# Maple vs Mathematica Comparison | | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Star Rating** | 4.3 out of 5 | 4.1 out of 5 | | **Total Reviews** | 15 | 86 | | **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (42.9% of reviews) | Enterprise (45.3% of reviews) | | **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | --- ## Ratings Comparison | Rating | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Meets Requirements** | 8.9 (11 reviews) | 8.4 (78 reviews) | | **Ease of Use** | 8.0 (11 reviews) | 7.3 (80 reviews) | | **Ease of Setup** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Ease of Admin** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Quality of Support** | 8.5 (8 reviews) | 7.9 (76 reviews) | | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | Not enough data | Not enough data | | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 7.9 (11 reviews) | 8.1 (79 reviews) | --- ## Pricing ### Maple #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available ### Mathematica #### Entry-Level Pricing No pricing available #### Free Trial No information available --- ## Features Comparison By Category ### Simulation & CAE | Product | Score | Reviews | |---|---|---| | **Maple** | N/A | N/A | | **Mathematica** | 8.5/10 | 15 | #### Design | Feature | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **3D/solid modeling Tools** | Not enough data | 8.5 (8 reviews) | | **Drawing Tools** | Not enough data | 8.1 (9 reviews) | | **Editing Tools** | Not enough data | 8.7 (10 reviews) | | **Rendering tools** | Not enough data | 8.8 (8 reviews) | #### Tools | Feature | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Fluid analysis** | Not enough data | 8.8 (8 reviews) | | **Finite element analysis** | Not enough data | 8.1 (8 reviews) | | **Multibody dynamics** | Not enough data | 7.9 (8 reviews) | #### Work | Feature | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Discrete event modeling** | Not enough data | 8.5 (12 reviews) | | **Continuous event modeling** | Not enough data | 8.2 (12 reviews) | | **Mechanical event simulation** | Not enough data | 8.3 (11 reviews) | | **Manufacturing process simulation** | Not enough data | 9.4 (9 reviews) | | **Integrate** | Not enough data | 9.0 (12 reviews) | #### Environment | Feature | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Hardware support** | Not enough data | 8.2 (10 reviews) | | **Task** | Not enough data | 8.3 (11 reviews) | | **Manage Multiple Profiles** | Not enough data | 8.3 (9 reviews) | | **Command Clarity** | Not enough data | 8.6 (12 reviews) | --- ## Categories **Shared Categories (1):** [Simulation & CAE Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/simulation-cae) --- ## Reviewer Demographics ### By Company Size | Segment | Maple | Mathematica | |---|---|---| | **Small-Business** | 21.4% | 31.4% | | **Mid-Market** | 35.7% | 23.3% | | **Enterprise** | 42.9% | 45.3% | ### By Industry #### Maple - **Higher Education:** 28.6% - **Information Technology and Services:** 14.3% - **Computer Software:** 14.3% - **Research:** 7.1% - **Mechanical or Industrial Engineering:** 7.1% - **Environmental Services:** 7.1% - **Education Management:** 7.1% - **Consumer Services:** 7.1% - **Banking:** 7.1% #### Mathematica - **Research:** 17.4% - **Information Technology and Services:** 9.3% - **Higher Education:** 8.1% - **Automotive:** 7.0% - **Computer Software:** 7.0% - **Civil Engineering:** 4.7% - **Mechanical or Industrial Engineering:** 4.7% - **Education Management:** 3.5% - **Human Resources:** 3.5% - **Computer Networking:** 2.3% - **Other:** 32.6% --- ## Alternatives ### Alternatives to Maple - [MATLAB](https://www.g2.com/products/matlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (771 reviews) - [GNU Octave](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-octave/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (55 reviews) - [SageMath](https://www.g2.com/products/sagemath/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (10 reviews) - [Scilab](https://www.g2.com/products/scilab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (64 reviews) - [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (440 reviews) - [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (519 reviews) - [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (644 reviews) - [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (606 reviews) - [Onshape](https://www.g2.com/products/onshape/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (695 reviews) - [SimScale](https://www.g2.com/products/simscale/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (282 reviews) ### Alternatives to Mathematica - [MATLAB](https://www.g2.com/products/matlab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (771 reviews) - [Scilab](https://www.g2.com/products/scilab/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (64 reviews) - [GNU Octave](https://www.g2.com/products/gnu-octave/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (55 reviews) - [SageMath](https://www.g2.com/products/sagemath/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (10 reviews) - [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/autodesk-fusion/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (519 reviews) - [COMSOL Multiphysics®](https://www.g2.com/products/comsol-multiphysics/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (36 reviews) - [Simulink](https://www.g2.com/products/simulink/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (98 reviews) - [Inventor](https://www.g2.com/products/inventor/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (440 reviews) - [SOLIDWORKS](https://www.g2.com/products/solidworks/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (644 reviews) - [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.g2.com/products/designcenter-solid-edge/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (606 reviews) --- ## Top Discussions ### Maple No discussions available for this product. ### Mathematica - Title: [Is Mathematica used in industry?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-mathematica-used-in-industry) — 1 comment > **Top comment:** "Yes " - Title: [Is Mathematica better than Matlab?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/is-mathematica-better-than-matlab) — 1 comment > **Top comment:** "no but in most of case is more useful " --- **Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/maple-vs-mathematica)