Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare MasterControl Quality Management System and Veeva Vault QualityDocs 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Smart Food Safe
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
FaceUp
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Azumuta
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (65.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (46.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
No pricing available
MasterControl Quality Management System
Star Rating
(498)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (65.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about MasterControl Quality Management SystemVeeva Vault QualityDocs
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veeva Vault QualityDocsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that MasterControl Quality Management System excels in Document Control with a score of 8.5, while Veeva Vault QualityDocs shines even brighter with a score of 8.8, indicating a more robust feature set for managing documents effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Veeva Vault QualityDocs offers superior Ease of Use with a score of 9.4 compared to MasterControl's 7.8, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to streamline their quality management processes.
- G2 users highlight that MasterControl's Audit Management feature scored lower at 6.5, suggesting potential challenges in managing audits, whereas Veeva Vault's approach to compliance and auditing received more favorable feedback, contributing to its higher overall ratings.
- Users on G2 report that MasterControl's Risk Management features, with a score of 6.9, may not meet the needs of all users, while Veeva Vault's comprehensive compliance management tools, including visualization tools, received positive remarks for their effectiveness.
- Reviewers say that MasterControl's training and learning resources scored 8.2, which is commendable, but Veeva Vault's customer support and training options are noted to be more responsive and effective, contributing to a better overall user experience.
- Users report that while both platforms offer integrations, MasterControl's integration score of 7.2 indicates some limitations, whereas Veeva Vault's integration capabilities are often praised for their flexibility and ease of use, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing seamless connectivity with other systems.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
MasterControl Quality Management System
Quality Excellence
Contact Us
Per Year
With all your quality and compliance data in one place, your entire organization can move faster and be more responsive. You’ll also have the new tools and business intelligence that will help you increase profitability and drive business excellence.
- Documents and Change
- Training and Exams
- Incidents and Corrective Actions (CA)
Veeva Vault QualityDocs
No pricing availableFree Trial
MasterControl Quality Management System
No trial information availableVeeva Vault QualityDocs
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
421
8.9
6
Ease of Use
7.8
439
9.4
6
Ease of Setup
7.6
316
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.0
315
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
416
8.9
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
316
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
415
10.0
5
Features by Category
Maintenance of Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality Management
7.1
62
Not enough data
6.7
64
Not enough data
6.9
60
Not enough data
7.0
59
Not enough data
Quality System
6.8
62
Not enough data
7.4
66
Not enough data
8.5
73
Not enough data
7.9
68
Not enough data
Usability
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Reporting
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
Nonconformance
7.6
251
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
263
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
259
|
Verified
Not enough data
Quality system
8.8
289
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
285
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.8
282
|
Verified
Not enough data
Risk Management
7.1
238
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.9
233
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.8
231
|
Verified
Not enough data
Inspection Management
7.3
268
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.0
277
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.5
256
|
Verified
Not enough data
Compliance
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.9
209
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.0
214
|
Verified
Not enough data
Platform
7.3
227
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
249
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.6
228
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
258
|
Verified
Not enough data
Services
7.9
260
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
265
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
268
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
244
|
Verified
Not enough data
Content Management
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Regulatory Compliance
7.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Regulatory Information Management (RIM) SystemsHide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Regulatory Affairs
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - IT Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflows - Audit Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation - Audit Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting & Analytics - Audit Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operational Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Business Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Operational Risk Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Workflow
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
MasterControl Quality Management System and Veeva Vault QualityDocs are categorized as Medical QMS
Unique Categories
MasterControl Quality Management System is categorized as Regulatory Information Management (RIM) Systems, Electronic Trial Master File (eTMF), Complaint Management, IT Risk Management, Quality Management (QMS), Enterprise Content Management (ECM), Operational Risk Management, and Audit Management
Veeva Vault QualityDocs is categorized as Healthcare Compliance
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
MasterControl Quality Management System
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veeva Vault QualityDocs
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Pharmaceuticals
36.0%
Medical Devices
25.3%
Biotechnology
14.1%
Hospital & Health Care
5.1%
Manufacturing
3.8%
Other
15.8%
Pharmaceuticals
61.5%
Research
7.7%
Program Development
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.7%
Other
7.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is MasterControl Quality Management System used for?
1 Comment
JV
It is used for preparing, modifying, reviewing, approving and controlling documented information. Mostly used to store the documented information. For...Read more
MasterControl Quality Management System has no more discussions with answers
Veeva Vault QualityDocs has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
