Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sprocket Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Metasploit
Star Rating
(55)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MetasploitZAP by Checkmarx
Star Rating
(12)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Learn more about ZAP by CheckmarxSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Metasploit excels in its Command-Line Tools, achieving a score of 9.2, which allows for advanced users to perform complex tasks efficiently. In contrast, ZAP by Checkmarx scores lower at 7.6, indicating it may not cater as well to users who prefer command-line interfaces.
- Reviewers mention that ZAP by Checkmarx shines in Vulnerability Scanning, with a score of 9.4, making it a strong choice for users focused on identifying security vulnerabilities quickly. Metasploit, while still effective, has a slightly lower score of 8.7 in this area.
- G2 users highlight that ZAP by Checkmarx offers superior Reporting and Analytics capabilities, scoring 8.8 compared to Metasploit's 7.6. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams needing detailed insights into security assessments.
- Users on G2 report that Metasploit's Manual Testing capabilities score 8.3, which is higher than ZAP by Checkmarx's 7.5. This suggests that Metasploit may provide a more robust environment for manual penetration testing.
- Reviewers mention that ZAP by Checkmarx has a better overall Ease of Use rating of 9.0 compared to Metasploit's 8.0, indicating that ZAP may be more user-friendly for those new to security testing tools.
- Users say that both products have similar Quality of Support ratings at 8.1, but ZAP by Checkmarx's higher overall scores in other areas may suggest a more comprehensive support experience overall.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Metasploit
No pricing availableFree Trial
Metasploit
Free Trial is available
ZAP by Checkmarx
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
42
9.6
12
Ease of Use
8.1
42
9.0
12
Ease of Setup
7.8
22
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
20
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
36
8.1
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
17
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
38
10.0
11
Features by Category
Administration
8.5
9
8.3
12
8.1
13
8.8
12
7.7
14
8.8
12
Analysis
8.1
12
8.1
12
8.6
17
8.2
12
8.7
19
9.4
12
Testing
9.1
20
7.6
12
8.3
21
7.5
12
8.0
16
8.6
12
8.4
19
8.9
12
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Metasploit has no unique categories
ZAP by Checkmarx is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Metasploit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ZAP by Checkmarx
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
34.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Computer Software
7.5%
Security and Investigations
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Other
28.3%
Computer & Network Security
41.7%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Internet
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
8.3%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How do I get Premium License for free to make tests for local FinTech & Universities and education?
2 Comments
HF
The best way to pass in Isaca CRISC Exams provided by exactinside.
Visit Page: https://www.exactinside.com/CRISC-exactdumps.html Read more
<>?:"{}!@#$%^&*()_+ I like that Rapid7 provides the required number of characters.
1 Comment
AL
test2<%= 7*7 %> x *{7*7}Read more
Metasploit has no more discussions with answers
ZAP by Checkmarx has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
