both products have strong Integrations, with Microsoft Computer Vision API scoring 9.4, indicating a wide range of compatibility with other tools. Roboflow also offers good integration options, but users may find Microsoft’s offerings more extensive based on their needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Computer Vision API
No pricing availableRoboflow
Public
Free
Best for Testing and Exploration. Data and models are open source on Roboflow Universe.
- 2 users
- $60/mo free credits
- Data labeling suite w/ AI features
Free Trial
Microsoft Computer Vision API
No trial information availableRoboflow
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
39
9.0
104
Ease of Use
8.2
40
9.2
107
Ease of Setup
8.3
39
9.3
105
Ease of Admin
8.4
36
9.3
25
Quality of Support
8.3
34
8.7
98
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
36
9.5
25
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
39
10.0
103
Features by Category
Quality
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.6
59
Not enough data
9.0
59
Not enough data
9.1
60
Automation
Not enough data
8.4
60
Not enough data
8.3
59
Image Annotation
Not enough data
9.1
60
Not enough data
9.1
60
Not enough data
8.4
59
Not enough data
8.6
59
Natural Language Annotation
Not enough data
8.1
54
Not enough data
7.5
53
Not enough data
8.2
53
Speech Annotation
Not enough data
6.8
50
Not enough data
6.8
50
Recognition Type
Not enough data
7.2
76
Not enough data
9.2
86
Not enough data
8.3
78
Not enough data
7.9
76
Not enough data
7.0
73
Not enough data
8.1
78
Not enough data
7.1
73
Not enough data
8.3
76
Facial Recognition
Not enough data
8.1
73
Not enough data
7.7
74
Labeling
Not enough data
9.2
89
Not enough data
9.4
87
Not enough data
9.4
90
Deployment
Not enough data
8.7
87
Model Training & Optimization - Active Learning Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management & Annotation - Active Learning Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Performance & Analysis - Active Learning Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Computer Vision API and Roboflow are categorized as Image Recognition
Unique Categories
Microsoft Computer Vision API has no unique categories
Roboflow is categorized as Data Labeling and Active Learning Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Computer Vision API
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Roboflow
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
12.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.5%
Public Relations and Communications
6.4%
Writing and Editing
4.3%
Information Technology and Services
4.3%
Other
63.8%
Computer Software
14.8%
Research
9.3%
Manufacturing
8.3%
Higher Education
7.4%
Information Technology and Services
4.6%
Other
55.6%
Discussions
Microsoft Computer Vision API has no discussions with answers
Roboflow has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
