Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cognitive Search and Glean 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GoSearch AI Enterprise Search
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Lyzr.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Cognitive Search
Star Rating
(11)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cognitive SearchGlean
Star Rating
(139)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GleanSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Cognitive Search excels in its federated search capabilities, scoring 9.5, which allows for seamless integration of multiple data sources, while Glean's score in this area is not available, indicating a potential gap in this functionality.
- Reviewers mention that Glean shines in ease of use with a score of 9.5, making it more user-friendly for non-technical users compared to Azure Cognitive Search, which has a score of 8.6, suggesting a steeper learning curve.
- G2 users highlight Glean's superior search analytics features, scoring 8.6, which provide valuable insights into user behavior, whereas Azure Cognitive Search's analytics capabilities are less emphasized in reviews.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Cognitive Search has a strong global language support score of 8.2, making it suitable for diverse markets, while Glean's capabilities in this area are not specified, potentially limiting its international usability.
- Reviewers mention that Glean's quality of support is highly rated at 9.2, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Azure Cognitive Search has a slightly lower score of 8.7, indicating room for improvement.
- Users say that Azure Cognitive Search's typo tolerance feature, scoring 6.7, is a notable weakness, as it struggles with handling misspellings effectively, whereas Glean's score of 8.2 in this area suggests a more robust handling of user input errors.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cognitive Search
No pricing availableGlean
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Cognitive Search
No trial information availableGlean
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
5
9.2
102
Ease of Use
8.6
6
9.5
107
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.6
14
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
10
Quality of Support
8.7
5
9.2
60
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
10
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
5
9.3
99
Features by Category
Compatibility
Not enough data
9.5
73
Not enough data
9.0
72
Not enough data
8.2
37
Agentic AI - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Search Queries
6.7
5
8.2
73
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.0
64
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.6
58
AI powered search - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
67
Not enough data
8.6
56
Not enough data
9.0
73
Compatibility - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Search Queries - Enterprise Search Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cognitive Search and Glean are categorized as Enterprise Search Software
Unique Categories
Azure Cognitive Search has no unique categories
Glean is categorized as AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cognitive Search
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Glean
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
27.3%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Wholesale
9.1%
Management Consulting
9.1%
Furniture
9.1%
Other
27.3%
Computer Software
49.6%
Information Technology and Services
25.6%
Financial Services
6.0%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Automotive
3.0%
Other
11.3%
Discussions
Azure Cognitive Search has no discussions with answers
Glean has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
