Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare mabl and testRigor 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (80.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Free
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabltestRigor
Star Rating
(16)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (80.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that mabl excels in its ease of use with a score of 9.0, while testRigor AI-powered Automation Testing Tool has a slightly higher score of 9.6, indicating that both tools are user-friendly but testRigor may offer a more intuitive experience.
- Reviewers mention that mabl provides robust test feedback with a score of 9.1, which helps teams quickly identify issues, whereas testRigor's test feedback capabilities are not explicitly rated but are noted for their effectiveness in streamlining the testing process.
- G2 users highlight mabl's strong reliability with a score of 9.0, suggesting that it consistently performs well under various testing conditions, while testRigor's reliability is implied through its high overall ratings but lacks a specific score in this area.
- Users on G2 report that mabl's customization options score 8.8, allowing teams to tailor their testing environments, while testRigor is praised for its flexibility in adapting to different testing scenarios, although specific customization scores are not provided.
- Reviewers say that mabl's reporting features are comprehensive, contributing to a better understanding of test results, while testRigor's analytics capabilities are highlighted for their depth, helping teams make data-driven decisions.
- Users report that mabl has a strong focus on stress testing and extreme cases, which is crucial for performance testing, while testRigor is noted for its emphasis on automation and organization, making it a solid choice for teams looking to streamline their testing workflows.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
testRigor
Free Open Source
Free
All tests and test results are PUBLIC for anyone to see, and you can share your results as a unique public URL
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited test cases
- Up to 1 parallelization
Free Trial
mabl
Free Trial is available
testRigor
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
28
9.6
8
Ease of Use
9.0
28
9.6
8
Ease of Setup
8.8
11
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.0
5
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.2
28
9.8
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
5
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
26
8.5
8
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Email Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
Automation
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
mabl and testRigor are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
testRigor is categorized as Email Testing and Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
testRigor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Computer Software
40.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.3%
Telecommunications
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Marketing and Advertising
6.7%
Other
26.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
testRigor has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
