Link copied to clipboard

# Metasploit vs ZAP by Checkmarx Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/metasploit/zap-by-checkmarx/export.csv)

MetasploitZAP by Checkmarx[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Metasploit** [

4.6/5(55)

](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews#reviews)

**ZAP by Checkmarx** [

4.7/5(14)

](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Metasploit**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Free Trial

**Free** · Open source

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Metasploit**
$$$$$

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough reviews yet

Average Discount

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Metasploit**
[
Pentesting Efficiency (2)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978658&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Expertise (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978657&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Complex Setup (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978656&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
[
Ease of Use (6)
](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1459519&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Automation (5)
](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1459578&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
False Positives (3)
](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1459527&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Poor Documentation (2)
](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1459568&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Metasploit**

8.9

8.942

**ZAP by Checkmarx**

9.6

9.612

Ease of Use

**Metasploit**

8.1

8.142

**ZAP by Checkmarx**

9.0

9.012

Ease of Setup

**Metasploit**

7.8

7.822

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**Metasploit**

8.3

8.320

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Metasploit**

8.2

8.236

**ZAP by Checkmarx**

8.1

8.112

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Metasploit**

8.7

8.717

**ZAP by Checkmarx**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Metasploit**

9.1

9.138

**ZAP by Checkmarx**

10.0

10.011

Features

Penetration Testing[Hide 39 FeaturesShow 39 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.4

23

8.4

13

Administration

API

8.5(won by 0.2)

9

8.3

12

Extensibility

8.1

13

8.8(won by 0.7)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Reporting and Analytics

7.7

14

8.8(won by 1.1)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Analysis

Issue Tracking

8.1(tied score)

12

8.1(tied score)

12

Reconnaissance

8.6(won by 0.4)

17

8.2

12

Vulnerability Scan

8.7

19

9.4(won by 0.7)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automatic Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

SPA Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing

Command-Line Tools

9.1(won by 1.5)

20

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

7.6

12

Manual Testing

8.3(won by 0.8)

21

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

7.5

12

Test Automation

8.0

16

8.6(won by 0.6)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Performance and Reliability

8.4

19

8.9(won by 0.5)

12

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Additional Functionality

Network Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assignment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Integration Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Remediation Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-User Collaboration

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Web-Application Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Network Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Password Cracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Simulated Threat Attacks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Certificates

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-Site Scripting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Exploit Frameworks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 2 feature categories with incomplete data

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)[Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Administration

API / Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Extensibility

Not enough data

Not enough data

Analysis

Reporting and Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Static Code Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scan

Not enough data

Not enough data

Code Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing

Manual Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Test Automation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Compliance Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Black-Box Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Detection Rate

Not enough data

Not enough data

False Positives

Not enough data

Not enough data

Red Teaming Tools[Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Emulation & Operations - Red Teaming Tools

Command & Control Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Lateral Movement Simulation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Post-Exploitation Workflows

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-Stage Attack Campaigns

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK & Reporting - Red Teaming Tools

Detection Gap Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Campaign Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Red Teaming - Red Teaming Tools

AI-Assisted Remediation Recommendations

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Generated Attack Paths

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Detection Coverage Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)

Metasploit

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

47.2%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

39.6%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

13.2%

[![ZAP by Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/846d9e925f3777d617abc9156230d88f/zap-by-checkmarx.svg "ZAP by Checkmarx")](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews)

ZAP by Checkmarx

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

76.9%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

7.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

15.4%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

47.2%

76.9%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

39.6%

7.7%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

13.2%

15.4%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)
Metasploit

Computer & Network Security

34.0%

Information Technology and Services

22.6%

Computer Software

7.5%

Security and Investigations

3.8%

Computer Networking

3.8%

Other

28.3%

[![ZAP by Checkmarx](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/846d9e925f3777d617abc9156230d88f/zap-by-checkmarx.svg "ZAP by Checkmarx")](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews)
ZAP by Checkmarx

Computer & Network Security

41.7%

Information Technology and Services

25.0%

Computer Software

16.7%

Internet

8.3%

Hospital & Health Care

8.3%

Other

0.0%

FAQs

## Metasploit vs ZAP by Checkmarx FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 16, 2026

### What is the difference between Metasploit vs ZAP by Checkmarx?

ZAP by Checkmarx stands out for its higher ease of use and integration capabilities, while Metasploit is recognized for its extensive toolkit and penetration testing efficiency.

| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | [ZAP by Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | 4.7/5 (14 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 7.8 | — |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Pentesting Efficiency | Easy Integrations |

### How do the pricing models of Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx compare?

ZAP by Checkmarx is favored by reviewers for affordability and value, while Metasploit is recognized for its comprehensive toolkit but does not receive the same value-focused praise.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers highlight its extensive penetration testing features and toolkit, but do not specifically cite affordability or value as a standout benefit.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** Reviewers consistently mention its affordability and cost efficiency, with one reviewer calling it a "cost efficient (open-source) solution" and another noting it is "free of cost."

### What are the best alternatives to Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx?

The top 3 alternatives to Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx are GitLab, Burp Suite, and Acunetix by Invicti.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | — | — | Pentesting Efficiency |
| [ZAP by Checkmarx](https://www.g2.com/products/zap-by-checkmarx/reviews) | 4.7/5 (14 reviews) | — | Affordable | Easy Integrations |
| [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (902 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |
| [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |
| [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) | 4.1/5 (105 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |

### Which Penetration Testing features should I prioritize when comparing Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx?

Buyers should prioritize ease of use, integration capabilities, reporting quality, automation, and affordability when comparing Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx.

- **Ease of Use:** Metasploit 8.1, ZAP by Checkmarx 9.0
- **Integration Capabilities:** ZAP by Checkmarx has 3 all-time mentions for easy integrations; Metasploit does not have recent integration mentions.
- **Reporting Quality:** ZAP by Checkmarx has 1 all-time mention for reporting quality; Metasploit does not have recent reporting mentions.
- **Automation:** ZAP by Checkmarx has 1 all-time mention for automation and automated testing; Metasploit reviewers note a desire for more automation features.
- **Affordability:** ZAP by Checkmarx is cited as affordable and cost-efficient in recent reviews; Metasploit does not have recent value or affordability mentions.

### What are the pros and cons of Metasploit vs ZAP by Checkmarx?

Metasploit's headline strength is its comprehensive penetration testing toolkit, while ZAP by Checkmarx is praised for easy integrations and affordability.

- **Metasploit strengths:** Pentesting efficiency (2 all-time mentions), expertise (1 all-time mention), extensive exploit and payload database, and regular updates.
- **Metasploit trade-offs:** Complex setup (1 all-time mention), steep learning curve for beginners, and occasional issues with outdated exploit databases.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx strengths:** Easy integrations (3 all-time mentions), pentesting efficiency (3 all-time mentions), customizability (2 all-time mentions), user-friendly interface, affordability, and strong automation features.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx trade-offs:** False positives (3 all-time mentions), poor documentation (2 all-time mentions), limited scope, navigation problems, and slow performance for large applications.

### Is Metasploit or ZAP by Checkmarx better for small businesses?

ZAP by Checkmarx is the better fit for small businesses, with reviewers highlighting its affordability and ease of use.

- **Metasploit:** No small-business segment data available; reviewers note a steep learning curve and complex setup, which may be challenging for smaller teams without dedicated security expertise.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** No small-business segment data available; reviewers consistently praise its cost efficiency, user-friendly interface, and easy setup, making it attractive for small business adoption.

### Which Penetration Testing platform has better integrations?

ZAP by Checkmarx is favored by reviewers for integrations, with multiple mentions of easy integration with CI/CD tools and automation pipelines.

- **Metasploit:** No recent reviewer-cited integrations.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** Reviewers mention easy integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and automation pipelines, with 3 all-time mentions for easy integrations and 2 for integrations overall.

### How do Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx compare on customer support?

Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx are at near-parity on Quality of Support, with scores of 8.2 and 8.1 respectively.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers describe support as generally responsive, though some note occasional delays or limited documentation.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** Reviewers mention that support is helpful but documentation could be improved, with some citing the need for more comprehensive resources.

### Which is easier to implement, Metasploit or ZAP by Checkmarx?

Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx are at parity on Ease of Setup, with Metasploit scoring 7.8 and ZAP by Checkmarx receiving consistently positive setup feedback in reviews.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers note that setup can be complex for beginners, with a learning curve but ultimately manageable for experienced users.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** Reviewers consistently highlight easy and quick setup, with several describing the initial installation as straightforward and user-friendly.

### Which product has better API?

Both Metasploit and ZAP by Checkmarx are recognized for their API capabilities, with reviewers citing API usage and flexibility in both products.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers mention a handy API and custom script support, with positive sentiment around extensibility.
- **ZAP by Checkmarx:** Reviewers highlight API bindings for integration into pipelines and automation, with recent reviews noting ease of use for API-driven scans.

Alternatives

**Metasploit Alternatives**

 ![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")

[
Burp Suite
](/products/burp-suite/reviews)

 ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)")

[
Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)
](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews)

 ![Core Impact](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3035052d6bfeb5a52ef3d5aa9204586d/core-impact.svg "Core Impact")

[
Core Impact
](/products/core-impact/reviews)

 ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti")

[
Invicti
](/products/invicti/reviews)

**ZAP by Checkmarx Alternatives**

 ![Astra Pentest](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/f04194bbb96125a9c3dd43547c09aac3/astra-pentest.svg "Astra Pentest")

[
Astra Pentest
](/products/astra-pentest/reviews)

 ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab")

[
GitLab
](/products/gitlab/reviews)

 ![Tenable Nessus](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/127e03b7d601741c15306f07b0f8cf84/tenable-nessus.svg "Tenable Nessus")

[
Tenable Nessus
](/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)

 ![Harness Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/475270ef4d082eb00bedc920f653506d/harness-platform.svg "Harness Platform")

[
Harness Platform
](/products/harness-platform/reviews)

## Metasploit vs ZAP by Checkmarx

- Reviewers felt that ZAP by Checkmarx meets the needs of their business better than Metasploit.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Metasploit is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of ZAP by Checkmarx over Metasploit.