Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare M-Files and Revver 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
FolderManifest
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Meridian
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (68.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Vendor for Pricing
No pricing available
M-Files
Star Rating
(284)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Vendor for Pricing
Learn more about M-FilesRevver
Star Rating
(384)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (68.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RevverSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that M-Files excels in Document Collaboration with a perfect score of 10.0, allowing teams to work seamlessly together, while Revver's collaboration features, although strong, score lower at 8.6, indicating room for improvement in real-time collaboration capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that M-Files offers superior Document Identification with a perfect score of 10.0, which helps in efficiently categorizing and retrieving documents, whereas Revver's document identification features are not as robust, scoring lower at 8.0.
- G2 users highlight M-Files' strong File Type Support with a score of 9.1, accommodating a wide range of file formats, while Revver, although competitive, scores slightly lower at 9.0, suggesting it may not support as many file types.
- Users on G2 report that M-Files has a more user-friendly Web Interface with a score of 8.4, making navigation easier, compared to Revver's score of 8.3, which indicates a slightly less intuitive user experience.
- Reviewers mention that M-Files provides better Versioning capabilities with a score of 9.0, allowing users to track changes effectively, while Revver's versioning features score lower at 8.4, which may hinder users needing detailed version control.
- Users say that M-Files has a more comprehensive Search functionality, scoring 9.0, which enhances document retrieval efficiency, while Revver's search capabilities, scoring 8.6, may not be as effective in quickly locating documents.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Revver
No pricing availableFree Trial
M-Files
Free Trial is available
Revver
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
231
8.9
314
Ease of Use
8.6
233
8.6
319
Ease of Setup
8.3
192
8.2
209
Ease of Admin
7.7
87
8.4
201
Quality of Support
8.6
222
8.7
304
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
86
8.8
199
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
226
8.3
314
Features by Category
File Management
9.5
42
8.6
117
9.2
41
8.6
134
9.6
43
9.0
164
9.6
43
8.4
180
8.7
41
8.0
75
Agentic AI - Cloud Content Collaboration
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Feature Not Available
Collaboration
9.3
41
8.7
112
9.4
42
8.7
137
9.2
41
8.1
100
9.3
43
8.7
107
Administration
9.2
41
8.9
160
9.3
40
8.9
151
9.1
43
8.9
121
8.7
40
9.2
140
9.0
40
9.2
119
9.3
41
9.2
164
Platform
9.4
39
8.5
121
9.4
38
8.6
83
9.3
36
8.8
74
9.2
33
8.5
47
Interface and Performance
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.8
18
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
7.4
14
Asset Management
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
7.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
7.9
13
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
6.7
12
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Media Types
Not enough data
6.4
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.0
15
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
17
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
6.4
13
Not enough data
5.4
13
Agentic AI - Digital Asset Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Setup
9.2
69
Not enough data
9.1
66
Not enough data
9.0
66
Not enough data
8.8
70
Not enough data
Management
9.1
68
Not enough data
8.9
65
Not enough data
9.2
67
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.7
62
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workflow Management
9.4
18
Not enough data
9.3
19
Not enough data
9.3
18
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
9.4
19
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
Platform Basics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
10.0
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
6.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Collaboration
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
3.0
5
Not enough data
5.0
5
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
6.7
5
Onboarding Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Project Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customer Engagement
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Data Management
9.4
34
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
Dashboards
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
8.6
31
Not enough data
Collaboration
9.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
Security
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
Management and Discovery - IT Documentation
9.1
57
Not enough data
9.3
54
Not enough data
9.4
54
Not enough data
Operations - IT Documentation
9.2
53
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
9.4
56
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
8.7
34
Not enough data
9.0
32
Feature Not Available
9.0
33
Not enough data
File Management
9.2
148
9.0
75
9.2
149
8.3
45
8.5
112
8.0
44
9.2
132
8.4
37
8.7
135
8.6
42
8.6
127
8.3
42
8.3
111
8.4
33
8.4
106
8.4
39
8.5
116
8.3
39
9.1
148
8.6
73
8.8
132
8.3
50
8.6
115
7.8
30
Workflow
8.8
135
8.3
40
8.7
134
8.1
36
8.6
127
8.5
37
8.9
126
8.8
56
8.8
115
8.6
38
Platform
9.0
110
8.5
31
8.8
144
8.6
69
8.5
127
8.1
45
8.7
126
8.0
42
8.7
111
7.4
29
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
M-Files and Revver are categorized as Document Management, Cloud Content Collaboration, and Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Unique Categories
M-Files is categorized as Engineering Document Management, Workflow Management, and IT Documentation
Revver is categorized as Digital Asset Management, Client Portal, Client Onboarding, and HR Compliance
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
M-Files
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Revver
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Education Management
5.5%
Marketing and Advertising
5.0%
Construction
4.6%
Oil & Energy
4.2%
Other
65.1%
Accounting
25.9%
Financial Services
16.2%
Insurance
4.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Non-Profit Organization Management
2.4%
Other
46.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What kind of companies use M-Files?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files has customers in over 100 countries and range from organizations that just want to eliminate confusing folder structures to those companies with...Read more
Is M-Files 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files enables organizations to comply with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 regulations. An essential part of fulfilling these regulations is the use of revision and...Read more
Does M-Files provide an audit trail?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files includes the following audit trail functionality:
- Recording of object-specific events, such as object addition, modification and deletion...Read more
When will ease of use improve for securedrawer?
2 Comments
ET
We have found that the clients older than 40 were looking for more intuitive eFileCabinet. Once we explain it's just a (file-share) drawer they understood...Read more
There Are a Lot of Up-Front Costs, Right?
1 Comment
Official Response from Revver
Yes, there are up-front costs, but the term “a lot” does not do the long-term benefits of document management software justice. The benefits of DMS are best...Read more
Shouldn’t We Continue Using Paper if Our Customers Do?
1 Comment
Official Response from Revver
Now that there are alternatives to paper-based document management, this question naturally arises. However, customers arguably benefit most from paperless...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
