Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and ScyllaDB 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Cosmos DBScyllaDB
Star Rating
(356)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ScyllaDBSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ScyllaDB excels in scalability with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking to grow, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB shines with a higher scalability score of 9.4, appealing to enterprises that require robust performance under heavy loads.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's auto sharding feature scores 8.6, which helps in distributing data efficiently, but users on G2 note that Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's auto sharding, with a score of 8.3, is less effective in certain scenarios, leading to potential performance bottlenecks.
- G2 users highlight that ScyllaDB's data replication feature scores 8.6, providing reliable data availability, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers a slightly lower score of 8.1, indicating that users may experience challenges in maintaining data consistency across regions.
- Reviewers say that the quality of support for ScyllaDB, rated at 8.3, is satisfactory, but users report that Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's support, with a score of 8.9, is more responsive and helpful, particularly for enterprise-level clients.
- Users on G2 mention that ScyllaDB's ease of use is rated at 8.6, which is beneficial for small teams, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB's ease of use score of 8.9 suggests a more user-friendly interface that appeals to a broader range of users, including those in larger organizations.
- Reviewers mention that ScyllaDB's data types support is rated at 8.4, which is adequate for many applications, but Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB stands out with a score of 8.8, indicating a wider variety of supported data types that can cater to diverse application needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableScyllaDB
No pricing availableFree Trial
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableScyllaDB
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.6
9
8.8
300
Ease of Use
8.9
9
8.6
309
Ease of Setup
9.0
5
8.3
218
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
115
Quality of Support
8.9
9
8.5
280
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.7
95
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
8
9.2
292
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
8.6
143
Not enough data
8.6
148
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
8.6
141
Performance
Not enough data
8.7
139
Security
Not enough data
8.3
133
Not enough data
8.5
134
Not enough data
8.4
131
Not enough data
8.5
130
Support
Not enough data
8.5
128
Not enough data
8.4
135
Storage
8.5
8
8.4
66
Scalability
9.4
8
9.0
71
8.3
6
8.6
68
Security
8.8
7
8.1
63
Support
8.8
8
8.5
70
7.9
7
8.4
69
9.0
8
8.2
65
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
7.0
5
Configuration
Not enough data
9.2
146
Not enough data
8.8
139
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
8.7
135
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.7
131
Availability
Not enough data
9.4
144
Not enough data
8.9
141
Not enough data
8.9
134
Not enough data
8.8
140
Security
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
8.7
123
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
126
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and ScyllaDB are categorized as Wide Column Database
Unique Categories
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has no unique categories
ScyllaDB is categorized as Key Value Databases and Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ScyllaDB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.8%
Computer Software
23.1%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
15.4%
Insurance
7.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Computer Software
29.3%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Financial Services
5.8%
Education Management
3.5%
Banking
3.5%
Other
45.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
What is the agenda for the coming quarter, what new features will be introduced?
2 Comments
PC
Planned features for Scylla Open Source 4.x and 5.x
• Enhancements to our DynamoDB compatible API (Alternator)
• Faster resumable streaming (Repair base...Read more
ScyllaDB has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
