Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mercurial and OpenText AccuRev 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ServiceNow IT Service Management
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mercurial
Star Rating
(31)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MercurialOpenText AccuRev
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText AccuRevSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText AccuRev has a lower ease of use rating (7.5) compared to Mercurial (8.8), indicating that users find Mercurial more intuitive and user-friendly for daily operations.
- Reviewers mention that Mercurial excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.1, while OpenText AccuRev lacks a clear setup process, making it potentially more challenging for new users to get started.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText AccuRev's product direction score (5.3) is significantly lower than Mercurial's (6.8), suggesting that users feel more confident about the future development and enhancements of Mercurial.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar quality of support ratings, with OpenText AccuRev at 7.8 and Mercurial at 7.6, indicating that users generally find both platforms to provide adequate support, though neither stands out significantly.
- Reviewers say that Mercurial is favored by small businesses, as reflected in its largest market segment (54.8% of reviews), while OpenText AccuRev is more aligned with enterprise users (55.0% of reviews), suggesting a difference in target audience and use cases.
- Users mention that while OpenText AccuRev has a total of 20 reviews, Mercurial has garnered 31 reviews, indicating a broader user base and potentially more diverse feedback on Mercurial's performance and features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mercurial
No pricing availableOpenText AccuRev
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mercurial
No trial information availableOpenText AccuRev
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
30
8.1
20
Ease of Use
8.8
30
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
9.1
9
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
9
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.6
16
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
7
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
29
5.3
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mercurial and OpenText AccuRev are categorized as Version Control Software
Unique Categories
Mercurial has no unique categories
OpenText AccuRev is categorized as Configuration Management and Version Control Clients
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mercurial
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText AccuRev
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.8%
Computer Software
25.8%
Internet
16.1%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Research
3.2%
Other
22.6%
Semiconductors
40.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Computer Hardware
10.0%
Higher Education
5.0%
Other
20.0%
Discussions
Mercurial has no discussions with answers
OpenText AccuRev has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
