Users report that Metasploit excels in its Command-Line Tools, achieving a score of 9.2, which allows for advanced users to perform complex tasks efficiently. In contrast, ZAP by Checkmarx scores lower at 7.6, indicating it may not cater as well to users who prefer command-line interfaces.
Reviewers mention that ZAP by Checkmarx shines in Vulnerability Scanning, with a score of 9.4, making it a strong choice for users focused on identifying security vulnerabilities quickly. Metasploit, while still effective, has a slightly lower score of 8.7 in this area.
G2 users highlight that ZAP by Checkmarx offers superior Reporting and Analytics capabilities, scoring 8.8 compared to Metasploit's 7.6. This feature is particularly beneficial for teams needing detailed insights into security assessments.
Users on G2 report that Metasploit's Manual Testing capabilities score 8.3, which is higher than ZAP by Checkmarx's 7.5. This suggests that Metasploit may provide a more robust environment for manual penetration testing.
Reviewers mention that ZAP by Checkmarx has a better overall Ease of Use rating of 9.0 compared to Metasploit's 8.0, indicating that ZAP may be more user-friendly for those new to security testing tools.
Users say that both products have similar Quality of Support ratings at 8.1, but ZAP by Checkmarx's higher overall scores in other areas may suggest a more comprehensive support experience overall.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.