Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare MaintainX and Redzone 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Fluix
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
UpKeep
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
eWorkOrders CMMS
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (79.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 Per User Per Month
Contact Us 1 Annual Subscription
MaintainX
Star Rating
(1,347)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 1 Per User Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansRedzone
Star Rating
(480)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (79.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 Annual Subscription
Learn more about RedzoneSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that MaintainX excels in Ease of Use with a score of 9.4, making it intuitive for teams to adopt quickly, while Redzone, with a score of 9.2, is slightly less user-friendly according to reviewers.
- Reviewers mention that MaintainX offers superior Ease of Setup (9.1) compared to Redzone (8.6), highlighting that users appreciate the straightforward onboarding process and minimal configuration required to get started.
- G2 users note that MaintainX shines in Customizable Workflows (9.2), allowing teams to tailor processes to their specific needs, whereas Redzone (9.0) offers customization but with fewer options, leading to some limitations in flexibility.
- Users on G2 emphasize that MaintainX provides robust Safety checks & inspections features (9.1), which are crucial for compliance, while Redzone (8.9) falls slightly short in this area, leading to concerns about thoroughness in safety management.
- Reviewers mention that MaintainX's Frontline Knowledge Capture & Sharing (9.7) is a standout feature, enabling effective communication and knowledge transfer among team members, while Redzone (8.8) lacks some of the advanced capabilities that users desire.
- Users say that MaintainX's Quality of Support (9.6) is exceptional, with responsive customer service, while Redzone also scores well (9.6), but some users report longer wait times for assistance, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
MaintainX
Basic Plan
Free
1 Per User Per Month
Free forever. For small teams who need to digitize and track work orders.
- Unlimited Work Orders
- Unlimited requester users
- Real-time messaging
Redzone
QAD Redzone Pricing
Contact Us
1 Annual Subscription
- Contact Us for Pricing
Free Trial
MaintainX
Free Trial is available
Redzone
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
1,202
9.4
414
Ease of Use
9.4
1,223
9.2
421
Ease of Setup
9.1
1,086
8.6
348
Ease of Admin
9.3
951
8.9
271
Quality of Support
9.6
1,167
9.6
413
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
936
9.6
269
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
1,187
9.7
409
Features by Category
Asset Definition
9.3
153
Not enough data
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.6
144
Not enough data
Asset Tracking
8.3
145
Not enough data
8.9
147
Not enough data
9.0
148
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Asset Tracking
7.3
99
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.1
91
Not enough data
9.2
92
Not enough data
8.7
90
Not enough data
Analytics
8.8
89
Not enough data
8.8
91
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Asset Performance Management
7.7
56
Not enough data
7.7
57
Not enough data
Workflow & Automation
9.1
212
8.9
350
9.2
206
9.0
342
8.9
14
8.3
28
8.7
14
8.4
28
8.5
14
8.6
29
Execution
9.0
216
8.8
327
9.1
219
8.7
326
9.0
219
9.5
348
Analytics & Reporting
9.2
220
9.4
361
8.9
199
9.3
354
9.0
208
9.2
347
Enterprise Management
9.0
14
8.1
26
9.0
14
8.8
28
9.0
14
8.2
25
9.4
15
8.7
25
9.4
13
8.8
25
Knowledge Capture
9.0
14
9.1
26
8.8
14
8.7
24
8.9
12
8.8
25
9.0
13
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
8.6
178
8.6
34
8.4
176
Feature Not Available
8.3
174
Agentic AI
8.7
13
7.7
22
8.8
13
8.0
22
8.5
13
7.8
22
Data & Integration
9.0
12
8.4
23
9.0
12
7.9
24
Task Tracking
9.2
361
Not enough data
9.2
370
Not enough data
9.4
368
Not enough data
Checklist Options
8.9
361
Not enough data
8.7
333
Not enough data
8.7
336
Not enough data
Software Availability
8.3
318
Not enough data
8.9
354
Not enough data
9.4
372
Not enough data
9.6
370
Not enough data
Asset Definition
9.3
239
Not enough data
8.9
231
Not enough data
8.6
231
Not enough data
8.8
227
Not enough data
Asset Tracking
8.4
228
Not enough data
9.1
238
Not enough data
9.2
235
Not enough data
Inventory
9.0
236
Not enough data
8.9
231
Not enough data
8.6
228
Not enough data
Depreciation
8.0
209
Not enough data
8.1
213
Not enough data
7.1
207
Not enough data
7.6
204
Not enough data
Maintenance
9.3
230
Not enough data
9.3
227
Not enough data
8.9
220
Not enough data
9.2
227
Not enough data
9.1
224
Not enough data
9.0
217
Not enough data
Field Service
9.0
233
Not enough data
9.0
230
Not enough data
8.4
220
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.1
227
Not enough data
9.2
228
Not enough data
8.2
217
Not enough data
Contract & Warranty
7.7
216
Not enough data
7.8
213
Not enough data
7.7
203
Not enough data
Analytics
8.8
225
Not enough data
9.0
226
Not enough data
8.4
209
Not enough data
Integration
7.6
199
Not enough data
7.1
194
Not enough data
7.5
202
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
8.0
37
Not enough data
Nonconformance
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
8.7
14
Not enough data
7.9
14
Quality system
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
8.8
13
Risk Management
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
7.4
13
Not enough data
7.3
13
Inspection Management
Not enough data
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.5
12
Compliance
Not enough data
7.3
13
Not enough data
6.7
12
Not enough data
6.7
12
Platform
Not enough data
7.7
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
9.3
12
Services
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
9.6
13
Not enough data
9.4
13
Not enough data
9.0
13
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Facility Management
7.6
87
Not enough data
Facility Management Platform Features
9.2
448
Not enough data
8.7
441
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
423
Not enough data
8.9
429
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
438
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.1
431
Not enough data
CMMS Platform Features
9.5
781
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
768
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
699
Not enough data
8.6
695
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
678
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
683
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
709
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
639
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
656
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
736
|
Verified
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
MaintainX and Redzone are categorized as Connected Worker Platform and CMMS
Unique Categories
MaintainX is categorized as SAP Store, Standard Operating Procedures, Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Facility Management, Asset Performance Management, and Asset Tracking
Redzone is categorized as Quality Management (QMS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
MaintainX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Redzone
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Manufacturing
14.8%
Facilities Services
7.3%
Construction
4.8%
Food Production
4.3%
Food & Beverages
4.2%
Other
64.7%
Food Production
54.8%
Food & Beverages
19.1%
Manufacturing
12.4%
Consumer Goods
2.9%
Dairy
1.9%
Other
8.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
MaintainX has totally transformed my service department
2 Comments
VL
yes i agree. helps us a lot Read more
Does this software has a report generation section on how much a certain preventive would cost?
2 Comments
RG
This software can measure data that as you want, as long as you report the necessary data.
Read more
CAN YOU ADD MORE FEATURES?
1 Comment
NS
Hi Rizal,
Many thanks for your feedback, it is very important to us.
We would like to add every feature requested by all our amazing customers and we...Read more
Is Redzone a QMS, CMMS, or LMS?
2 Comments
BG
<p>What’s great about Redzone is its flexibility, manufacturers can use it for quality, maintenance, or training depending on their needs. Having QMS, CMMS,...Read more
how do i monitor energy usage
1 Comment
ZS
Hi @Andy! Good to see you again. We typically monitor production and throughput more than energy (to drive behavioral change on the frontlines), but we have...Read more
Is Redzone an MES (Manufacturing Execution System)?
1 Comment
BG
<p>Many manufacturers compare Redzone to a traditional MES because of its real-time OEE tracking and equipment monitoring. The difference is that Redzone...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
