Compare Maze and Respondent 
Maze vs Respondent
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Respondent easier to use. However, Maze is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Maze overall.
- Reviewers felt that Respondent meets the needs of their business better than Maze.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Respondent is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Respondent over Maze.
- 1 study per month
- 5 seats
- Pay-per use panel credits
Allow any user to easily conduct a remote usability test and that it is compatible with the main design software.
I use Maze for surveys too but it needs more functionalities as a survey tool, for example, changing the order of the options and adding images to each option. Also, if you want to do a usability test, you really really need to make sure that the prototype...
I enjoy signing up for focus groups that offer new technologies. Being part of a professional service business, it's my job to ensure that we are using technologies that help us meet our bottom line efficiently and effectively.
There projects are not consistently updated as projects as far as from 3 months ago are still on the website
Allow any user to easily conduct a remote usability test and that it is compatible with the main design software.
I enjoy signing up for focus groups that offer new technologies. Being part of a professional service business, it's my job to ensure that we are using technologies that help us meet our bottom line efficiently and effectively.
I use Maze for surveys too but it needs more functionalities as a survey tool, for example, changing the order of the options and adding images to each option. Also, if you want to do a usability test, you really really need to make sure that the prototype...
There projects are not consistently updated as projects as far as from 3 months ago are still on the website
