Users report that Proxmox VE excels in scalability with a score of 9.4, allowing businesses to easily expand their virtual environments as needed, while Microsoft Application Virtualization does not provide the same level of scalability, which can be a limitation for growing businesses.
Reviewers mention that Proxmox VE offers superior OS integration with a score of 9.6, making it easier to manage various operating systems within a single platform, whereas Microsoft Application Virtualization, while functional, does not integrate as seamlessly with diverse OS environments.
G2 users highlight that Proxmox VE's resource-saving capabilities score 9.2, enabling efficient use of hardware resources, which is particularly beneficial for small businesses looking to optimize costs. In contrast, Microsoft Application Virtualization has received mixed feedback on resource efficiency.
Users on G2 report that Proxmox VE's data recovery features score 8.6, providing robust options for backup and restoration, which is crucial for businesses concerned about data loss. Microsoft Application Virtualization, however, has been noted to have less comprehensive data recovery options.
Reviewers say that the quality of support for Microsoft Application Virtualization scores 8.5, which is higher than Proxmox VE's score of 7.0, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with Microsoft’s product.
Users mention that Proxmox VE shines in performance management with a score of 9.4, allowing for detailed monitoring and optimization of virtual resources, while Microsoft Application Virtualization's performance management features are perceived as less robust, leading to potential inefficiencies.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.