- Home
- ...
- Other Web Frameworks Software
- Material Design for Bootstrap
- Ruby on Rails
- Material Design for Bootstrap-vs-Ruby on Rails
Compare Material Design for Bootstrap and Ruby on Rails 
Material Design for Bootstrap vs Ruby on Rails
- Reviewers felt that Material Design for Bootstrap meets the needs of their business better than Ruby on Rails.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Material Design for Bootstrap is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Material Design for Bootstrap over Ruby on Rails.
I like the amount of ready-to-use components such as forms, panels, alerts, tabs. All with the nice appearance of Material Design. It has really amazing CSS animations.
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
- based on Ruby, the most flexible and up-to-date of all programming languages that are in common use today - quick to set up new projects with solid testing and security
Since the framework was introduced lately, the implementation examples and lack of proper documentation was a point of pain for us.
I like the amount of ready-to-use components such as forms, panels, alerts, tabs. All with the nice appearance of Material Design. It has really amazing CSS animations.
- based on Ruby, the most flexible and up-to-date of all programming languages that are in common use today - quick to set up new projects with solid testing and security
I wish it was more user-friendly for more visual designers who don't know how to code.
Since the framework was introduced lately, the implementation examples and lack of proper documentation was a point of pain for us.
