Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare MadCap Syndicate and Paligo 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Croct
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Contact Us
MadCap Syndicate
Star Rating
(18)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about MadCap SyndicatePaligo
Star Rating
(57)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Paligo excels in its XML Authoring capabilities, scoring 9.0, which reviewers mention makes it easier to create structured content efficiently. In contrast, Xyleme also offers strong XML support but does not highlight this feature as prominently.
- Reviewers mention that Paligo's collaborative review feature, rated at 8.4, is effective for team feedback, while Xyleme shines with a higher score of 9.7, indicating a more robust collaborative environment that users appreciate for its seamless integration.
- G2 users highlight that Paligo's ease of use is rated at 8.7, making it user-friendly for new adopters, whereas Xyleme, with a score of 8.3, is perceived as slightly more complex, which may require additional training for effective utilization.
- Users on G2 report that Paligo's quality of support is rated at 9.3, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In comparison, Xyleme has an even higher score of 9.7, indicating exceptional support that users find invaluable.
- Reviewers mention that Paligo's automated publishing feature is a strong point, allowing for efficient content distribution, while Xyleme's publishing capabilities are also robust but are noted for their advanced multi-language support, which is crucial for global teams.
- Users say that Paligo's performance rating of 8.9 reflects its reliability in handling large volumes of content, while Xyleme's performance score of 9.3 suggests it may handle complex workflows and integrations more effectively, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
MadCap Syndicate
MadCap Syndicate
Contact Us
Pricing is based on a variety of factors. Contact us for a custom quote today.
- Pricing is based on a variety of factors. Contact us for a custom quote today.
Paligo
Professional
Contact Us
Full CCMS with single-sourcing:
- Powerful single-sourcing
- Topic-based Authoring
- Translation management
Free Trial
MadCap Syndicate
No trial information availablePaligo
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
10
9.0
40
Ease of Use
8.3
9
8.7
40
Ease of Setup
8.1
6
8.5
27
Ease of Admin
8.6
7
9.1
30
Quality of Support
9.7
10
9.3
40
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
7
9.4
30
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
7
8.3
35
Features by Category
XML Data Model Type
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
8.7
21
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.9
6
Software Model
9.3
5
8.9
23
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
9.3
5
9.0
26
Creation Features
Not enough data
9.0
27
8.7
5
8.3
25
9.7
5
8.4
31
Training & eLearning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Publishing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Headless CMS
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflow
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
MadCap Syndicate and Paligo are categorized as Component Content Management Systems
Unique Categories
MadCap Syndicate is categorized as Headless CMS, eLearning Content, and Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Paligo has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
MadCap Syndicate
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Paligo
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
16.7%
Telecommunications
11.1%
Banking
11.1%
Utilities
5.6%
Professional Training & Coaching
5.6%
Other
50.0%
Computer Software
40.4%
Industrial Automation
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Machinery
5.3%
Hospital & Health Care
5.3%
Other
35.1%
Discussions
How does Syndicate support AI and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)?
1 Comment
Official Response from MadCap Syndicate
Syndicate RAG connects large language models (LLMs) directly to your governed enterprise content. That means every AI response is powered by truth, not...Read more
What kind of customer support and training do we receive?
1 Comment
Official Response from MadCap Syndicate
MadCap Software provides hands-on onboarding, best-practice guidance, and ongoing support. From setup to advanced governance workflows, our experts help you...Read more
How does Syndicate improve content discovery and search accuracy?
1 Comment
Official Response from MadCap Syndicate
Through metadata, tagging, and semantic relationships, Syndicate turns content into searchable knowledge. Employees, customers, and even AI tools can...Read more
Does Paligo use DITA?
3 Comments
RL
No, it uses DocBook, another XML language, which does most if not all of the things that make DITA useful to tech pubs groups.Read more
Table Alignment
2 Comments
RC
All layout issues are handled in the output and not from the topics. Use the Layouts in Paligo (depending on your output) as well as customizing the output...Read more
Who uses Paligo?
2 Comments
SZ
Hi, for the users role, there can be Technical writer, Information Architect, Translator, Document engineer, document reviewer,ect.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
