When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Martini easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Martini overall.
Reviewers felt that Martini meets the needs of their business better than MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Martini is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Martini over MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
Is there any way we can support deploying Martini projects to any platform? using any CI?CD
1 Comment
DB
Martini projects are bundled in self-contained Martini Packages which makes them easily transportable from one Martini instance to another.
A Martini...Read more
Do you have a tool for scanning Spring MVC endpoints and automatically import spec
1 Comment
DB
Whilst we don't provide a tool to scan for Spring MVC endpoints, it is possible to import a Java web app into Martini and run it on the same application...Read more
There is any light version available for this app?
1 Comment
DB
Yes there is! To change the default theme follow these instructions:
https://docs.torocloud.com/martini/latest/appendix/gui/theme/Read more
As the name suggests, iPaaS is a development platform for building integration applications. It provides a set of services and capabilities for integrating...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
Your software and services insights are valuable.
Your peers come to G2 to get an inside look at and other business solutions. Adding perspective on will help others pick the right solution based on real user experience.