Link copied to clipboard

# Metasploit vs SQLmap Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/metasploit/sqlmap/export.csv)

MetasploitSQLmap[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**Metasploit** [

4.6/5(55)

](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews#reviews)

**SQLmap** [

4.3/5(38)

](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlmap/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**Metasploit**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**SQLmap**
No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**SQLmap**
Not enough reviews yet

Return on Investment

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**SQLmap**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**Metasploit**
$$$$$

**SQLmap**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**Metasploit**
Not enough reviews yet

**SQLmap**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**Metasploit**
[
Pentesting Efficiency (2)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978658&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Expertise (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978657&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Complex Setup (1)
](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1978656&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**SQLmap**
Not enough data

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**Metasploit**

8.9

8.942

**SQLmap**

8.2

8.235

Ease of Use

**Metasploit**

8.1

8.142

**SQLmap**

8.2

8.235

Ease of Setup

**Metasploit**

7.8

7.822

**SQLmap**
Not enough data

Ease of Admin

**Metasploit**

8.3

8.320

**SQLmap**
Not enough data

Quality of Support

**Metasploit**

8.2

8.236

**SQLmap**

8.7

8.731

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**Metasploit**

8.7

8.717

**SQLmap**
Not enough data

Product Direction (% positive)

**Metasploit**

9.1

9.138

**SQLmap**

7.0

7.035

Features

Penetration Testing[Hide 39 FeaturesShow 39 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.4

23

8.2

36

Administration

API

8.5(won by 0.2)

9

8.3

25

Extensibility

8.1(won by 0.3)

13

7.8

28

Reporting and Analytics

7.7(tied score)

14

7.7(tied score)

30

Analysis

Issue Tracking

8.1(won by 0.1)

12

8.0

29

Reconnaissance

8.6(won by 0.4)

17

8.2

30

Vulnerability Scan

8.7(won by 0.3)

19

8.4

32

Compliance Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automatic Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

SPA Scans

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing

Command-Line Tools

9.1(won by 0.3)

20

8.8

32

Manual Testing

8.3(won by 0.4)

21

7.9

30

Test Automation

8.0

16

8.6(won by 0.6)

31

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Performance and Reliability

8.4(won by 0.4)

19

8.0

32

Additional Functionality

Network Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Dashboard

Not enough data

Not enough data

SQL Injections

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Threat Intelligence

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assignment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Integration Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Asset Discovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Remediation Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-User Collaboration

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Web-Application Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Assessment

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Auditing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Runtime Container Security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Network Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Password Cracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Simulated Threat Attacks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Certificates

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-Time Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Cross-Site Scripting

Not enough data

Not enough data

Exploit Frameworks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Red Teaming Tools[Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Emulation & Operations - Red Teaming Tools

Command & Control Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Lateral Movement Simulation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Post-Exploitation Workflows

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multi-Stage Attack Campaigns

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK & Reporting - Red Teaming Tools

Detection Gap Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Not enough data

Not enough data

Adversary Campaign Reporting

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Red Teaming - Red Teaming Tools

AI-Assisted Remediation Recommendations

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Generated Attack Paths

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI-Powered Detection Coverage Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)

Metasploit

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

47.2%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

39.6%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

13.2%

[![SQLmap](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0c7a42988b3f8636634ea5dcddfb64f2/sqlmap.jpg "SQLmap")](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlmap/reviews)

SQLmap

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

48.6%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

40.5%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

10.8%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

47.2%

48.6%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

39.6%

40.5%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

13.2%

10.8%

Reviewers' Industry

[![Metasploit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_bbb8392f9e5dedc53d202a2327302a06/metasploit.jpg "Metasploit")](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews)
Metasploit

Computer & Network Security

34.0%

Information Technology and Services

22.6%

Computer Software

7.5%

Security and Investigations

3.8%

Computer Networking

3.8%

Other

28.3%

[![SQLmap](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_0c7a42988b3f8636634ea5dcddfb64f2/sqlmap.jpg "SQLmap")](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlmap/reviews)
SQLmap

Computer Software

40.5%

Computer & Network Security

21.6%

Information Technology and Services

18.9%

Media Production

2.7%

Hospitality

2.7%

Other

13.5%

FAQs

## Metasploit vs SQLmap FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 15, 2026

### What is the difference between Metasploit vs SQLmap?

Metasploit and SQLmap differ most clearly in their core focus, with Metasploit offering a comprehensive penetration testing toolkit and SQLmap specializing in automated SQL injection detection and exploitation.

| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | [SQLmap](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlmap/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | 4.3/5 (38 reviews) |
| Small-Business | Small-Business |
| 7.8 | — |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Pentesting Efficiency (2 all-time mentions) | — |

### How do the pricing models of Metasploit and SQLmap compare?

SQLmap is rated higher for value by reviewers, with a stronger satisfaction score on price and cost-related dimensions.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers highlight its comprehensive toolkit but do not emphasize value or cost advantages in recent reviews.
- **SQLmap:** In recent reviews, SQLmap is praised for being open-source and free, with many users noting its strong value for penetration testing tasks.

### What are the best alternatives to Metasploit and SQLmap?

The top three alternatives to Metasploit and SQLmap are Burp Suite, Acunetix by Invicti, and Core Impact.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Metasploit](https://www.g2.com/products/metasploit/reviews) | 4.6/5 (55 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Pentesting Efficiency (2 all-time mentions) |
| [SQLmap](https://www.g2.com/products/sqlmap/reviews) | 4.3/5 (38 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |
| [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) | 4.8/5 (129 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | — |
| [Acunetix by Invicti](https://www.g2.com/products/acunetix-by-invicti/reviews) | 4.1/5 (105 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Core Impact](https://www.g2.com/products/core-impact/reviews) | 4.1/5 (30 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |

### Which Penetration Testing features should I prioritize when comparing Metasploit and SQLmap?

Buyers comparing Metasploit and SQLmap should prioritize exploit coverage, automation, ease of setup, quality of support, and integration capabilities.

- **Exploit Coverage:** Metasploit is frequently cited for its extensive database of exploits and payloads, with 2 all-time mentions for pentesting efficiency; SQLmap specializes in SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- **Automation:** Metasploit reviewers mention automation as a desired improvement, while SQLmap is praised for automating SQL injection detection and exploitation.
- **Ease of Setup:** Metasploit scores 7.8 on Ease of Setup; SQLmap's score is not available, but recent reviews note its ease of installation and use.
- **Quality of Support:** Metasploit scores 8.2; SQLmap scores 8.7, indicating higher reviewer satisfaction with support.
- **Integration Capabilities:** Metasploit reviewers mention integration with other security tools, while SQLmap reviews do not highlight integrations.

### What are the pros and cons of Metasploit vs SQLmap?

Metasploit's headline strength is its comprehensive penetration testing toolkit, while SQLmap excels in automating SQL injection detection and exploitation.

- **Metasploit strengths:** Comprehensive exploit and payload database, pentesting efficiency (2 all-time mentions), expertise (1 all-time mention), integration with other security tools, and regular updates.
- **Metasploit trade-offs:** Complex setup (1 all-time mention), steep learning curve for beginners, occasional outdated exploit database, and user interface complexity.
- **SQLmap strengths:** Automation of SQL injection detection and exploitation, open-source and free, ease of installation, and strong support for multiple database management systems.
- **SQLmap trade-offs:** Command-line interface can be challenging for some users, occasional false positives, and limited to SQL injection vulnerabilities.

### Is Metasploit or SQLmap better for small businesses?

Metasploit and SQLmap are both widely used by small businesses, but Metasploit is more frequently cited for pentesting efficiency in small-business reviews.

- **Metasploit:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers highlight its comprehensive toolkit and pentesting efficiency.
- **SQLmap:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers praise its automation and value, especially for SQL injection testing.

### Which Penetration Testing platform has better integrations?

Metasploit is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing its ability to connect with other security tools, while SQLmap reviews do not highlight integrations.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers mention integration with vulnerability scanners, network analyzers, and IDS/IPS systems in recent reviews.
- **SQLmap:** No integrations are highlighted in recent reviews.

### How do Metasploit and SQLmap compare on customer support?

SQLmap scores higher on Quality of Support, with a 0.5-point advantage over Metasploit (8.7 vs 8.2).

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers describe support as generally positive but note occasional delays and a desire for more detailed documentation.
- **SQLmap:** Reviewers consistently praise the support experience, citing helpful documentation and a strong user community.

### Which is easier to implement, Metasploit or SQLmap?

Metasploit and SQLmap are at parity on Ease of Setup, with Metasploit scoring 7.8 and SQLmap receiving positive qualitative feedback for ease of installation.

- **Metasploit:** Reviewers note that setup can be complex for beginners but is manageable with available tutorials and documentation.
- **SQLmap:** Reviewers highlight ease of installation and use, especially for automating SQL injection testing tasks.

Alternatives

**Metasploit Alternatives**

 ![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")

[
Burp Suite
](/products/burp-suite/reviews)

 ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)")

[
Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)
](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews)

 ![Core Impact](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3035052d6bfeb5a52ef3d5aa9204586d/core-impact.svg "Core Impact")

[
Core Impact
](/products/core-impact/reviews)

 ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti")

[
Invicti
](/products/invicti/reviews)

**SQLmap Alternatives**

 ![Burp Suite](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1084a0792dcd7344d19c56aea015669c/burp-suite.svg "Burp Suite")

[
Burp Suite
](/products/burp-suite/reviews)

 ![Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/8b9bbc1b8758727122569ca626a30959/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix.svg "Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)")

[
Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix)
](/products/invicti-web-api-formerly-acunetix/reviews)

 ![Invicti](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/3bee4d2b732dab5368b9a8aa21f05e30/invicti.svg "Invicti")

[
Invicti
](/products/invicti/reviews)

 ![Intruder](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1539808658/intruder.svg "Intruder")

[
Intruder
](/products/intruder/reviews)

## Metasploit vs SQLmap

- Reviewers felt that Metasploit meets the needs of their business better than SQLmap.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SQLmap is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Metasploit over SQLmap.