Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare McGraw-Hill Connect and Sapling Software 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Speakable
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Synap
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
McGraw-Hill Connect
Star Rating
(176)3.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (40.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about McGraw-Hill ConnectSapling
Star Rating
(10)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SaplingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that McGraw-Hill Connect excels in providing a variety of assessment questions, scoring an impressive 9.0 in question variety, which reviewers appreciate for enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.
- Reviewers mention that Sapling offers superior quality of support, with a score of 8.5, indicating that users find it easier to get help and resolve issues compared to McGraw-Hill Connect, which scored 7.3 in this area.
- G2 users highlight that McGraw-Hill Connect's progress reporting features are robust, achieving a score of 8.9, allowing educators to track student performance effectively, while Sapling's reporting features lag behind with a score of 7.1.
- Users on G2 note that Sapling shines in its personalized learning paths, scoring 7.6, which helps tailor the educational experience to individual student needs, whereas McGraw-Hill Connect scored lower at 7.1 in this category.
- Reviewers mention that McGraw-Hill Connect's pre-made content is well-aligned to educational standards, scoring 8.3, making it a preferred choice for educators looking for compliant materials, while Sapling's pre-made content scored slightly lower at 8.0.
- Users say that McGraw-Hill Connect's automated grading feature, with a score of 7.9, is beneficial for saving time on assessments, while Sapling's automated grading received a lower score, indicating potential areas for improvement in efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
McGraw-Hill Connect
No pricing availableSapling
No pricing availableFree Trial
McGraw-Hill Connect
No trial information availableSapling
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.9
142
8.5
10
Ease of Use
7.3
142
7.7
10
Ease of Setup
7.5
25
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.5
24
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.3
130
8.5
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
24
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
140
6.5
10
Features by Category
Assessment delivery
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
Grading and reporting
7.9
7
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.7
7
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
Administration
6.3
5
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Learning Content
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
7.3
13
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
Personalization
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
14
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Digital Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting Analysis
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Course Management
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Integration
6.9
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Customer Assistance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Platform Customization
6.7
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Online Learning Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Features
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.1
19
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.2
18
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect and Sapling are categorized as Online Learning Platform
Unique Categories
McGraw-Hill Connect is categorized as Digital Learning Platforms, Study Tools, Assessment, and Classroom Management
Sapling has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
McGraw-Hill Connect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Sapling
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
38.3%
Education Management
24.6%
E-Learning
12.0%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.6%
Accounting
3.0%
Other
15.6%
Higher Education
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
10.0%
E-Learning
10.0%
Education Management
10.0%
Other
40.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
How easy it is for students to get access at home?
3 Comments
JV
It isn't always consistent and even if they can access it they'll wish they never had because this is an awful program.Read more
Sapling has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
