Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Metasploit and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sprocket Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Metasploit
Star Rating
(55)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MetasploitVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that the Veracode Application Security Platform excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for teams focused on early-stage vulnerability detection. In contrast, Metasploit shines in Manual Testing with a score of 8.3, appealing to users who prioritize hands-on testing methods.
- Reviewers mention that Metasploit offers superior Command-Line Tools with a score of 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for advanced users who prefer scripting and automation. Meanwhile, Veracode has a solid performance in API / Integrations with a score of 8.5, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows.
- G2 users highlight that Veracode provides robust Reporting and Analytics features, scoring 8.3, which helps teams track vulnerabilities effectively. On the other hand, Metasploit is noted for its Vulnerability Scan capabilities, scoring 8.7, which allows for comprehensive assessments of security posture.
- Users on G2 report that Metasploit has a higher Detection Rate at 8.0, which is crucial for organizations needing to identify threats quickly. In contrast, Veracode has a lower score for False Positives at 7.8, indicating that it may require more manual review to filter out non-issues.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode has a more favorable Quality of Support rating at 8.0, suggesting that users feel more supported in their security efforts. Conversely, Metasploit has a slightly lower score of 8.1, which may impact user experience for those needing assistance.
- Users say that Metasploit is particularly effective for Compliance Testing with a score of 8.3, making it a strong choice for organizations needing to meet regulatory requirements. In contrast, Veracode is noted for its Product Direction score of 6.3, indicating some concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Metasploit
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Metasploit
Free Trial is available
Veracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
42
8.1
19
Ease of Use
8.1
42
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
7.8
22
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
8.3
20
7.4
7
Quality of Support
8.2
36
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
17
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
38
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
7.7
14
Not enough data
Analysis
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.7
19
Not enough data
Testing
9.1
20
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Metasploit and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Metasploit has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, Static Code Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Metasploit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
34.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Computer Software
7.5%
Security and Investigations
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Other
28.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Discussions
How do I get Premium License for free to make tests for local FinTech & Universities and education?
2 Comments
HF
The best way to pass in Isaca CRISC Exams provided by exactinside.
Visit Page: https://www.exactinside.com/CRISC-exactdumps.html Read more
<>?:"{}!@#$%^&*()_+ I like that Rapid7 provides the required number of characters.
1 Comment
AL
test2<%= 7*7 %> x *{7*7}Read more
Metasploit has no more discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
