Users report that Pipl excels in Fraud Detection with a score of 9.5, indicating a robust capability to identify fraudulent activities effectively. In contrast, Ekata also performs well but does not match this level of detection, which may be crucial for businesses prioritizing security.
Reviewers mention that Ekata shines in Real-Time Monitoring with a score of 9.3, providing timely insights that help businesses react swiftly to potential threats. Pipl, while still competent at 8.9, may not offer the same immediacy, which could impact decision-making in fast-paced environments.
G2 users highlight that both products have similar scores in Quality of Support at 9.1, suggesting that users can expect reliable assistance from either provider. However, the overall user experience may vary based on specific support interactions.
Users on G2 report that Pipl's Transaction Scoring feature is highly regarded with a score of 9.5, allowing businesses to assess transaction risks effectively. Ekata's score of 9.4 is also strong, but Pipl's edge may be significant for those heavily reliant on transaction assessments.
Reviewers mention that both platforms offer solid Alerts functionality, with Pipl scoring 9.4 and Ekata slightly higher at 9.5. This indicates that while both provide valuable alert systems, Ekata may have a slight advantage in alerting users to critical issues.
Users say that Pipl's Product Direction score of 7.6 suggests some concerns about future developments, while Ekata's score of 8.8 indicates a more positive outlook on ongoing improvements and feature enhancements, which could be a deciding factor for long-term users.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.