Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare M-Files and OpenText Content Management

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
M-Files
M-Files
Star Rating
(282)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Vendor for Pricing
Learn more about M-Files
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management
Star Rating
(68)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (35.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that M-Files excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to OpenText Content Management. Users appreciate its intuitive design, stating that it is "simple to learn" and allows for easy access to documents from anywhere, enhancing productivity.
  • According to verified reviews, M-Files stands out for its seamless integration with daily processes, making it easy to retrieve important information quickly. Users highlight features like version control and permission management as strong points, which contribute to a more organized workflow.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText Content Management offers robust features for document organization and collaboration, but it falls short in user satisfaction compared to M-Files. While some users find it effective for creating unique content, they note that it lacks the same level of intuitive usability that M-Files provides.
  • Users say that M-Files has a more favorable implementation experience, with many praising its quick onboarding process. In contrast, OpenText Content Management has received feedback indicating that users face challenges during setup, which can hinder initial productivity.
  • Reviewers highlight M-Files' superior support quality, with many users expressing satisfaction with the assistance they receive. In comparison, OpenText Content Management's support has been described as less responsive, which can be a concern for organizations needing timely help.
  • G2 reviewers note that M-Files consistently meets user requirements better than OpenText Content Management, with higher ratings in areas like ease of use and device syncing. Users appreciate M-Files' ability to integrate with tools like Outlook, making it a more versatile choice for everyday tasks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
M-Files
Contact Vendor
Contact Vendor for Pricing
Learn more about M-Files
OpenText Content Management
X1 Plan - Boost team productivity
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
M-Files
Free Trial is available
OpenText Content Management
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
230
8.2
57
Ease of Use
8.6
231
8.0
57
Ease of Setup
8.3
190
7.0
28
Ease of Admin
7.7
88
7.5
28
Quality of Support
8.6
221
7.9
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
87
7.3
27
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
225
7.5
57
Features by Category
Cloud Content CollaborationHide 22 FeaturesShow 22 Features
9.3
46
8.0
17
File Management
9.5
41
8.0
14
9.2
40
7.8
12
9.6
42
8.1
12
9.6
42
7.9
11
8.6
40
8.3
13
Agentic AI - Cloud Content Collaboration
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Collaboration
9.3
40
7.9
13
9.4
41
8.2
12
9.2
40
8.0
11
9.3
42
7.4
13
Administration
9.2
40
8.3
10
9.4
39
7.9
13
9.1
42
8.2
10
8.7
39
7.5
10
9.0
39
7.6
12
9.4
40
8.2
10
Platform
9.4
38
8.2
14
9.4
37
8.1
13
9.3
35
8.8
11
9.3
32
8.2
14
9.2
73
Not enough data
Setup
9.2
69
Not enough data
9.1
66
Not enough data
9.0
66
Not enough data
8.8
70
Not enough data
Management
9.1
68
Not enough data
8.9
65
Not enough data
9.2
67
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.7
62
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workflow Management
9.4
18
Not enough data
9.3
19
Not enough data
9.3
18
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
9.4
19
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
Engineering Document ManagementHide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
9.3
34
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
34
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
Dashboards
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.6
30
Not enough data
8.7
30
Not enough data
8.6
31
Not enough data
Collaboration
9.3
32
Not enough data
8.6
29
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
Security
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.3
60
Not enough data
Management and Discovery - IT Documentation
9.1
57
Not enough data
9.3
54
Not enough data
9.4
54
Not enough data
Operations - IT Documentation
9.2
53
Not enough data
8.8
52
Not enough data
9.4
56
Not enough data
Enterprise Content Management (ECM)Hide 25 FeaturesShow 25 Features
8.8
192
8.1
51
Agentic AI - Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
8.7
34
Not enough data
9.0
32
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
File Management
9.2
147
8.4
43
9.2
150
8.3
40
8.5
112
8.4
35
9.2
132
8.5
41
8.7
135
8.1
38
8.6
127
8.0
41
8.3
111
7.8
37
8.4
106
7.9
38
8.5
116
8.1
37
9.1
148
7.7
41
8.8
132
8.0
41
8.6
115
7.4
28
Workflow
8.8
135
7.9
38
8.7
134
7.7
37
8.6
127
7.9
37
8.9
127
8.5
41
8.8
115
8.2
33
Platform
9.0
110
8.3
33
8.8
144
7.9
43
8.5
127
8.2
41
8.7
126
8.1
37
8.7
111
8.1
36
Not enough data
Not enough data
Knowledge Base
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
M-Files
M-Files
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management
M-Files and OpenText Content Management are categorized as Document Management, Cloud Content Collaboration, and Enterprise Content Management (ECM)
Unique Categories
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
M-Files
M-Files
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
32.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
47.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
20.3%
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
33.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
35.4%
Reviewers' Industry
M-Files
M-Files
Information Technology and Services
15.7%
Marketing and Advertising
5.1%
Oil & Energy
4.7%
Education Management
4.7%
Construction
4.7%
Other
65.3%
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management
Information Technology and Services
12.3%
Oil & Energy
7.7%
Computer Software
7.7%
Financial Services
6.2%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.6%
Other
61.5%
Alternatives
M-Files
M-Files Alternatives
DocuWare
DocuWare
Add DocuWare
Laserfiche
Laserfiche
Add Laserfiche
Revver
Revver
Add Revver
Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase
Add Hyland OnBase
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management Alternatives
Laserfiche
Laserfiche
Add Laserfiche
Box
Box
Add Box
Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase
Add Hyland OnBase
Docusign CLM
Docusign CLM
Add Docusign CLM
Discussions
M-Files
M-Files Discussions
What kind of companies use M-Files?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files has customers in over 100 countries and range from organizations that just want to eliminate confusing folder structures to those companies with...Read more
Is M-Files 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files enables organizations to comply with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 regulations. An essential part of fulfilling these regulations is the use of revision and...Read more
Does M-Files provide an audit trail?
1 Comment
Official Response from M-Files
M-Files includes the following audit trail functionality: - Recording of object-specific events, such as object addition, modification and deletion...Read more
OpenText Content Management
OpenText Content Management Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Content Management has no discussions with answers