When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Martini easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Martini overall.
Reviewers felt that Martini meets the needs of their business better than MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Martini is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Martini over MuleSoft Anypoint Platform.
There is any light version available for this app?
1 Comment
DB
Yes there is! To change the default theme follow these instructions:
https://docs.torocloud.com/martini/latest/appendix/gui/theme/Read more
Do you have a tool for scanning Spring MVC endpoints and automatically import spec
1 Comment
DB
Whilst we don't provide a tool to scan for Spring MVC endpoints, it is possible to import a Java web app into Martini and run it on the same application...Read more
What is the best way to deploy it in AWS?
1 Comment
DB
The best deployment option will depend on the problem you are trying to solve.
If Martini is just running some scheduled services that processes some data...Read more
As the name suggests, iPaaS is a development platform for building integration applications. It provides a set of services and capabilities for integrating...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.