Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Metasploit and RidgeBot 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Metasploit
Star Rating
(55)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MetasploitRidgeBot
Star Rating
(93)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RidgeBotSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Metasploit excels in its Command-Line Tools with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for users who favor scripting and automation in their penetration testing workflows. In contrast, RidgeBot's Command-Line Tools received a lower score of 8.6, indicating it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that RidgeBot shines in Test Automation, achieving a score of 9.2, which is significantly higher than Metasploit's score of 8.0. This suggests that RidgeBot offers more streamlined and efficient automated testing capabilities, making it easier for users to conduct regular assessments.
- G2 users highlight RidgeBot's superior Reporting and Analytics features, scoring 9.1 compared to Metasploit's 7.6. Reviewers appreciate RidgeBot's ability to provide detailed insights and actionable data, which enhances decision-making processes for security teams.
- Users on G2 report that Metasploit's Vulnerability Scanning capabilities are strong, with a score of 9.4, but RidgeBot outperforms it with a score of 9.1. This indicates that while both products are effective, Metasploit may offer more comprehensive scanning features that users find valuable.
- Reviewers mention that RidgeBot's Ease of Use is a standout feature, scoring 9.2, which is significantly higher than Metasploit's score of 8.0. This suggests that RidgeBot is more user-friendly, making it easier for teams to adopt and integrate into their existing workflows.
- Users say that Metasploit's Risk Evaluation scored 9.0, indicating a solid performance in assessing vulnerabilities, but RidgeBot's higher score of 9.4 suggests it provides a more thorough and effective risk assessment process, which is crucial for proactive security management.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Metasploit
No pricing availableRidgeBot
No pricing availableFree Trial
Metasploit
Free Trial is available
RidgeBot
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
42
9.0
89
Ease of Use
8.1
42
9.2
90
Ease of Setup
7.8
22
8.9
90
Ease of Admin
8.3
20
9.1
78
Quality of Support
8.2
36
9.0
86
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
17
9.3
75
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
38
9.7
89
Features by Category
Administration
8.5
9
8.5
80
8.1
13
8.6
80
7.7
14
9.0
82
Analysis
8.1
12
8.5
81
8.6
17
8.9
81
8.7
19
9.0
82
Testing
9.1
20
8.5
81
8.3
21
8.1
81
8.0
16
9.1
82
8.4
19
9.2
82
Simulation
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.4
27
Not enough data
8.7
27
Customization
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.5
27
Not enough data
8.6
27
Risk Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
9.1
36
Vulnerability Assesment
Not enough data
9.1
36
Not enough data
8.9
36
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
9.0
36
Automation
Not enough data
8.4
36
Not enough data
8.5
35
Not enough data
8.9
36
Not enough data
9.1
36
Asset Management
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.3
44
Not enough data
8.2
44
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
43
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
8.5
44
Not enough data
8.5
44
Risk Management
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.8
43
Not enough data
8.7
44
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.7
36
Generative AI - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Risk Identification and Assessment - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.3
11
Monitoring and Integration - Exposure Management Platforms
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Metasploit and RidgeBot are categorized as Penetration Testing
Unique Categories
Metasploit has no unique categories
RidgeBot is categorized as Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management, Attack Surface Management, and Exposure Management Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Metasploit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
RidgeBot
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
34.0%
Information Technology and Services
22.6%
Computer Software
7.5%
Security and Investigations
3.8%
Financial Services
3.8%
Other
28.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer & Network Security
20.0%
Consulting
10.0%
Financial Services
7.8%
Government Administration
5.6%
Other
36.7%
Discussions
How do I get Premium License for free to make tests for local FinTech & Universities and education?
2 Comments
HF
The best way to pass in Isaca CRISC Exams provided by exactinside.
Visit Page: https://www.exactinside.com/CRISC-exactdumps.html Read more
<>?:"{}!@#$%^&*()_+ I like that Rapid7 provides the required number of characters.
1 Comment
AL
test2<%= 7*7 %> x *{7*7}Read more
Metasploit has no more discussions with answers
RidgeBot has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
