Link copied to clipboard # Maple vs Wolfram Mathematica Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/maple/wolfram-mathematica/export.csv) MapleMathematica[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Maple** No pricing available **Wolfram Mathematica** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Maple** Not enough reviews yet **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough reviews yet Return on Investment **Maple** Not enough reviews yet **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough reviews yet Perceived Cost **Maple** Not enough reviews yet **Wolfram Mathematica** $$$$$ Average Discount **Maple** Not enough reviews yet **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough reviews yet **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Maple** Not enough data **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough data Screenshots **Maple** ![Maple screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1905072/Maple2026-Screenshot.png) **Wolfram Mathematica** ![Wolfram Mathematica screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1844194/Mathematica-ComplexPlot3D.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Maple** 8.9 8.911 **Wolfram Mathematica** 8.4 8.478 Ease of Use **Maple** 8.0 8.011 **Wolfram Mathematica** 7.3 7.380 Ease of Setup **Maple** Not enough data **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough data Ease of Admin **Maple** Not enough data **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough data Quality of Support **Maple** 8.5 8.58 **Wolfram Mathematica** 7.9 7.976 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Maple** Not enough data **Wolfram Mathematica** Not enough data Product Direction (% positive) **Maple** 7.9 7.911 **Wolfram Mathematica** 8.1 8.179 **Features** ratings from reviews Simulation & CAE Not enough data 8.5 15 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 21.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 35.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 42.9% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 21.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 35.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 42.9% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 31.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 45.3% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 31.4% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 23.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 45.3% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Maple](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_87c765f5580af1b9d4d195904e264dc7/maple.jpeg "Maple")](https://www.g2.com/products/maple/reviews) Maple Higher Education 28.6% Information Technology and Services 14.3% Computer Software 14.3% Research 7.1% Mechanical or Industrial Engineering 7.1% Other 28.6% [![Wolfram Mathematica](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_ddec2ec87407ae2a61c528156f73b034/wolfram-mathematica.png "Wolfram Mathematica")](https://www.g2.com/products/wolfram-mathematica/reviews) Wolfram Mathematica Research 17.4% Information Technology and Services 9.3% Higher Education 8.1% Automotive 7.0% Computer Software 7.0% Other 51.2% FAQs ## Maple vs Mathematica FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Maple vs Mathematica? Maple stands out for its higher reviewer satisfaction scores and symbolic computation strengths, while Mathematica is noted for its versatility and broad technical computing capabilities. | [Maple](https://www.g2.com/products/maple/reviews) | [Mathematica](https://www.g2.com/products/mathematica/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.3/5 (15 reviews) | 4.1/5 (86 reviews) | | Ease of Setup: 7.0 | Ease of Setup: 7.0 | | Quality of Support: 8.5 | Quality of Support: 7.9 | | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength: Beneficial symbolic computation for complex algebraic expressions and research activities | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength: Versatile tool for symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculations across disciplines | ### How do the pricing models of Maple and Mathematica compare? Maple is favored by reviewers for value, as reflected in its higher satisfaction scores on price and cost-related dimensions. - **Maple:** In recent reviews, users highlight Maple's value for symbolic computation and research, especially in academic settings. - **Mathematica:** Reviewers note Mathematica's broad capabilities but mention its higher cost and that it is best justified for moderate to heavy users. ### What are the best alternatives to Maple and Mathematica? The top three alternatives to Maple and Mathematica are MATLAB, Scilab, and GNU Octave. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Maple](https://www.g2.com/products/maple/reviews) | 4.3/5 (15) | — | — | Beneficial symbolic computation for complex algebraic expressions and research activities | | [Mathematica](https://www.g2.com/products/mathematica/reviews) | 4.1/5 (86) | — | — | Versatile tool for symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculations across disciplines | | [MATLAB](https://www.g2.com/products/matlab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (771) | Small-Business | — | Widely used for technical computing and engineering applications | | [Scilab](https://www.g2.com/products/scilab/reviews) | 4.5/5 (64) | Small-Business | — | Open-source platform for numerical computation | | [GNU Octave](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-octave/reviews) | 4.2/5 (55) | Small-Business | — | Compatible with MATLAB scripts and used for numerical analysis | ### Which Simulation & CAE features should I prioritize when comparing Maple and Mathematica? Buyers should prioritize symbolic computation, ease of use, quality of support, breadth of mathematical functions, and visualization capabilities when comparing Maple and Mathematica. - **Symbolic Computation:** Maple is frequently cited for its beneficial symbolic computation, especially for complex algebraic expressions; Mathematica is also recognized for symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculations. - **Ease of Use:** Maple scores 8.0, Mathematica scores 7.3 on Ease of Use. - **Quality of Support:** Maple scores 8.5, Mathematica scores 7.9 on Quality of Support. - **Breadth of Mathematical Functions:** Mathematica is highlighted for its versatility across symbolic, numerical, and graphical domains. - **Visualization Capabilities:** Both products are praised for visualization, with Mathematica noted for 3D and graphical representations. ### What are the pros and cons of Maple vs Mathematica? Maple's headline strength is symbolic computation for complex algebraic problems, while Mathematica excels in versatility across symbolic, numerical, and graphical domains. - **Maple strengths:** Beneficial symbolic computation, especially for complex algebraic expressions and research activities; helpful for students and researchers in physics, engineering, and mathematics; user-friendly GUI for mathematical operations. - **Maple trade-offs:** Less efficient with large datasets; importing and manipulating large data can be slow and error-prone; some users find the interface less intuitive and the learning curve steep. - **Mathematica strengths:** Versatile tool for symbolic, numerical, and graphical calculations; strong in data visualization, 3D graphing, and technical computing; widely used in academic and research settings for a broad range of mathematical operations. - **Mathematica trade-offs:** Higher cost noted by reviewers; steep learning curve, especially for new users; some reviewers mention performance issues with large or complex operations and less active customer support. ### Is Maple or Mathematica better for small businesses? MATLAB, Scilab, and GNU Octave are all ranked as Small-Business segment leaders, but among Maple and Mathematica, Mathematica is more frequently used in small-business settings according to G2 alternatives data. - **Maple:** No largest segment data available, but reviewers highlight its value for academic and research use. - **Mathematica:** Frequently used in small-business and academic settings, with reviewers noting its versatility for a wide range of mathematical and technical computing tasks. ### Which Simulation & CAE platform has better integrations? Maple and Mathematica are at parity for integrations, as no recent reviewer-cited integrations are mentioned for either product. - **Maple:** No recent reviewer-cited integrations. - **Mathematica:** No recent reviewer-cited integrations. ### How do Maple and Mathematica compare on customer support? Maple and Mathematica are at near-parity on Quality of Support, with Maple scoring 8.5 and Mathematica 7.9, a difference below the materiality threshold. - **Maple:** Reviewers describe support as helpful, with several noting the usefulness of the help library and support team responsiveness. - **Mathematica:** Reviewers mention generally positive support experiences, though some note less active support and slower response times. ### Which is easier to implement, Maple or Mathematica? Maple and Mathematica are at parity on Ease of Setup, both scoring 7.0, with reviewers noting similar implementation experiences. - **Maple:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward, with a user-friendly GUI aiding initial implementation. - **Mathematica:** Reviewers note easy installation and a user-friendly interface, though some mention a learning curve for new users. Alternatives **Maple Alternatives** ![MATLAB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d5738f5e7922b4552c3ba543a2b9dee6/matlab.jpeg "MATLAB") [ MATLAB ](/products/matlab/reviews) ![GNU Octave](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b7e89f607ee81a33926914cf8b010785/gnu-octave.png "GNU Octave") [ GNU Octave ](/products/gnu-octave/reviews) ![SageMath](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b60f5937b391a668da9bf4723bb1ebcb/sagemath.png "SageMath") [ SageMath ](/products/sagemath/reviews) ![Scilab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6e50bdab7bc21f5fa01a7bd2ca7f33da/scilab.jpg "Scilab") [ Scilab ](/products/scilab/reviews) **Wolfram Mathematica Alternatives** ![MATLAB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_d5738f5e7922b4552c3ba543a2b9dee6/matlab.jpeg "MATLAB") [ MATLAB ](/products/matlab/reviews) ![Scilab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_6e50bdab7bc21f5fa01a7bd2ca7f33da/scilab.jpg "Scilab") [ Scilab ](/products/scilab/reviews) ![GNU Octave](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_b7e89f607ee81a33926914cf8b010785/gnu-octave.png "GNU Octave") [ GNU Octave ](/products/gnu-octave/reviews) ![IBM SPSS Statistics](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_24bb2b0b5af8e7d875ea09d767bcb097/ibm-spss-statistics.jpg "IBM SPSS Statistics") [ SPSS Statistics ](/products/ibm-spss-statistics/reviews) ## Maple vs Wolfram Mathematica - Reviewers felt that Maple meets the needs of their business better than Wolfram Mathematica. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Maple is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Wolfram Mathematica over Maple.